精神分裂症患者冷漠评估量表自评版(AES-S)的欧洲西班牙改编的验证

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rpsm.2020.04.008
Clara Martínez-Cao , Leticia García-Álvarez , Teresa Bobes-Bascarán , Lorena de la Fuente-Tomás , Emilio Fernández-Egea , Ángela Velasco , Leticia González-Blanco , Paula Zurrón-Madera , Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero , Pilar A. Sáiz-Martínez , María Paz García-Portilla , Julio Bobes
{"title":"精神分裂症患者冷漠评估量表自评版(AES-S)的欧洲西班牙改编的验证","authors":"Clara Martínez-Cao ,&nbsp;Leticia García-Álvarez ,&nbsp;Teresa Bobes-Bascarán ,&nbsp;Lorena de la Fuente-Tomás ,&nbsp;Emilio Fernández-Egea ,&nbsp;Ángela Velasco ,&nbsp;Leticia González-Blanco ,&nbsp;Paula Zurrón-Madera ,&nbsp;Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero ,&nbsp;Pilar A. Sáiz-Martínez ,&nbsp;María Paz García-Portilla ,&nbsp;Julio Bobes","doi":"10.1016/j.rpsm.2020.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Apathy is a negative symptom of schizophrenia and is associated with poor real world functioning. Therefore, it is important to have validated psychometric instruments to assess this symptom. This is the first study to validate the Spanish adaptation of the self-rated version of the Apathy Assessment Scale (AES-S) in patients with schizophrenia.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Naturalistic, cross-sectional, validation study in 104 patients with schizophrenia evaluated using the following scales: Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS), Self-report of Negative Symptoms (SNS), Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), and Apathy Evaluation Scale-self-rated version (AES-S).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Reliability: Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.908. Convergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between AES-S and CAINS-MAP total scores was −0.483 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). For SNS, total and avolition subscale scores were −0.803 and −0.639 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), respectively. With the MAP-SR, the correlation coefficient was −0.727 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). Divergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between AES-S and PSP total scores was 0.504 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). Furthermore, with the CDSS, the correlation coefficient was −0.431 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). Discriminant validity: The AES-S discriminated between different levels of illness severity according to CGI-S scores. Factor analysis: A three-component solution explained 57.32% of the variance. Pearson correlations between coefficients were 1–2<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.265, 1–3<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.464, and 2–3<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.060.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Spanish AES-S is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing apathy in Spanish patients with schizophrenia. It seems to be appropriate for use in everyday clinical practice as a means of monitoring apathy in these patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21391,"journal":{"name":"Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888989120300331/pdfft?md5=3d48a2cba476908b299b235cf261095d&pid=1-s2.0-S1888989120300331-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a European Spanish adaptation of the Apathy Evaluation Scale-self-rated version (AES-S) in patients with schizophrenia\",\"authors\":\"Clara Martínez-Cao ,&nbsp;Leticia García-Álvarez ,&nbsp;Teresa Bobes-Bascarán ,&nbsp;Lorena de la Fuente-Tomás ,&nbsp;Emilio Fernández-Egea ,&nbsp;Ángela Velasco ,&nbsp;Leticia González-Blanco ,&nbsp;Paula Zurrón-Madera ,&nbsp;Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero ,&nbsp;Pilar A. Sáiz-Martínez ,&nbsp;María Paz García-Portilla ,&nbsp;Julio Bobes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rpsm.2020.04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Apathy is a negative symptom of schizophrenia and is associated with poor real world functioning. Therefore, it is important to have validated psychometric instruments to assess this symptom. This is the first study to validate the Spanish adaptation of the self-rated version of the Apathy Assessment Scale (AES-S) in patients with schizophrenia.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Naturalistic, cross-sectional, validation study in 104 patients with schizophrenia evaluated using the following scales: Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS), Self-report of Negative Symptoms (SNS), Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), and Apathy Evaluation Scale-self-rated version (AES-S).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Reliability: Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.908. Convergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between AES-S and CAINS-MAP total scores was −0.483 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). For SNS, total and avolition subscale scores were −0.803 and −0.639 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), respectively. With the MAP-SR, the correlation coefficient was −0.727 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). Divergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between AES-S and PSP total scores was 0.504 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). Furthermore, with the CDSS, the correlation coefficient was −0.431 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). Discriminant validity: The AES-S discriminated between different levels of illness severity according to CGI-S scores. Factor analysis: A three-component solution explained 57.32% of the variance. Pearson correlations between coefficients were 1–2<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.265, 1–3<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.464, and 2–3<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.060.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Spanish AES-S is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing apathy in Spanish patients with schizophrenia. It seems to be appropriate for use in everyday clinical practice as a means of monitoring apathy in these patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888989120300331/pdfft?md5=3d48a2cba476908b299b235cf261095d&pid=1-s2.0-S1888989120300331-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888989120300331\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888989120300331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

