耐力训练中的刺激水平:对未训练男性乳酸动力学的影响。

Pub Date : 2018-12-02 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/3158949
Michael Tuttor, Simon von Stengel, Michael Hettchen, Wolfgang Kemmler
{"title":"耐力训练中的刺激水平:对未训练男性乳酸动力学的影响。","authors":"Michael Tuttor,&nbsp;Simon von Stengel,&nbsp;Michael Hettchen,&nbsp;Wolfgang Kemmler","doi":"10.1155/2018/3158949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Not only but particularly due to their time efficiency, High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) is becoming increasingly popular in fitness-oriented endurance sports. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a HIIT running program versus a Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise (MICE) training running program (16 weeks each) on lactate kinetics in untrained males.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>65 healthy but untrained males (30-50 years, BMI: 27.2 ± 3.7kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomly assigned to either an HIIT (n=33) or a waiting-control/MICE group (n=32). HIIT consisted of intervals and intense continuous running bouts at or above the individual anaerobic threshold (IANS, 95-110% of IANS-HR), while MICE focused on continuous running at 70-82.5% IANS-HR. Both programs were adjusted for \"total workload\". Study endpoints were time to IANS and time from IANS till \"time to exhaustion\" (TTE) as assessed by stepwise treadmill test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both exercise groups time to reach IANS (MICE: 320 ± 160 s versus HIIT: 198 ± 118 s) increased significantly (p<.001), with the groups differing significantly (p<.001). Time from IANS until TTE was prolonged significantly among the HIIT group (27 ± 66s, p=.030), while among the MICE group a significant reduction of time from IANS until TTE (59 ± 109s; p=.017) was determined. Between-group difference is significant (p=.003) for this parameter. In both groups TTE increased significantly (HIIT: 27.2 ± 17.7% versus MICE: 29.0 ± 19.4%, both p<.001) at a similar level (p=.279).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HIIT and MICE protocols, when adjusted for total workload, similarly increased running performance in untrained male subjects; however, the underlying mechanisms differ fundamentally. Due to its effects on aerobic and anaerobic performance improvement, HIIT can be recommended for untrained individuals as a time-efficient alternative or complementary training method to MICE. However, our protocol did not confirm the general superiority of HIIT versus MICE on the key endurance parameter \"time to exhaustion\" that has been reported by other comparative exercise studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73953,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"2018 ","pages":"3158949"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/3158949","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stimulus Level during Endurance Training: Effects on Lactate Kinetics in Untrained Men.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Tuttor,&nbsp;Simon von Stengel,&nbsp;Michael Hettchen,&nbsp;Wolfgang Kemmler\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2018/3158949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Not only but particularly due to their time efficiency, High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) is becoming increasingly popular in fitness-oriented endurance sports. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a HIIT running program versus a Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise (MICE) training running program (16 weeks each) on lactate kinetics in untrained males.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>65 healthy but untrained males (30-50 years, BMI: 27.2 ± 3.7kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomly assigned to either an HIIT (n=33) or a waiting-control/MICE group (n=32). HIIT consisted of intervals and intense continuous running bouts at or above the individual anaerobic threshold (IANS, 95-110% of IANS-HR), while MICE focused on continuous running at 70-82.5% IANS-HR. Both programs were adjusted for \\\"total workload\\\". Study endpoints were time to IANS and time from IANS till \\\"time to exhaustion\\\" (TTE) as assessed by stepwise treadmill test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both exercise groups time to reach IANS (MICE: 320 ± 160 s versus HIIT: 198 ± 118 s) increased significantly (p<.001), with the groups differing significantly (p<.001). Time from IANS until TTE was prolonged significantly among the HIIT group (27 ± 66s, p=.030), while among the MICE group a significant reduction of time from IANS until TTE (59 ± 109s; p=.017) was determined. Between-group difference is significant (p=.003) for this parameter. In both groups TTE increased significantly (HIIT: 27.2 ± 17.7% versus MICE: 29.0 ± 19.4%, both p<.001) at a similar level (p=.279).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HIIT and MICE protocols, when adjusted for total workload, similarly increased running performance in untrained male subjects; however, the underlying mechanisms differ fundamentally. Due to its effects on aerobic and anaerobic performance improvement, HIIT can be recommended for untrained individuals as a time-efficient alternative or complementary training method to MICE. However, our protocol did not confirm the general superiority of HIIT versus MICE on the key endurance parameter \\\"time to exhaustion\\\" that has been reported by other comparative exercise studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"2018 \",\"pages\":\"3158949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/3158949\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3158949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3158949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景/目的:高强度间歇训练(HIIT)不仅时间效率高,而且在以健身为导向的耐力运动中越来越受欢迎。本研究的目的是确定HIIT跑步计划与中等强度连续运动(MICE)训练跑步计划(各16周)对未经训练的男性乳酸动力学的影响。方法:65名30-50岁,BMI: 27.2±3.7kg/m2的健康未训练男性,随机分为HIIT组(n=33)和等待对照组/小鼠组(n=32)。HIIT包括间歇和高强度连续跑步,达到或高于个人无氧阈值(IANS, 95% -110%的ian - hr),而MICE专注于以70-82.5%的ian - hr连续跑步。这两个程序都根据“总工作量”进行了调整。研究终点为到达IANS的时间和从IANS到“疲劳时间”(TTE)的时间,采用逐步跑步机试验评估。结果:在两个运动组中,达到IANS的时间(小鼠:320±160秒,HIIT: 198±118秒)显著增加(结论:HIIT和小鼠方案,当调整总工作量时,同样提高了未训练的男性受试者的跑步表现;然而,潜在的机制根本不同。由于HIIT对有氧和无氧表现的改善作用,HIIT可以推荐给未经训练的个人,作为小鼠训练的一种时间效率高的替代或补充训练方法。然而,我们的方案并没有证实HIIT与MICE在关键耐力参数“疲劳时间”上的普遍优势,而其他比较运动研究已经报道了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stimulus Level during Endurance Training: Effects on Lactate Kinetics in Untrained Men.

