波纹肌上纤毛和肌前肌切除术与内窥镜提眉效果的关系。

Sidney J Starkman, David A Sherris
{"title":"波纹肌上纤毛和肌前肌切除术与内窥镜提眉效果的关系。","authors":"Sidney J Starkman,&nbsp;David A Sherris","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2018.2084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Glabellar wrinkling is a critical component of upper facial aging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the long-term outcomes on the wrinkle lines of the glabella and forehead following browlifts with vs without corrugator and procerus muscle resection.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A prospective cohort comparative trial was conducted of 23 patients who underwent browlift procedures by a single surgeon at a single institution (16 with glabellar muscle resection and 7 without muscle resection) between May 1, 2016, and July 1, 2017. All analysis took place between May 1, 2016, and May 14, 2018. The mean follow-up period was 16 months (range, 12-21 months). Sixteen of the 23 patients underwent a browlift with muscle resection procedure alone or in combination with other facial rejuvenation procedures to the brow, midface, jowl, and neck. Four of the 23 patients underwent browlifts only, and 19 had browlifts with other procedures. Seven of the 23 patients had browlift procedures without muscle resection and were designated as controls.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Endoscopic browlift surgery was performed either with procerus and corrugator muscle resection or without muscle resection.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Neutral gaze and dynamic photographs of the upper face obtained preoperatively and after the 1-year postoperative mark were reviewed and scored in a blinded fashion by 2 physicians not affiliated with the study team using a modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Assessment score (FWA; from 0 [no wrinkling] to 5 [deep wrinkling with redundant skin]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 23 study patients had a mean age of 60 years (range, 48-74 years); 21 were women, and 2 were men. There was a significant difference between the myectomy and control groups in the 12-month postoperative improvement in dynamic glabellar FWA scores (2.56 vs 1.07, P = .01). There was a difference between the myectomy and control groups in the improvements in resting glabellar FWA scores at 12-month follow-up, but it did not reach statistical significance (1.28 vs 1.00, P = .38). The 12-month postoperative improvements in dynamic (1.19 vs 1.29, P = .86) and resting forehead (1.0 vs 1.1, P = .70) FWA scores were not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, the use of procerus and corrugator myectomy techniques appeared to achieve a superior long-term reduction in glabellar wrinkles vs forehead rejuvenation techniques without muscle resection.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":"21 5","pages":"375-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.2084","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Corrugator Supercilii and Procerus Myectomy With Endoscopic Browlift Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Sidney J Starkman,&nbsp;David A Sherris\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamafacial.2018.2084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Glabellar wrinkling is a critical component of upper facial aging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the long-term outcomes on the wrinkle lines of the glabella and forehead following browlifts with vs without corrugator and procerus muscle resection.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A prospective cohort comparative trial was conducted of 23 patients who underwent browlift procedures by a single surgeon at a single institution (16 with glabellar muscle resection and 7 without muscle resection) between May 1, 2016, and July 1, 2017. All analysis took place between May 1, 2016, and May 14, 2018. The mean follow-up period was 16 months (range, 12-21 months). Sixteen of the 23 patients underwent a browlift with muscle resection procedure alone or in combination with other facial rejuvenation procedures to the brow, midface, jowl, and neck. Four of the 23 patients underwent browlifts only, and 19 had browlifts with other procedures. Seven of the 23 patients had browlift procedures without muscle resection and were designated as controls.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Endoscopic browlift surgery was performed either with procerus and corrugator muscle resection or without muscle resection.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Neutral gaze and dynamic photographs of the upper face obtained preoperatively and after the 1-year postoperative mark were reviewed and scored in a blinded fashion by 2 physicians not affiliated with the study team using a modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Assessment score (FWA; from 0 [no wrinkling] to 5 [deep wrinkling with redundant skin]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 23 study patients had a mean age of 60 years (range, 48-74 years); 21 were women, and 2 were men. There was a significant difference between the myectomy and control groups in the 12-month postoperative improvement in dynamic glabellar FWA scores (2.56 vs 1.07, P = .01). There was a difference between the myectomy and control groups in the improvements in resting glabellar FWA scores at 12-month follow-up, but it did not reach statistical significance (1.28 vs 1.00, P = .38). The 12-month postoperative improvements in dynamic (1.19 vs 1.29, P = .86) and resting forehead (1.0 vs 1.1, P = .70) FWA scores were not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, the use of procerus and corrugator myectomy techniques appeared to achieve a superior long-term reduction in glabellar wrinkles vs forehead rejuvenation techniques without muscle resection.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA facial plastic surgery\",\"volume\":\"21 5\",\"pages\":\"375-380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.2084\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA facial plastic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.2084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.2084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