冷漠是精神分裂症的一种阴性症状,与现实生活功能低下有关。因此,重要的是要有有效的心理测量工具来评估这种症状。这是第一个验证西班牙语自评版冷漠评估量表(AES-S)在精神分裂症患者中的适应性的研究。材料与方法对104例精神分裂症患者进行自然、横断面、验证性研究,采用以下量表进行评估:临床总体印象-严重程度(ci -s)、个人与社会表现(PSP)、阴性症状临床评估访谈(CAINS)、阴性症状自述(SNS)、动机与愉悦量表-自述(MAP-SR)、精神分裂症卡尔加里抑郁量表(CDSS)和冷漠评估量表-自评版(AES-S)。结果信度:内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha)为0.908。收敛效度:AES-S总分与CAINS-MAP总分的Pearson相关系数为- 0.483 (p <0.001)。SNS的总分和自愿分分别为- 0.803分和- 0.639分(p <分别为0.001)。MAP-SR的相关系数为- 0.727 (p <0.001)。发散效度:AES-S与PSP总分的Pearson相关系数为0.504 (p <0.001)。此外,与CDSS相关系数为- 0.431 (p <0.001)。区分效度:AES-S根据CGI-S评分区分不同程度的疾病严重程度。因子分析:三组分解决方案解释了57.32%的方差。系数间Pearson相关性为1-2 = 0.265,1-3 = 0.464,2-3 = 0.060。结论西班牙AES-S量表是一种可靠、有效的评估西班牙精神分裂症患者冷漠程度的工具。它似乎适合在日常临床实践中使用,作为监测这些患者冷漠的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a European Spanish adaptation of the Apathy Evaluation Scale-self-rated version (AES-S) in patients with schizophrenia

Introduction

Apathy is a negative symptom of schizophrenia and is associated with poor real world functioning. Therefore, it is important to have validated psychometric instruments to assess this symptom. This is the first study to validate the Spanish adaptation of the self-rated version of the Apathy Assessment Scale (AES-S) in patients with schizophrenia.

Materials and methods

Naturalistic, cross-sectional, validation study in 104 patients with schizophrenia evaluated using the following scales: Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS), Self-report of Negative Symptoms (SNS), Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), and Apathy Evaluation Scale-self-rated version (AES-S).

Results

Reliability: Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.908. Convergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between AES-S and CAINS-MAP total scores was −0.483 (p < 0.001). For SNS, total and avolition subscale scores were −0.803 and −0.639 (p < 0.001), respectively. With the MAP-SR, the correlation coefficient was −0.727 (p < 0.001). Divergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between AES-S and PSP total scores was 0.504 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, with the CDSS, the correlation coefficient was −0.431 (p < 0.001). Discriminant validity: The AES-S discriminated between different levels of illness severity according to CGI-S scores. Factor analysis: A three-component solution explained 57.32% of the variance. Pearson correlations between coefficients were 1–2 = 0.265, 1–3 = 0.464, and 2–3 = 0.060.

Conclusion

The Spanish AES-S is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing apathy in Spanish patients with schizophrenia. It seems to be appropriate for use in everyday clinical practice as a means of monitoring apathy in these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health (SJPMH), incorporated into ISSN 1888-9891, is the official scientific publication of the Spanish Society of Psychiatry and Mental Health. The journal focuses on studying mental illnesses, their pathological processes, and their psychosocial consequences, and aims to disseminate scientific advances in all areas related to mental health and illness. SJPMH accepts unpublished works on psychiatry and mental health, including their medical and social implications. The journal provides space for research in the biological, clinical, and psychosocial fields. Manuscripts undergo peer-review by external reviewers before being accepted for publication. SJPMH is indexed in Index Medicus/Medline, IBECS, Social Sciences Citation Index Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition, and Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences.
期刊最新文献
Schizophrenia and the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review from the biomedical perspective. Volume alterations of the hippocampus and amygdala in patients with schizophrenia and persistent auditory hallucinations. Deep brain stimulation and digital monitoring for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A case series. Koro-like syndrome in Huntington's disease. Meta-analysis of the effects of adjuvant drugs in co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1