持续椎旁阻断输注类型对视频胸腔镜手术疼痛管理的影响:一项试点研究。

M Gabriel Hillegass, Ryan H Nobles, Bethany J Wolf, George J Guldan
{"title":"持续椎旁阻断输注类型对视频胸腔镜手术疼痛管理的影响:一项试点研究。","authors":"M Gabriel Hillegass,&nbsp;Ryan H Nobles,&nbsp;Bethany J Wolf,&nbsp;George J Guldan","doi":"10.28967/jarpm.2017.01.17001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This pilot study was designed to examine the impact of two different (PVB) infusion types compared to a control (no PVB) on pain management in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Acute and chronic pain over time, perioperative oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption and patient satisfaction were measured. A protracted enrollment period and participant attrition precluded target enrollment and subsequent power analysis. Further, there was no increased efficacy of the intervention groups over the control group. In fact, the patient-controlled analgesia only group (control) had lower mean and median MME consumption postoperatively. Pain and patient satisfaction scores were similar among all treatment groups at all time points assessed. We characterize our study population, report our results for each treatment group and highlight challenges encountered and lessons learned to aid in the development of future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":93016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of anesthetic research and pain medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7272033/pdf/nihms-1579262.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of continuous paravertebral blockade infusion type on pain management over time for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"M Gabriel Hillegass,&nbsp;Ryan H Nobles,&nbsp;Bethany J Wolf,&nbsp;George J Guldan\",\"doi\":\"10.28967/jarpm.2017.01.17001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This pilot study was designed to examine the impact of two different (PVB) infusion types compared to a control (no PVB) on pain management in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Acute and chronic pain over time, perioperative oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption and patient satisfaction were measured. A protracted enrollment period and participant attrition precluded target enrollment and subsequent power analysis. Further, there was no increased efficacy of the intervention groups over the control group. In fact, the patient-controlled analgesia only group (control) had lower mean and median MME consumption postoperatively. Pain and patient satisfaction scores were similar among all treatment groups at all time points assessed. We characterize our study population, report our results for each treatment group and highlight challenges encountered and lessons learned to aid in the development of future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of anesthetic research and pain medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7272033/pdf/nihms-1579262.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of anesthetic research and pain medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28967/jarpm.2017.01.17001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/3/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of anesthetic research and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28967/jarpm.2017.01.17001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本初步研究旨在检查两种不同(PVB)输注类型与对照组(无PVB)对视频辅助胸腔镜手术疼痛管理的影响。测量急性和慢性疼痛随时间的变化,围手术期口服吗啡毫克当量(MME)的消耗和患者满意度。长期的入组期和参与者的减员妨碍了目标入组和随后的功效分析。此外,与对照组相比,干预组的疗效并没有增加。事实上,患者自控镇痛组(对照组)术后MME消耗的平均值和中位数较低。所有治疗组在所有时间点的疼痛和患者满意度评分相似。我们描述了我们的研究人群,报告了每个治疗组的结果,并强调了遇到的挑战和吸取的教训,以帮助未来研究的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of continuous paravertebral blockade infusion type on pain management over time for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a pilot study.

This pilot study was designed to examine the impact of two different (PVB) infusion types compared to a control (no PVB) on pain management in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Acute and chronic pain over time, perioperative oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption and patient satisfaction were measured. A protracted enrollment period and participant attrition precluded target enrollment and subsequent power analysis. Further, there was no increased efficacy of the intervention groups over the control group. In fact, the patient-controlled analgesia only group (control) had lower mean and median MME consumption postoperatively. Pain and patient satisfaction scores were similar among all treatment groups at all time points assessed. We characterize our study population, report our results for each treatment group and highlight challenges encountered and lessons learned to aid in the development of future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
General Anaesthesia with Muscle Paralysis in Patients with Anterior Mediastinal Mass – an audit of 15 cases and review of literature Combined spinal epidural for Total Knee Replacement in patients with low Ejection Fraction: A Case Series Impact of continuous paravertebral blockade infusion type on pain management over time for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1