专家判断在统计推断和循证决策中的作用。

IF 1.8 4区 数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY American Statistician Pub Date : 2019-03-20 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00031305.2018.1529623
Naomi C Brownstein, Thomas A Louis, Anthony O'Hagan, Jane Pendergast
{"title":"专家判断在统计推断和循证决策中的作用。","authors":"Naomi C Brownstein, Thomas A Louis, Anthony O'Hagan, Jane Pendergast","doi":"10.1080/00031305.2018.1529623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article resulted from our participation in the session on the \"role of expert opinion and judgment in statistical inference\" at the October 2017 ASA Symposium on Statistical Inference. We present a strong, unified statement on roles of expert judgment in statistics with processes for obtaining input, whether from a Bayesian or frequentist perspective. Topics include the role of subjectivity in the cycle of scientific inference and decisions, followed by a clinical trial and a greenhouse gas emissions case study that illustrate the role of judgments and the importance of basing them on objective information and a comprehensive uncertainty assessment. We close with a call for increased proactivity and involvement of statisticians in study conceptualization, design, conduct, analysis, and communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":50801,"journal":{"name":"American Statistician","volume":"73 1","pages":"56-68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6474725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Expert Judgment in Statistical Inference and Evidence-Based Decision-Making.\",\"authors\":\"Naomi C Brownstein, Thomas A Louis, Anthony O'Hagan, Jane Pendergast\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00031305.2018.1529623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article resulted from our participation in the session on the \\\"role of expert opinion and judgment in statistical inference\\\" at the October 2017 ASA Symposium on Statistical Inference. We present a strong, unified statement on roles of expert judgment in statistics with processes for obtaining input, whether from a Bayesian or frequentist perspective. Topics include the role of subjectivity in the cycle of scientific inference and decisions, followed by a clinical trial and a greenhouse gas emissions case study that illustrate the role of judgments and the importance of basing them on objective information and a comprehensive uncertainty assessment. We close with a call for increased proactivity and involvement of statisticians in study conceptualization, design, conduct, analysis, and communication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Statistician\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"56-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6474725/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Statistician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1529623\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Statistician","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1529623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是我们参加 2017 年 10 月美国统计学会统计推断专题讨论会 "专家意见和判断在统计推断中的作用 "分会的成果。我们从贝叶斯或频数主义的角度,对专家判断在统计中的作用以及获取输入的过程进行了有力、统一的阐述。主题包括主观性在科学推断和决策周期中的作用,随后的临床试验和温室气体排放案例研究说明了判断的作用以及以客观信息和全面不确定性评估为基础的重要性。最后,我们呼吁统计人员在研究构思、设计、实施、分析和交流过程中更加积极主动地参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Role of Expert Judgment in Statistical Inference and Evidence-Based Decision-Making.

This article resulted from our participation in the session on the "role of expert opinion and judgment in statistical inference" at the October 2017 ASA Symposium on Statistical Inference. We present a strong, unified statement on roles of expert judgment in statistics with processes for obtaining input, whether from a Bayesian or frequentist perspective. Topics include the role of subjectivity in the cycle of scientific inference and decisions, followed by a clinical trial and a greenhouse gas emissions case study that illustrate the role of judgments and the importance of basing them on objective information and a comprehensive uncertainty assessment. We close with a call for increased proactivity and involvement of statisticians in study conceptualization, design, conduct, analysis, and communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Statistician
American Statistician 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Are you looking for general-interest articles about current national and international statistical problems and programs; interesting and fun articles of a general nature about statistics and its applications; or the teaching of statistics? Then you are looking for The American Statistician (TAS), published quarterly by the American Statistical Association. TAS contains timely articles organized into the following sections: Statistical Practice, General, Teacher''s Corner, History Corner, Interdisciplinary, Statistical Computing and Graphics, Reviews of Books and Teaching Materials, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Causal Inference with Complex Surveys: A Unified Perspective on Sample Selection and Exposure Selection Performance Analysis of NSUM Estimators in Social-Network Topologies Cross-validatory Z-Residual for Diagnosing Shared Frailty Models A Pareto tail plot without moment restrictions Sparse-group boosting: Unbiased group and variable selection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1