民主党接管众议院引发药品价格立法谈判:但由于患者和行业的反对,强有力的立法不太可能。

Q1 Medicine P and T Pub Date : 2019-04-01
Stephen Barlas
{"title":"民主党接管众议院引发药品价格立法谈判:但由于患者和行业的反对,强有力的立法不太可能。","authors":"Stephen Barlas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>HHS has proposed regulations to attack high drug prices, a priority for the current administration. Both parties have spoken out against the drug companies but the change in control of the House is no guarantee of pricing legislation moving forward. And if drug manufacturers, PBMs, and others are adamant about tackling drug prices, why do they oppose the best cost-cutting proposals?</p>","PeriodicalId":38773,"journal":{"name":"P and T","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428499/pdf/ptj4404180.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Democratic Takeover of House Sparks Drug-Price Legislation Talks: But Strong Legislation Unlikely Given Patient and Industry Opposition.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Barlas\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>HHS has proposed regulations to attack high drug prices, a priority for the current administration. Both parties have spoken out against the drug companies but the change in control of the House is no guarantee of pricing legislation moving forward. And if drug manufacturers, PBMs, and others are adamant about tackling drug prices, why do they oppose the best cost-cutting proposals?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"P and T\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428499/pdf/ptj4404180.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"P and T\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"P and T","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生与公众服务部提出了打击高药价的法规,这是本届政府的一个优先事项。两党都公开反对制药公司,但众议院控制权的变化并不能保证定价立法向前推进。如果药品制造商、药品福利管理机构和其他机构坚持要解决药品价格问题,他们为什么要反对最好的削减成本的建议呢?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Democratic Takeover of House Sparks Drug-Price Legislation Talks: But Strong Legislation Unlikely Given Patient and Industry Opposition.

HHS has proposed regulations to attack high drug prices, a priority for the current administration. Both parties have spoken out against the drug companies but the change in control of the House is no guarantee of pricing legislation moving forward. And if drug manufacturers, PBMs, and others are adamant about tackling drug prices, why do they oppose the best cost-cutting proposals?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
P and T
P and T Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Better. American Society of Clinical Oncology Is Ciprofloxacin in Combination With Beta-lactam Antibiotics a Recipe for Thrombocytosis?: A Case Report of Thrombocytosis in a Patient Receiving Ciprofloxacin and Ceftriaxone. Outcomes of Inpatient Administration of Restricted Antineoplastic Medications at a Large Academic Medical Institution. PerserisTM: A New and Long-Acting, Atypical Antipsychotic Drug-Delivery System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1