内镜下括约肌切开术在抗血栓治疗患者中的安全性:一项回顾性研究。

IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2019-05-16 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2631774519846327
Akira Yamamiya, Katsuya Kitamura, Yu Ishii, Yuta Mitsui, Hitoshi Yoshida
{"title":"内镜下括约肌切开术在抗血栓治疗患者中的安全性:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Akira Yamamiya,&nbsp;Katsuya Kitamura,&nbsp;Yu Ishii,&nbsp;Yuta Mitsui,&nbsp;Hitoshi Yoshida","doi":"10.1177/2631774519846327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2014 to December 2016, a single-center retrospective study was conducted. Of the 80 patients with naïve papilla receiving antithrombotic treatment who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy, 76 patients were retrospectively analyzed. We divided the participants into two groups as follows: 45 patients who discontinued antithrombotic treatment (discontinuation group) and 31 patients who continued antithrombotic treatment (continuation group). We evaluated the safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with naïve papilla who received antithrombotic treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of patients requiring emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the continuation group was significantly higher than that in the discontinuation group (55% vs 11%; <i>p</i> = 0.001). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. Neither bleeding nor perforation occurred in either group. The length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment may be safe if the guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment are followed.</p>","PeriodicalId":40947,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"12 ","pages":"2631774519846327"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2631774519846327","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Akira Yamamiya,&nbsp;Katsuya Kitamura,&nbsp;Yu Ishii,&nbsp;Yuta Mitsui,&nbsp;Hitoshi Yoshida\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2631774519846327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2014 to December 2016, a single-center retrospective study was conducted. Of the 80 patients with naïve papilla receiving antithrombotic treatment who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy, 76 patients were retrospectively analyzed. We divided the participants into two groups as follows: 45 patients who discontinued antithrombotic treatment (discontinuation group) and 31 patients who continued antithrombotic treatment (continuation group). We evaluated the safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with naïve papilla who received antithrombotic treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of patients requiring emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the continuation group was significantly higher than that in the discontinuation group (55% vs 11%; <i>p</i> = 0.001). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. Neither bleeding nor perforation occurred in either group. The length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment may be safe if the guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment are followed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"2631774519846327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2631774519846327\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2631774519846327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2631774519846327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:本研究探讨了内镜下括约肌切开术在接受抗血栓治疗的患者中的安全性。方法:2014年1月至2016年12月进行单中心回顾性研究。在接受抗血栓治疗的80例naïve乳头患者中,有76例患者接受了内窥镜括约肌切开术。我们将参与者分为两组:45名停止抗血栓治疗的患者(停药组)和31名继续抗血栓治疗的患者(继续组)。我们评估了内窥镜下括约肌切开术对接受抗血栓治疗的naïve乳头患者的安全性。结果:继续组需要急诊内镜逆行胆管造影的患者比例显著高于停药组(55% vs 11%;p = 0.001)。两组不良事件发生率无显著差异。两组均未发生出血和穿孔。两组患者住院时间无显著差异。结论:如果在接受抗血栓治疗的患者中遵循胃肠内镜指南,内镜下括约肌切开术可能是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment: a retrospective study.

Background: This study investigated the safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment.

Methods: From January 2014 to December 2016, a single-center retrospective study was conducted. Of the 80 patients with naïve papilla receiving antithrombotic treatment who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy, 76 patients were retrospectively analyzed. We divided the participants into two groups as follows: 45 patients who discontinued antithrombotic treatment (discontinuation group) and 31 patients who continued antithrombotic treatment (continuation group). We evaluated the safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with naïve papilla who received antithrombotic treatment.

Results: The percentage of patients requiring emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the continuation group was significantly higher than that in the discontinuation group (55% vs 11%; p = 0.001). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. Neither bleeding nor perforation occurred in either group. The length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusions: Endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment may be safe if the guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment are followed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided placement of lumen-apposing metal stent for transgastric drainage of loculated malignant ascites. Effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided simple puncture-aspiration (non-stenting) in the management of abdominal collections. Causes of intraprocedural discomfort in colonoscopy: a review and practical tips. Retrograde colon imaging through colonic transendoscopic enteral tubing helps to confirm the cause of difficult colonoscopy: a case report. Total mesorectal excision after rectal-sparing approach in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant treatment: a high volume center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1