使用数码照片、电影和智能手机应用程序测量肘部运动范围的有效性和可靠性。

Pub Date : 2018-11-29 DOI:10.1155/2018/7906875
Renée Keijsers, Elisa L Zwerus, Dagmar R M van Lith, Koen L M Koenraadt, Pjotr Goossens, Bertram The, Michel P J van den Bekerom, Denise Eygendaal
{"title":"使用数码照片、电影和智能手机应用程序测量肘部运动范围的有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Renée Keijsers,&nbsp;Elisa L Zwerus,&nbsp;Dagmar R M van Lith,&nbsp;Koen L M Koenraadt,&nbsp;Pjotr Goossens,&nbsp;Bertram The,&nbsp;Michel P J van den Bekerom,&nbsp;Denise Eygendaal","doi":"10.1155/2018/7906875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Range of motion (ROM) is closely monitored before and after surgery for stiff elbow and during rehabilitation. Measurements in the home environment may be helpful to increase involvement and adherence of the patient. Therefore, our objective is to investigate the validity and inter- and intraobserver reliability of 3 alternative methods to assess the ROM by the patient in a home-based situation, in comparison to the universal goniometer (UG). We hypothesize that all 3 alternative methods will be valid alternatives and show a level of reliability equivalent to UG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Goniometric measurements of elbow flexion, extension, pronation and supination using photography, movie, and a smartphone application were obtained. The validity of these measurement methods was compared to UG. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability were calculated for all measurement methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Photography and movie based goniometry of the elbow showed good validity in flexion and extension. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability were found to be good to excellent for photo and movie but moderate to poor for UG and the smartphone application.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Photo or movie based goniometry seems to be a useful option for initial and follow-up measurement of the elbow ROM, both in the outpatient clinic and in a home environment. Based on our study, the smartphone application we used is not recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":73953,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"2018 ","pages":"7906875"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/7906875","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of Elbow Range of Motion Measurements Using Digital Photographs, Movies, and a Goniometry Smartphone Application.\",\"authors\":\"Renée Keijsers,&nbsp;Elisa L Zwerus,&nbsp;Dagmar R M van Lith,&nbsp;Koen L M Koenraadt,&nbsp;Pjotr Goossens,&nbsp;Bertram The,&nbsp;Michel P J van den Bekerom,&nbsp;Denise Eygendaal\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2018/7906875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Range of motion (ROM) is closely monitored before and after surgery for stiff elbow and during rehabilitation. Measurements in the home environment may be helpful to increase involvement and adherence of the patient. Therefore, our objective is to investigate the validity and inter- and intraobserver reliability of 3 alternative methods to assess the ROM by the patient in a home-based situation, in comparison to the universal goniometer (UG). We hypothesize that all 3 alternative methods will be valid alternatives and show a level of reliability equivalent to UG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Goniometric measurements of elbow flexion, extension, pronation and supination using photography, movie, and a smartphone application were obtained. The validity of these measurement methods was compared to UG. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability were calculated for all measurement methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Photography and movie based goniometry of the elbow showed good validity in flexion and extension. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability were found to be good to excellent for photo and movie but moderate to poor for UG and the smartphone application.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Photo or movie based goniometry seems to be a useful option for initial and follow-up measurement of the elbow ROM, both in the outpatient clinic and in a home environment. Based on our study, the smartphone application we used is not recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"2018 \",\"pages\":\"7906875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/7906875\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7906875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7906875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

引言:活动范围(ROM)在肘关节僵硬手术前后和康复期间都受到密切监测。在家庭环境中进行测量可能有助于增加患者的参与度和依从性。因此,我们的目的是与通用测角仪(UG)相比,研究3种替代方法在家庭情况下评估患者ROM的有效性以及观察者间和观察者内的可靠性。我们假设所有3种替代方法都是有效的替代方法,并显示出相当于UG的可靠性水平。方法:使用摄影、电影和智能手机应用程序对肘部屈曲、伸展、内旋和旋后进行测量。将这些测量方法的有效性与UG进行比较。计算所有测量方法的观察者间和观察者内可靠性。结果:肘关节的摄影和电影角度测量显示出良好的屈伸有效性。研究发现,对于照片和电影,观察者间和观察者内的可靠性从好到好,但对于UG和智能手机应用程序,可靠性从中等到差。结论:无论是在门诊还是在家庭环境中,基于照片或电影的测角术似乎都是肘关节ROM的初始和后续测量的有用选择。根据我们的研究,不推荐使用我们使用的智能手机应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity and Reliability of Elbow Range of Motion Measurements Using Digital Photographs, Movies, and a Goniometry Smartphone Application.

Introduction: Range of motion (ROM) is closely monitored before and after surgery for stiff elbow and during rehabilitation. Measurements in the home environment may be helpful to increase involvement and adherence of the patient. Therefore, our objective is to investigate the validity and inter- and intraobserver reliability of 3 alternative methods to assess the ROM by the patient in a home-based situation, in comparison to the universal goniometer (UG). We hypothesize that all 3 alternative methods will be valid alternatives and show a level of reliability equivalent to UG.

Methods: Goniometric measurements of elbow flexion, extension, pronation and supination using photography, movie, and a smartphone application were obtained. The validity of these measurement methods was compared to UG. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability were calculated for all measurement methods.

Results: Photography and movie based goniometry of the elbow showed good validity in flexion and extension. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability were found to be good to excellent for photo and movie but moderate to poor for UG and the smartphone application.

Conclusions: Photo or movie based goniometry seems to be a useful option for initial and follow-up measurement of the elbow ROM, both in the outpatient clinic and in a home environment. Based on our study, the smartphone application we used is not recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1