在中国进行队列研究,评估在产品使用的第三、第四和第五年双棒避孕植入物的有效性、安全性和可接受性

Q2 Medicine Contraception: X Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.conx.2019.100008
Y Che , D Taylor , D Luo , LY Maldonado , M Wang , S Wevill , H Vahdat , X Han , V Halpern , L Dorflinger , MJ Steiner
{"title":"在中国进行队列研究,评估在产品使用的第三、第四和第五年双棒避孕植入物的有效性、安全性和可接受性","authors":"Y Che ,&nbsp;D Taylor ,&nbsp;D Luo ,&nbsp;LY Maldonado ,&nbsp;M Wang ,&nbsp;S Wevill ,&nbsp;H Vahdat ,&nbsp;X Han ,&nbsp;V Halpern ,&nbsp;L Dorflinger ,&nbsp;MJ Steiner","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2019.100008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Sino-implant (II) is a contraceptive implant approved for 4 years of use in China. We evaluated the contraceptive efficacy during the third, fourth and fifth year, and assessed additional pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and acceptability endpoints.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We enrolled a cohort of 255 current Sino-Implant (II) users entering their third year and a second cohort of 243 users entering their fourth year. We followed these two cohorts for 12 and 24 months, respectively. To characterize PK endpoints (i.e. levonorgestrel (LNG), sex hormone binding globulin and free LNG index) over 5 years, we collected blood samples in a subset of 50 participants we followed during the third, fourth and fifth year. We also enrolled small cohorts (n = 20) of Sino-implant (II) users entering their sixth month and second year and followed them each for up to 6 months. Our primary efficacy measures were the pregnancy Pearl Indices during Year 3 and 4. Secondary objectives included assessments of PK, safety, acceptability and efficacy in the fifth year.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We recorded four pregnancies, with a higher pregnancy rate during Year 3 [1.34 (95% CI: 0.28–3.93)] than Year 4 [0.44 (95% CI: 0.01–2.47)] or Year 5 [0.00 (95% CI: 0.00–2.02)]. The overall pregnancy rate for the third, fourth and fifth years of product use was 0.63 per 100 WY; 95% CI: (0.17–1.62). Mean LNG concentrations remained well above 200 pg/mL (Year 3 = 280.9; Year 4 = 233.6; Year 5 = 270.6). Most participants (93.7%) described their bleeding pattern as acceptable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Sino-implant (II) is a highly effective contraceptive method in this population of Chinese women over 5 years.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Sino-implant (II) is a highly effective contraceptive method with an estimated Pearl Index of less than 1% over the third, fourth and fifth years of use in a population of Chinese women of reproductive age.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100008"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2019.100008","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cohort study to evaluate efficacy, safety and acceptability of a two-rod contraceptive implant during third, fourth and fifth year of product use in China\",\"authors\":\"Y Che ,&nbsp;D Taylor ,&nbsp;D Luo ,&nbsp;LY Maldonado ,&nbsp;M Wang ,&nbsp;S Wevill ,&nbsp;H Vahdat ,&nbsp;X Han ,&nbsp;V Halpern ,&nbsp;L Dorflinger ,&nbsp;MJ Steiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conx.2019.100008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Sino-implant (II) is a contraceptive implant approved for 4 years of use in China. We evaluated the contraceptive efficacy during the third, fourth and fifth year, and assessed additional pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and acceptability endpoints.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We enrolled a cohort of 255 current Sino-Implant (II) users entering their third year and a second cohort of 243 users entering their fourth year. We followed these two cohorts for 12 and 24 months, respectively. To characterize PK endpoints (i.e. levonorgestrel (LNG), sex hormone binding globulin and free LNG index) over 5 years, we collected blood samples in a subset of 50 participants we followed during the third, fourth and fifth year. We also enrolled small cohorts (n = 20) of Sino-implant (II) users entering their sixth month and second year and followed them each for up to 6 months. Our primary efficacy measures were the pregnancy Pearl Indices during Year 3 and 4. Secondary objectives included assessments of PK, safety, acceptability and efficacy in the fifth year.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We recorded four pregnancies, with a higher pregnancy rate during Year 3 [1.34 (95% CI: 0.28–3.93)] than Year 4 [0.44 (95% CI: 0.01–2.47)] or Year 5 [0.00 (95% CI: 0.00–2.02)]. The overall pregnancy rate for the third, fourth and fifth years of product use was 0.63 per 100 WY; 95% CI: (0.17–1.62). Mean LNG concentrations remained well above 200 pg/mL (Year 3 = 280.9; Year 4 = 233.6; Year 5 = 270.6). Most participants (93.7%) described their bleeding pattern as acceptable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Sino-implant (II) is a highly effective contraceptive method in this population of Chinese women over 5 years.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Sino-implant (II) is a highly effective contraceptive method with an estimated Pearl Index of less than 1% over the third, fourth and fifth years of use in a population of Chinese women of reproductive age.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception: X\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100008\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2019.100008\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151619300073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151619300073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的ino-implant (II)是中国批准使用4年的避孕植入物。我们评估了第三、第四和第五年的避孕效果,并评估了额外的药代动力学(PK)、安全性和可接受性终点。研究设计:我们招募了255名目前使用Sino-Implant (II)的患者进入第三年,第二组纳入243名进入第四年的患者。我们分别对这两个队列进行了12个月和24个 月的随访。为了描述5年内的PK终点(即左炔诺孕酮(LNG)、性激素结合球蛋白和游离LNG指数),我们收集了50名参与者的血液样本,并在第三、第四和第五年进行了随访。我们还招募了进入第6个月和第二年的Sino-implant (II)使用者的小队列(n = 20),并对他们进行了长达6个月的随访。我们的主要疗效指标是第3年和第4年的妊娠珍珠指数。次要目标包括第五年的PK、安全性、可接受性和有效性评估。结果本组共记录4例妊娠,3年级妊娠率[1.34 (95% CI: 0.28-3.93)]高于4年级[0.44 (95% CI: 0.01-2.47)]和5年级[0.00 (95% CI: 0.00 - 2.02)]。使用该产品的第三、第四和第五年的总体妊娠率为0.63 / 100 WY;95% ci: 0.17-1.62。平均LNG浓度保持在200 pg/mL以上(第三年 = 280.9;年4 = 233.6;年5 = 270.6)。大多数参与者(93.7%)认为他们的出血模式是可以接受的。结论在中国5岁以上妇女中,植入体(II)是一种非常有效的避孕方法。中国育龄妇女在使用第三、第四和第五年的珍珠指数估计小于1%,是一种非常有效的避孕方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cohort study to evaluate efficacy, safety and acceptability of a two-rod contraceptive implant during third, fourth and fifth year of product use in China

