膝关节手术后最大力量的简化测量:基于应用的膝关节训练装置与等速测试的比较。

IF 1.3 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2020-01-22 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAJSM.S214598
Hauke Horstmann, Pascal Medico, Florian Lasch, Werner Krutsch, Thomas Sanjay Weber-Spickschen
{"title":"膝关节手术后最大力量的简化测量:基于应用的膝关节训练装置与等速测试的比较。","authors":"Hauke Horstmann,&nbsp;Pascal Medico,&nbsp;Florian Lasch,&nbsp;Werner Krutsch,&nbsp;Thomas Sanjay Weber-Spickschen","doi":"10.2147/OAJSM.S214598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Isokinetic testing is used as a standard tool in measuring strength in professional athletes. It is often used to evaluate improvement during rehabilitation. The disadvantages of isokinetic testing include its costs, the fact that it is not portable, and its risk of injury, which makes it not suitable for early postoperative rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the results of the isokinetic testing and the measurements of an application-based knee-training device.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Exploratory diagnostic study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this monocentric study, 100 subjects performed an isokinetic maximum strength examination and an assessment on the application-based knee-training device in a randomized order. The isokinetic testing was based on the Swiss Olympic protocol with 3 sets of 5 repetitions of maximum strength testing for flexion and extension. The subjects consisted of 50 healthy professional athletes and 50 healthy recreational athletes, half male and half female, between the ages of 18 to 30 years old.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No medical or technical issues were reported. The analysis of the relationship between application-based knee-training device and extension showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of r=0.667 for the left knee and r=0.604 for the right knee. For flexion, the Pearson correlation coefficient was r=0.640 for the left side and r=0.673 for the right side. When strength measured by the application-based knee-training device was adjusted for height and weight of the subjects, the Pearson correlation was even stronger (extension left: r=0.727, right: r=0.689; flexion left: r=0.641, right: r=0.711).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study shows a moderate to high correlation between isokinetic testing and the application-based knee-training device. These results suggest that the application-based knee-training device is effective for early strength rehabilitation without the risk of injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":51644,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"43-49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAJSM.S214598","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplified Measurement of Maximum Strength After Knee Surgery: Application-Based Knee-Training Device Compared to Isokinetic Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Hauke Horstmann,&nbsp;Pascal Medico,&nbsp;Florian Lasch,&nbsp;Werner Krutsch,&nbsp;Thomas Sanjay Weber-Spickschen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OAJSM.S214598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Isokinetic testing is used as a standard tool in measuring strength in professional athletes. It is often used to evaluate improvement during rehabilitation. The disadvantages of isokinetic testing include its costs, the fact that it is not portable, and its risk of injury, which makes it not suitable for early postoperative rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the results of the isokinetic testing and the measurements of an application-based knee-training device.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Exploratory diagnostic study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this monocentric study, 100 subjects performed an isokinetic maximum strength examination and an assessment on the application-based knee-training device in a randomized order. The isokinetic testing was based on the Swiss Olympic protocol with 3 sets of 5 repetitions of maximum strength testing for flexion and extension. The subjects consisted of 50 healthy professional athletes and 50 healthy recreational athletes, half male and half female, between the ages of 18 to 30 years old.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No medical or technical issues were reported. The analysis of the relationship between application-based knee-training device and extension showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of r=0.667 for the left knee and r=0.604 for the right knee. For flexion, the Pearson correlation coefficient was r=0.640 for the left side and r=0.673 for the right side. When strength measured by the application-based knee-training device was adjusted for height and weight of the subjects, the Pearson correlation was even stronger (extension left: r=0.727, right: r=0.689; flexion left: r=0.641, right: r=0.711).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study shows a moderate to high correlation between isokinetic testing and the application-based knee-training device. These results suggest that the application-based knee-training device is effective for early strength rehabilitation without the risk of injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"43-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAJSM.S214598\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S214598\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S214598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:等速测试被用作衡量专业运动员力量的标准工具。它通常用于评估康复期间的改善情况。等速测试的缺点包括成本高、不便携、存在损伤风险,不适合术后早期康复。假设:本研究的目的是研究等速测试结果与基于应用的膝关节训练装置测量之间的关系。研究设计:探索性诊断研究。方法:在这项单中心研究中,100名受试者按随机顺序进行了等速最大力量检查和基于应用的膝关节训练装置评估。等速测试是根据瑞士奥林匹克协议进行的,包括3组5次的屈曲和伸展最大强度测试。研究对象为50名健康职业运动员和50名健康休闲运动员,男女各占一半,年龄在18 ~ 30岁之间。结果:未报告任何医疗或技术问题。基于应用的膝关节训练装置与伸展的关系分析显示,左膝的Pearson相关系数为r=0.667,右膝的Pearson相关系数为r=0.604。对于屈曲,左侧的Pearson相关系数为r=0.640,右侧为r=0.673。当基于应用的膝关节训练装置测量的力量根据受试者的身高和体重进行调整时,Pearson相关性更强(左扩展:r=0.727,右扩展:r=0.689;左屈:r=0.641,右屈:r=0.711)。结论:该研究显示等速测试与基于应用的膝关节训练装置之间存在中等到高度的相关性。这些结果表明,基于应用的膝关节训练装置对早期力量康复是有效的,没有损伤的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simplified Measurement of Maximum Strength After Knee Surgery: Application-Based Knee-Training Device Compared to Isokinetic Testing.

Context: Isokinetic testing is used as a standard tool in measuring strength in professional athletes. It is often used to evaluate improvement during rehabilitation. The disadvantages of isokinetic testing include its costs, the fact that it is not portable, and its risk of injury, which makes it not suitable for early postoperative rehabilitation.

Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the results of the isokinetic testing and the measurements of an application-based knee-training device.

Study design: Exploratory diagnostic study.

Methods: In this monocentric study, 100 subjects performed an isokinetic maximum strength examination and an assessment on the application-based knee-training device in a randomized order. The isokinetic testing was based on the Swiss Olympic protocol with 3 sets of 5 repetitions of maximum strength testing for flexion and extension. The subjects consisted of 50 healthy professional athletes and 50 healthy recreational athletes, half male and half female, between the ages of 18 to 30 years old.

Results: No medical or technical issues were reported. The analysis of the relationship between application-based knee-training device and extension showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of r=0.667 for the left knee and r=0.604 for the right knee. For flexion, the Pearson correlation coefficient was r=0.640 for the left side and r=0.673 for the right side. When strength measured by the application-based knee-training device was adjusted for height and weight of the subjects, the Pearson correlation was even stronger (extension left: r=0.727, right: r=0.689; flexion left: r=0.641, right: r=0.711).

Conclusion: The study shows a moderate to high correlation between isokinetic testing and the application-based knee-training device. These results suggest that the application-based knee-training device is effective for early strength rehabilitation without the risk of injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Short-Term Intermittent Normobaric Hypoxia Combined with Light Exercise Improves Acclimatization of Cardiorespiratory Function in Inactive Adults. Microbial Champions: The Influence of Gut Microbiota on Athletic Performance via the Gut-Brain Axis. Video Analysis of Elite American Football Athletes During Vertical Jump. Exercise into Pain in Chronic Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 6-Month Follow-Up. Achilles Tendon Pain in Male Professional Football Players - A Prospective Five-Season Study of 88 Injuries from the UEFA Elite Club Injury Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1