Background/objective: Not only but particularly due to their time efficiency, High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) is becoming increasingly popular in fitness-oriented endurance sports. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a HIIT running program versus a Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise (MICE) training running program (16 weeks each) on lactate kinetics in untrained males.

Methods: 65 healthy but untrained males (30-50 years, BMI: 27.2 ± 3.7kg/m2) were randomly assigned to either an HIIT (n=33) or a waiting-control/MICE group (n=32). HIIT consisted of intervals and intense continuous running bouts at or above the individual anaerobic threshold (IANS, 95-110% of IANS-HR), while MICE focused on continuous running at 70-82.5% IANS-HR. Both programs were adjusted for "total workload". Study endpoints were time to IANS and time from IANS till "time to exhaustion" (TTE) as assessed by stepwise treadmill test.

Results: In both exercise groups time to reach IANS (MICE: 320 ± 160 s versus HIIT: 198 ± 118 s) increased significantly (p<.001), with the groups differing significantly (p<.001). Time from IANS until TTE was prolonged significantly among the HIIT group (27 ± 66s, p=.030), while among the MICE group a significant reduction of time from IANS until TTE (59 ± 109s; p=.017) was determined. Between-group difference is significant (p=.003) for this parameter. In both groups TTE increased significantly (HIIT: 27.2 ± 17.7% versus MICE: 29.0 ± 19.4%, both p<.001) at a similar level (p=.279).

Conclusion: HIIT and MICE protocols, when adjusted for total workload, similarly increased running performance in untrained male subjects; however, the underlying mechanisms differ fundamentally. Due to its effects on aerobic and anaerobic performance improvement, HIIT can be recommended for untrained individuals as a time-efficient alternative or complementary training method to MICE. However, our protocol did not confirm the general superiority of HIIT versus MICE on the key endurance parameter "time to exhaustion" that has been reported by other comparative exercise studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1