与公众交流动物研究。

IF 3.1 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Ilar Journal Pub Date : 2019-12-31 DOI:10.1093/ilar/ilz007
Judy MacArthur Clark, Paula Clifford, Wendy Jarrett, Cynthia Pekow
{"title":"与公众交流动物研究。","authors":"Judy MacArthur Clark,&nbsp;Paula Clifford,&nbsp;Wendy Jarrett,&nbsp;Cynthia Pekow","doi":"10.1093/ilar/ilz007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animals play a key role in biomedical research and other areas of scientific inquiry. But public opinion plays a key role in influencing how this area of science is regulated and funded. Nevertheless, scientists have historically been reticent to speak openly about their animal research or to open their animal facilities to the public in any way. Consequently, most of the available information has come from those opposed to animal research. This imbalance has led to suspicion and lagging public support for this work. To reverse this effect, efforts are now being made in many parts of the world to increase openness and transparency in this sector. The authors firmly believe that encouraging more institutions to join this movement, focused on better and greater communication, is essential to preserve the research community's \"permission\" to perform justifiable studies involving animals. For the purposes of this article, we consider \"the public\" to include that cross-section of society who may be asked their views in opinion poll studies and who may vote in elections. It also includes other influential groups such as the media, scientists working in other disciplines, animal welfare groups, and politicians who may shape regulatory frameworks. Public opinion on this issue matters. The majority of funding for biomedical research comes, either directly or indirectly, from the public purse. In the case of pharmaceutical research, funding derives from selling medicines to consumers. We therefore all have a vested interest in this funding. Furthermore, legislation that covers the use of animals in research is permissive-it allows scientists to do things that might otherwise contravene animal welfare laws. But this permission is normally contingent on complying with strict protective measures designed to ensure the work stays within the ethical framework that public opinion has deemed appropriate. Open and transparent communication is the best way to promote public understanding. There is thus a responsibility on all those involved in animal research, whether scientists, animal care staff, physicians, veterinarians, members of ethics committees, or managers and leaders, to support and promote public awareness and trust in this work. Circumstantial evidence shows that, with such open dialogue, there is decreased targeting and harassment of individuals and job pride and satisfaction for all involved is improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":56299,"journal":{"name":"Ilar Journal","volume":"60 1","pages":"34-42"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ilar/ilz007","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communicating About Animal Research with the Public.\",\"authors\":\"Judy MacArthur Clark,&nbsp;Paula Clifford,&nbsp;Wendy Jarrett,&nbsp;Cynthia Pekow\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ilar/ilz007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Animals play a key role in biomedical research and other areas of scientific inquiry. But public opinion plays a key role in influencing how this area of science is regulated and funded. Nevertheless, scientists have historically been reticent to speak openly about their animal research or to open their animal facilities to the public in any way. Consequently, most of the available information has come from those opposed to animal research. This imbalance has led to suspicion and lagging public support for this work. To reverse this effect, efforts are now being made in many parts of the world to increase openness and transparency in this sector. The authors firmly believe that encouraging more institutions to join this movement, focused on better and greater communication, is essential to preserve the research community's \\\"permission\\\" to perform justifiable studies involving animals. For the purposes of this article, we consider \\\"the public\\\" to include that cross-section of society who may be asked their views in opinion poll studies and who may vote in elections. It also includes other influential groups such as the media, scientists working in other disciplines, animal welfare groups, and politicians who may shape regulatory frameworks. Public opinion on this issue matters. The majority of funding for biomedical research comes, either directly or indirectly, from the public purse. In the case of pharmaceutical research, funding derives from selling medicines to consumers. We therefore all have a vested interest in this funding. Furthermore, legislation that covers the use of animals in research is permissive-it allows scientists to do things that might otherwise contravene animal welfare laws. But this permission is normally contingent on complying with strict protective measures designed to ensure the work stays within the ethical framework that public opinion has deemed appropriate. Open and transparent communication is the best way to promote public understanding. There is thus a responsibility on all those involved in animal research, whether scientists, animal care staff, physicians, veterinarians, members of ethics committees, or managers and leaders, to support and promote public awareness and trust in this work. Circumstantial evidence shows that, with such open dialogue, there is decreased targeting and harassment of individuals and job pride and satisfaction for all involved is improved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ilar Journal\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"34-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ilar/ilz007\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ilar Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilz007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ilar Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilz007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