重要性:眉间皱纹是上面部衰老的重要组成部分。目的:比较眉间提皱术与不切除眉间肌和前睑肌术后眉间和前额皱纹的远期疗效。设计、环境和参与者:在2016年5月1日至2017年7月1日期间,一项前瞻性队列比较试验对23名患者进行了一项前瞻性队列比较试验,这些患者由一名外科医生在同一家机构进行了眉提手术(16例切除了眉间肌,7例未切除肌肉)。所有分析都发生在2016年5月1日至2018年5月14日之间。平均随访16个月(范围12-21个月)。23名患者中有16名接受了单独的肌肉切除手术或联合其他面部年轻化手术,包括眉毛、中脸、下巴和颈部。在23名患者中,有4名患者仅接受了眼部提拉手术,19名患者接受了其他手术。23例患者中有7例进行了未切除肌肉的提眉手术,并被指定为对照组。干预措施:内窥镜下的眉提手术可以切除前肌和瓦楞肌,也可以不切除肌肉。主要结果和测量方法:由2名非研究小组的医生对术前和术后1年后获得的上脸中性凝视和动态照片进行盲法评估和评分,采用改进的Fitzpatrick皱纹评估评分(FWA);从0[无起皱]到5[有多余皮肤的深度起皱])。结果:23例研究患者平均年龄60岁(范围48-74岁);21名女性,2名男性。术后12个月,myectomy组和control组动态glabellar FWA评分的改善有显著性差异(2.56 vs 1.07, P = 0.01)。随访12个月时,myectomy组与control组间静息glabellar FWA评分的改善有差异,但差异无统计学意义(1.28 vs 1.00, P = 0.38)。术后12个月动态FWA评分(1.19 vs 1.29, P = 0.86)和静息额FWA评分(1.0 vs 1.1, P = 0.70)的改善无显著差异。结论和相关性:在这项研究中,与不切除肌肉的前额年轻化技术相比,使用眉间肌和瓦楞肌切除术技术在长期减少眉间皱纹方面表现优异。证据等级:3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of Corrugator Supercilii and Procerus Myectomy With Endoscopic Browlift Outcomes.

Importance: Glabellar wrinkling is a critical component of upper facial aging.

Objective: To compare the long-term outcomes on the wrinkle lines of the glabella and forehead following browlifts with vs without corrugator and procerus muscle resection.

Design, setting, and participants: A prospective cohort comparative trial was conducted of 23 patients who underwent browlift procedures by a single surgeon at a single institution (16 with glabellar muscle resection and 7 without muscle resection) between May 1, 2016, and July 1, 2017. All analysis took place between May 1, 2016, and May 14, 2018. The mean follow-up period was 16 months (range, 12-21 months). Sixteen of the 23 patients underwent a browlift with muscle resection procedure alone or in combination with other facial rejuvenation procedures to the brow, midface, jowl, and neck. Four of the 23 patients underwent browlifts only, and 19 had browlifts with other procedures. Seven of the 23 patients had browlift procedures without muscle resection and were designated as controls.

Interventions: Endoscopic browlift surgery was performed either with procerus and corrugator muscle resection or without muscle resection.

Main outcomes and measures: Neutral gaze and dynamic photographs of the upper face obtained preoperatively and after the 1-year postoperative mark were reviewed and scored in a blinded fashion by 2 physicians not affiliated with the study team using a modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Assessment score (FWA; from 0 [no wrinkling] to 5 [deep wrinkling with redundant skin]).

Results: The 23 study patients had a mean age of 60 years (range, 48-74 years); 21 were women, and 2 were men. There was a significant difference between the myectomy and control groups in the 12-month postoperative improvement in dynamic glabellar FWA scores (2.56 vs 1.07, P = .01). There was a difference between the myectomy and control groups in the improvements in resting glabellar FWA scores at 12-month follow-up, but it did not reach statistical significance (1.28 vs 1.00, P = .38). The 12-month postoperative improvements in dynamic (1.19 vs 1.29, P = .86) and resting forehead (1.0 vs 1.1, P = .70) FWA scores were not significantly different.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, the use of procerus and corrugator myectomy techniques appeared to achieve a superior long-term reduction in glabellar wrinkles vs forehead rejuvenation techniques without muscle resection.

Level of evidence: 3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine (Formerly, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery) is a multispecialty journal with a key mission to provide physicians and providers with the most accurate and innovative information in the discipline of facial plastic (reconstructive and cosmetic) interventions.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery. Clarification of a Suspension Technique for Unstable Nasal Bones. Masseteric-to-Facial Nerve Transfer and Selective Neurectomy for Rehabilitation of the Synkinetic Smile. A Practical Precaution Relevant to Facial Injections. Effect of a Vibratory Anesthetic Device on Pain Anticipation and Subsequent Pain Perception Among Patients Undergoing Cutaneous Cancer Removal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1