{"title":"不同印模技术制备氧化锆三单元固定局部义齿的配合评价","authors":"Ghassan Moustapha, Khaled Azzam, Emad AlShwaimi, Munir Silwadi, Marco Ferrari, Ziad Salameh","doi":"10.1111/jicd.12413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of zirconium fixed partial denture using different impression techniques.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A Nissin Typodont model, including maxillary central incisor and canine with missing lateral incisor, was selected for the present study. Thirty zirconium frameworks were fabricated following three impression techniques (N = 10), conventional silicone impression (group C), scanned dental impression (group S), and Trios 3 (3Shape) intraoral scanner (group T). An extra-fine milling strategy was applied.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Group T had the smallest discrepancy compared to groups C (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.006) and S (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.052) at the marginal level, whereas it was larger at the incisal tip. Discrepancies in group T were smaller than group C (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.004) when measured at the axial walls, and smaller than group S (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.045) when measured at the chamfer area for the central teeth only. Samples in group T showed a greater percentage of equally extended restorations (52.5%), while other groups were mainly underextended (group C: 63.7%, group S: 68.8%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Better adaptation was achieved with the intraoral scanner group, except at the incisal tip. Conventional and scanned impressions revealed a greater percentage of underextended restorations<b>.</b></p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jicd.12413","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the fit of zirconia three-unit fixed partial dentures fabricated by different impression techniques\",\"authors\":\"Ghassan Moustapha, Khaled Azzam, Emad AlShwaimi, Munir Silwadi, Marco Ferrari, Ziad Salameh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jicd.12413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of zirconium fixed partial denture using different impression techniques.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A Nissin Typodont model, including maxillary central incisor and canine with missing lateral incisor, was selected for the present study. Thirty zirconium frameworks were fabricated following three impression techniques (N = 10), conventional silicone impression (group C), scanned dental impression (group S), and Trios 3 (3Shape) intraoral scanner (group T). An extra-fine milling strategy was applied.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Group T had the smallest discrepancy compared to groups C (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.006) and S (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.052) at the marginal level, whereas it was larger at the incisal tip. Discrepancies in group T were smaller than group C (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.004) when measured at the axial walls, and smaller than group S (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.045) when measured at the chamfer area for the central teeth only. Samples in group T showed a greater percentage of equally extended restorations (52.5%), while other groups were mainly underextended (group C: 63.7%, group S: 68.8%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Better adaptation was achieved with the intraoral scanner group, except at the incisal tip. Conventional and scanned impressions revealed a greater percentage of underextended restorations<b>.</b></p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jicd.12413\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jicd.12413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jicd.12413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of the fit of zirconia three-unit fixed partial dentures fabricated by different impression techniques
Aim
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of zirconium fixed partial denture using different impression techniques.
Methods
A Nissin Typodont model, including maxillary central incisor and canine with missing lateral incisor, was selected for the present study. Thirty zirconium frameworks were fabricated following three impression techniques (N = 10), conventional silicone impression (group C), scanned dental impression (group S), and Trios 3 (3Shape) intraoral scanner (group T). An extra-fine milling strategy was applied.
Results
Group T had the smallest discrepancy compared to groups C (P =0.006) and S (P =0.052) at the marginal level, whereas it was larger at the incisal tip. Discrepancies in group T were smaller than group C (P =0.004) when measured at the axial walls, and smaller than group S (P =0.045) when measured at the chamfer area for the central teeth only. Samples in group T showed a greater percentage of equally extended restorations (52.5%), while other groups were mainly underextended (group C: 63.7%, group S: 68.8%).
Conclusion
Better adaptation was achieved with the intraoral scanner group, except at the incisal tip. Conventional and scanned impressions revealed a greater percentage of underextended restorations.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry (JICD) aims to publish quality, peer reviewed original research and topical reviews on all aspects of investigative and clinical dentistry and craniofacial research, including molecular studies related to oral health and disease. Although international in outlook, the Editor especially encourages papers from the Asia Pacific. The journal also aims to provide clinicians, scientists and students of dentistry with a knowledge transfer platform for rapid publication of reports through an international journal, which will be available free online until 2012. Its scope, therefore, is broad, inclusive and international, but with a particular focus on Asia Pacific. The Editor welcomes manuscripts in the following key thematic areas in oral and maxillofacial sciences: Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, Conservative Dentistry, Dental Biomaterials, Dental Pedagogy, Endodontics and Traumatology, Implant Dentistry, Oral Biosciences, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Orthodontics, Oral Radiology, Oral Rehabilitation, Paedodontics, Periodontology and Periodontal Medicine.