Objective

Sino-implant (II) is a contraceptive implant approved for 4 years of use in China. We evaluated the contraceptive efficacy during the third, fourth and fifth year, and assessed additional pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and acceptability endpoints.

Study design

We enrolled a cohort of 255 current Sino-Implant (II) users entering their third year and a second cohort of 243 users entering their fourth year. We followed these two cohorts for 12 and 24 months, respectively. To characterize PK endpoints (i.e. levonorgestrel (LNG), sex hormone binding globulin and free LNG index) over 5 years, we collected blood samples in a subset of 50 participants we followed during the third, fourth and fifth year. We also enrolled small cohorts (n = 20) of Sino-implant (II) users entering their sixth month and second year and followed them each for up to 6 months. Our primary efficacy measures were the pregnancy Pearl Indices during Year 3 and 4. Secondary objectives included assessments of PK, safety, acceptability and efficacy in the fifth year.

Results

We recorded four pregnancies, with a higher pregnancy rate during Year 3 [1.34 (95% CI: 0.28–3.93)] than Year 4 [0.44 (95% CI: 0.01–2.47)] or Year 5 [0.00 (95% CI: 0.00–2.02)]. The overall pregnancy rate for the third, fourth and fifth years of product use was 0.63 per 100 WY; 95% CI: (0.17–1.62). Mean LNG concentrations remained well above 200 pg/mL (Year 3 = 280.9; Year 4 = 233.6; Year 5 = 270.6). Most participants (93.7%) described their bleeding pattern as acceptable.

Conclusion

Sino-implant (II) is a highly effective contraceptive method in this population of Chinese women over 5 years.

Implications

Sino-implant (II) is a highly effective contraceptive method with an estimated Pearl Index of less than 1% over the third, fourth and fifth years of use in a population of Chinese women of reproductive age.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Outpatient medical management of later second trimester abortion (18–23.6 weeks) with procedural evacuation backup: A large case series Experiences of delay-causing obstacles and mental health at the time of abortion seeking Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use How does person-centered maternity care relate to postpartum contraceptive counseling and use? Evidence from a longitudinal study of women delivering at health facilities in Ethiopia Dilation and evacuation versus medication abortion at 15–24 weeks of gestation in low-middle income country: A retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1