初级医生对脓毒症的认识与处理。

Sarah L Cowan, Jonathon Aa Holland, Ian Frost, Andrew D Kane
{"title":"初级医生对脓毒症的认识与处理。","authors":"Sarah L Cowan,&nbsp;Jonathon Aa Holland,&nbsp;Ian Frost,&nbsp;Andrew D Kane","doi":"10.7861/futurehosp.3-2-99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is growing evidence that outcomes in sepsis are improved by early recognition and treatment. In this study, we assessed junior doctors' ability to recognise and manage sepsis. We also explored junior doctors' perceptions regarding barriers to delivering timely sepsis care. From 46 respondents, only 4% were able to list the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, 50% could define sepsis and 46% could list the Sepsis Six. Following further teaching on sepsis, 35% could list the SIRS criteria, 87% correctly defined sepsis, and 91% could state the Sepsis Six. Junior doctors perceived time pressure when on call to be the greatest barrier in treating sepsis, and their own knowledge to be the least important barrier. Our data suggest that knowledge of sepsis among junior doctors is poor and that there is a lack of insight into this competency gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":92635,"journal":{"name":"Future hospital journal","volume":"3 2","pages":"99-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465838/pdf/futurehosp-3-2-99.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognition and management of sepsis by junior doctors.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah L Cowan,&nbsp;Jonathon Aa Holland,&nbsp;Ian Frost,&nbsp;Andrew D Kane\",\"doi\":\"10.7861/futurehosp.3-2-99\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is growing evidence that outcomes in sepsis are improved by early recognition and treatment. In this study, we assessed junior doctors' ability to recognise and manage sepsis. We also explored junior doctors' perceptions regarding barriers to delivering timely sepsis care. From 46 respondents, only 4% were able to list the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, 50% could define sepsis and 46% could list the Sepsis Six. Following further teaching on sepsis, 35% could list the SIRS criteria, 87% correctly defined sepsis, and 91% could state the Sepsis Six. Junior doctors perceived time pressure when on call to be the greatest barrier in treating sepsis, and their own knowledge to be the least important barrier. Our data suggest that knowledge of sepsis among junior doctors is poor and that there is a lack of insight into this competency gap.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future hospital journal\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"99-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465838/pdf/futurehosp-3-2-99.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future hospital journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.3-2-99\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future hospital journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.3-2-99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,早期识别和治疗可以改善败血症的预后。在这项研究中,我们评估了初级医生识别和处理败血症的能力。我们还探讨了初级医生对及时提供败血症护理障碍的看法。在46名受访者中,只有4%的人能够列出全身性炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准,50%的人可以定义败血症,46%的人可以列出败血症六级。在脓毒症的进一步教学后,35%的人能列出SIRS标准,87%的人能正确定义脓毒症,91%的人能说出脓毒症六级。初级医生认为随叫随到的时间压力是治疗败血症的最大障碍,而他们自己的知识是最不重要的障碍。我们的数据表明,初级医生对败血症的了解很差,而且缺乏对这种能力差距的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recognition and management of sepsis by junior doctors.

There is growing evidence that outcomes in sepsis are improved by early recognition and treatment. In this study, we assessed junior doctors' ability to recognise and manage sepsis. We also explored junior doctors' perceptions regarding barriers to delivering timely sepsis care. From 46 respondents, only 4% were able to list the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, 50% could define sepsis and 46% could list the Sepsis Six. Following further teaching on sepsis, 35% could list the SIRS criteria, 87% correctly defined sepsis, and 91% could state the Sepsis Six. Junior doctors perceived time pressure when on call to be the greatest barrier in treating sepsis, and their own knowledge to be the least important barrier. Our data suggest that knowledge of sepsis among junior doctors is poor and that there is a lack of insight into this competency gap.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Shifting the focus: A QI project to improve the management of delirium in patients with hip fracture. Raising concerns in the current NHS climate: a qualitative study exploring junior doctors' attitudes to training and teaching. Freedom to speak up - the role of freedom to speak up guardians and the National Guardian's Office in England. Development of a GMC aligned curriculum for internal medicine including a qualitative study of the acceptability of 'capabilities in practice' as a curriculum model. Flipped learning: Turning medical education upside down.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1