认知增强中的神经伦理问题:莫达非尼作为工作场所用药的例子?

Brain and neuroscience advances Pub Date : 2019-02-15 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2398212818816018
Annette B Brühl, Camilla d'Angelo, Barbara J Sahakian
{"title":"认知增强中的神经伦理问题:莫达非尼作为工作场所用药的例子?","authors":"Annette B Brühl,&nbsp;Camilla d'Angelo,&nbsp;Barbara J Sahakian","doi":"10.1177/2398212818816018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by healthy individuals has been a feature for much of recorded history. Cocaine and amphetamine are modern cases of drugs initially enthusiastically acclaimed for enhancing cognition and mood. Today, an increasing number of healthy people are reported to use cognitive-enhancing drugs, as well as other interventions, such as non-invasive brain stimulation, to maintain or improve work performance. Cognitive-enhancing drugs, such as methylphenidate and modafinil, which were developed as treatments, are increasingly being used by healthy people. Modafinil not only affects 'cold' cognition, but also improves 'hot' cognition, such as emotion recognition and task-related motivation. The lifestyle use of 'smart drugs' raises both safety concerns as well as ethical issues, including coercion and increasing disparity in society. As a society, we need to consider which forms of cognitive enhancement (e.g. pharmacological, exercise, lifelong learning) are acceptable and for which groups under what conditions and by what methods we would wish to improve and flourish.</p>","PeriodicalId":72444,"journal":{"name":"Brain and neuroscience advances","volume":" ","pages":"2398212818816018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2398212818816018","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuroethical issues in cognitive enhancement: Modafinil as the example of a workplace drug?\",\"authors\":\"Annette B Brühl,&nbsp;Camilla d'Angelo,&nbsp;Barbara J Sahakian\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2398212818816018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by healthy individuals has been a feature for much of recorded history. Cocaine and amphetamine are modern cases of drugs initially enthusiastically acclaimed for enhancing cognition and mood. Today, an increasing number of healthy people are reported to use cognitive-enhancing drugs, as well as other interventions, such as non-invasive brain stimulation, to maintain or improve work performance. Cognitive-enhancing drugs, such as methylphenidate and modafinil, which were developed as treatments, are increasingly being used by healthy people. Modafinil not only affects 'cold' cognition, but also improves 'hot' cognition, such as emotion recognition and task-related motivation. The lifestyle use of 'smart drugs' raises both safety concerns as well as ethical issues, including coercion and increasing disparity in society. As a society, we need to consider which forms of cognitive enhancement (e.g. pharmacological, exercise, lifelong learning) are acceptable and for which groups under what conditions and by what methods we would wish to improve and flourish.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and neuroscience advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2398212818816018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2398212818816018\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and neuroscience advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2398212818816018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and neuroscience advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2398212818816018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

健康人使用增强认知能力的药物已经成为历史上的一大特征。可卡因和安非他命是现代毒品的例子,它们最初因增强认知和情绪而受到热烈欢迎。今天,据报道,越来越多的健康人使用增强认知能力的药物以及其他干预措施,如非侵入性脑刺激,来维持或改善工作表现。增强认知能力的药物,如哌甲酯和莫达非尼,是作为治疗手段开发出来的,越来越多的健康人使用这些药物。莫达非尼不仅影响“冷”认知,还能改善“热”认知,如情绪识别和任务相关动机。在生活方式上使用“聪明药”不仅引发了安全问题,也引发了道德问题,包括强迫和社会差距的扩大。作为一个社会,我们需要考虑哪些形式的认知增强(例如药物,运动,终身学习)是可以接受的,哪些群体在什么条件下,通过什么方法,我们希望改善和繁荣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neuroethical issues in cognitive enhancement: Modafinil as the example of a workplace drug?

The use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by healthy individuals has been a feature for much of recorded history. Cocaine and amphetamine are modern cases of drugs initially enthusiastically acclaimed for enhancing cognition and mood. Today, an increasing number of healthy people are reported to use cognitive-enhancing drugs, as well as other interventions, such as non-invasive brain stimulation, to maintain or improve work performance. Cognitive-enhancing drugs, such as methylphenidate and modafinil, which were developed as treatments, are increasingly being used by healthy people. Modafinil not only affects 'cold' cognition, but also improves 'hot' cognition, such as emotion recognition and task-related motivation. The lifestyle use of 'smart drugs' raises both safety concerns as well as ethical issues, including coercion and increasing disparity in society. As a society, we need to consider which forms of cognitive enhancement (e.g. pharmacological, exercise, lifelong learning) are acceptable and for which groups under what conditions and by what methods we would wish to improve and flourish.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review of the gastric physiology of disgust: Proto-nausea as an under-explored facet of the gut-brain axis. From neurophobia to neurophilia: Fostering confidence and passion for neurology in medical students. Are all neuroscience degrees the same? A comparison of undergraduate neuroscience degrees across the United Kingdom. Centralising a loss of consciousness to the central medial thalamus. Genetically modified animals as models of neurodevelopmental conditions: A review of systematic review reporting quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1