动物在生物医学研究和其他科学探究领域发挥着关键作用。但是,公众舆论在影响这一科学领域的监管和资助方式方面发挥着关键作用。然而,科学家历来都不愿公开谈论他们的动物研究,也不愿以任何方式向公众开放他们的动物设施。因此,大多数可用的信息都来自于那些反对动物研究的人。这种不平衡导致了公众对这项工作的怀疑和滞后支持。为了扭转这种影响,世界许多地方正在努力增加这一部门的公开性和透明度。这组作者坚定地认为,鼓励更多的机构加入这一运动,专注于更好和更广泛的交流,对于保持研究界进行涉及动物的正当研究的“许可”至关重要。为了本文的目的,我们认为“公众”包括可能在民意调查研究中被问及他们的观点和可能在选举中投票的社会的横截面。它还包括其他有影响力的团体,如媒体、在其他学科工作的科学家、动物福利团体和可能塑造监管框架的政治家。公众对这个问题的看法很重要。生物医学研究的大部分资金直接或间接地来自公共财政。就药物研究而言,资金来自向消费者销售药品。因此,我们都对这笔资金有既得利益。此外,有关研究中使用动物的立法是允许的——它允许科学家做一些可能违反动物福利法的事情。但这种许可通常取决于是否遵守严格的保护措施,这些措施旨在确保工作保持在公众舆论认为适当的道德框架内。公开和透明的沟通是促进公众理解的最佳途径。因此,所有参与动物研究的人,无论是科学家、动物护理人员、医生、兽医、伦理委员会成员,还是管理者和领导者,都有责任支持和提高公众对这项工作的认识和信任。间接证据表明,通过这种公开对话,针对个人的攻击和骚扰减少了,所有相关人员的工作自豪感和满意度都得到了提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Communicating About Animal Research with the Public.

Animals play a key role in biomedical research and other areas of scientific inquiry. But public opinion plays a key role in influencing how this area of science is regulated and funded. Nevertheless, scientists have historically been reticent to speak openly about their animal research or to open their animal facilities to the public in any way. Consequently, most of the available information has come from those opposed to animal research. This imbalance has led to suspicion and lagging public support for this work. To reverse this effect, efforts are now being made in many parts of the world to increase openness and transparency in this sector. The authors firmly believe that encouraging more institutions to join this movement, focused on better and greater communication, is essential to preserve the research community's "permission" to perform justifiable studies involving animals. For the purposes of this article, we consider "the public" to include that cross-section of society who may be asked their views in opinion poll studies and who may vote in elections. It also includes other influential groups such as the media, scientists working in other disciplines, animal welfare groups, and politicians who may shape regulatory frameworks. Public opinion on this issue matters. The majority of funding for biomedical research comes, either directly or indirectly, from the public purse. In the case of pharmaceutical research, funding derives from selling medicines to consumers. We therefore all have a vested interest in this funding. Furthermore, legislation that covers the use of animals in research is permissive-it allows scientists to do things that might otherwise contravene animal welfare laws. But this permission is normally contingent on complying with strict protective measures designed to ensure the work stays within the ethical framework that public opinion has deemed appropriate. Open and transparent communication is the best way to promote public understanding. There is thus a responsibility on all those involved in animal research, whether scientists, animal care staff, physicians, veterinarians, members of ethics committees, or managers and leaders, to support and promote public awareness and trust in this work. Circumstantial evidence shows that, with such open dialogue, there is decreased targeting and harassment of individuals and job pride and satisfaction for all involved is improved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ilar Journal
Ilar Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
>18 weeks
期刊介绍: The ILAR Journal is the peer-reviewed, theme-oriented publication of the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR), which provides timely information for all who study, use, care for, and oversee the use of animals in research. The journal publishes original articles that review research on animals either as direct subjects or as surrogates for humans. According to policy, any previously unpublished animal research reported in the ILAR Journal will have been conducted according to the scientific, technical, and humanely appropriate guidelines current at the time the research was conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals or other guidance provided by taxonomically-oriented professional societies (e.g., American Society of Mammalogy) as referenced in the Guide.
期刊最新文献
ILAR: A Retrospective and Prospective Look A Structured Approach to Optimizing Animal Model Selection for Human Translation: The Animal Model Quality Assessment. Livestock and Risk Group 4 Pathogens: Researching Zoonotic Threats to Public Health and Agriculture in Maximum Containment. Fit for Purpose Assessment: A New Direction for IACUCs. Animals as Beneficiaries of Biomedical Research Originally Intended for Humans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1