椎间孔韧带系缚颈上神经根:术后C5神经麻痹的潜在原因。

IF 1.1 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury Pub Date : 2020-07-24 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1712982
Andrew S Jack, Brooks R Osburn, Zane A Tymchak, Wyatt L Ramey, Rod J Oskouian, Robert A Hart, Jens R Chapman, Line G Jacques, R Shane Tubbs
{"title":"椎间孔韧带系缚颈上神经根:术后C5神经麻痹的潜在原因。","authors":"Andrew S Jack,&nbsp;Brooks R Osburn,&nbsp;Zane A Tymchak,&nbsp;Wyatt L Ramey,&nbsp;Rod J Oskouian,&nbsp;Robert A Hart,&nbsp;Jens R Chapman,&nbsp;Line G Jacques,&nbsp;R Shane Tubbs","doi":"10.1055/s-0040-1712982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Nerve root tethering upon dorsal spinal cord (SC) migration has been proposed as a potential mechanism for postoperative C5 palsy (C5P). To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate this relationship by anatomically comparing C5-C6 nerve root translation before and after root untethering by cutting the cervical foraminal ligaments (FL). <b>Objective</b>  The aim of this study is to determine if C5 root untethering through FL cutting results in increased root translation. <b>Methods</b>  Six cadaveric dissections were performed. Nerve roots were exposed via C4-C6 corpectomies and supraclavicular brachial plexus exposure. Pins were inserted into the C5-C6 roots and adjacent foraminal tubercle. Translation was measured as the distance between pins after the SC was dorsally displaced 5 mm before and after FL cutting. Clinical feasibility of FL release was examined by comparing root translation between standard and extended (complete foraminal decompression) foraminotomies. Translation of root levels before and after FL cutting was compared by two-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. <b>Results</b>  Significantly more nerve root translation was observed if the FL was cut versus not-cut, <i>p</i>  = 0.001; no difference was seen between levels, <i>p</i>  = 0.33. Performing an extended cervical foraminotomy was technically feasible allowing complete FL release and root untethering, whereas a standard foraminotomy did not. <b>Conclusion</b>  FL tether upper cervical nerve roots in their foramina; cutting these ligaments untethers the root and increases translation suggesting they could be harmful in the context of C5P. Further investigation is required examining the value of root untethering in the context of C5P.</p>","PeriodicalId":15280,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0040-1712982","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foraminal Ligaments Tether Upper Cervical Nerve Roots: A Potential Cause of Postoperative C5 Palsy.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew S Jack,&nbsp;Brooks R Osburn,&nbsp;Zane A Tymchak,&nbsp;Wyatt L Ramey,&nbsp;Rod J Oskouian,&nbsp;Robert A Hart,&nbsp;Jens R Chapman,&nbsp;Line G Jacques,&nbsp;R Shane Tubbs\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0040-1712982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Nerve root tethering upon dorsal spinal cord (SC) migration has been proposed as a potential mechanism for postoperative C5 palsy (C5P). To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate this relationship by anatomically comparing C5-C6 nerve root translation before and after root untethering by cutting the cervical foraminal ligaments (FL). <b>Objective</b>  The aim of this study is to determine if C5 root untethering through FL cutting results in increased root translation. <b>Methods</b>  Six cadaveric dissections were performed. Nerve roots were exposed via C4-C6 corpectomies and supraclavicular brachial plexus exposure. Pins were inserted into the C5-C6 roots and adjacent foraminal tubercle. Translation was measured as the distance between pins after the SC was dorsally displaced 5 mm before and after FL cutting. Clinical feasibility of FL release was examined by comparing root translation between standard and extended (complete foraminal decompression) foraminotomies. Translation of root levels before and after FL cutting was compared by two-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. <b>Results</b>  Significantly more nerve root translation was observed if the FL was cut versus not-cut, <i>p</i>  = 0.001; no difference was seen between levels, <i>p</i>  = 0.33. Performing an extended cervical foraminotomy was technically feasible allowing complete FL release and root untethering, whereas a standard foraminotomy did not. <b>Conclusion</b>  FL tether upper cervical nerve roots in their foramina; cutting these ligaments untethers the root and increases translation suggesting they could be harmful in the context of C5P. Further investigation is required examining the value of root untethering in the context of C5P.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0040-1712982\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1712982\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1712982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

脊髓背侧(SC)迁移时的神经根栓系被认为是术后C5麻痹(C5P)的潜在机制。据我们所知,这是第一个通过解剖比较切断颈椎间孔韧带(FL)解扎前后C5-C6神经根平移来研究这种关系的研究。目的本研究的目的是确定通过FL切割C5根解栓是否会增加根的平移。方法对6具尸体进行解剖。神经根通过C4-C6椎体切除和锁骨上臂丛显露。将针插入C5-C6根和邻近的椎间孔结节。平移量测量为SC在FL切割前后背移5mm后销间的距离。通过比较标准和扩展(完全椎间孔减压)椎间孔切开术的根平移来检查FL释放的临床可行性。采用双向重复测量方差分析,比较扦插前后根系水平的变化。统计学意义为0.05。结果切下前滤膜后神经根平移率明显高于未切下前滤膜,p = 0.001;水平间无差异,p = 0.33。进行扩展颈椎椎间孔切开术在技术上是可行的,可以完全释放FL并解除根系,而标准椎间孔切开术则不行。结论FL系扎颈上神经根;切断这些韧带会解开根的束缚,增加翻译,这表明它们在C5P的情况下可能是有害的。在C5P的背景下,需要进一步的调查来检查根解栓的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Foraminal Ligaments Tether Upper Cervical Nerve Roots: A Potential Cause of Postoperative C5 Palsy.

Background  Nerve root tethering upon dorsal spinal cord (SC) migration has been proposed as a potential mechanism for postoperative C5 palsy (C5P). To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate this relationship by anatomically comparing C5-C6 nerve root translation before and after root untethering by cutting the cervical foraminal ligaments (FL). Objective  The aim of this study is to determine if C5 root untethering through FL cutting results in increased root translation. Methods  Six cadaveric dissections were performed. Nerve roots were exposed via C4-C6 corpectomies and supraclavicular brachial plexus exposure. Pins were inserted into the C5-C6 roots and adjacent foraminal tubercle. Translation was measured as the distance between pins after the SC was dorsally displaced 5 mm before and after FL cutting. Clinical feasibility of FL release was examined by comparing root translation between standard and extended (complete foraminal decompression) foraminotomies. Translation of root levels before and after FL cutting was compared by two-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. Results  Significantly more nerve root translation was observed if the FL was cut versus not-cut, p  = 0.001; no difference was seen between levels, p  = 0.33. Performing an extended cervical foraminotomy was technically feasible allowing complete FL release and root untethering, whereas a standard foraminotomy did not. Conclusion  FL tether upper cervical nerve roots in their foramina; cutting these ligaments untethers the root and increases translation suggesting they could be harmful in the context of C5P. Further investigation is required examining the value of root untethering in the context of C5P.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JBPPNI is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that will encompass all aspects of basic and clinical research findings, in the area of brachial plexus and peripheral nerve injury. Injury in this context refers to congenital, inflammatory, traumatic, degenerative and neoplastic processes, including neurofibromatosis. Papers on diagnostic and imaging aspects of the peripheral nervous system are welcomed as well. The peripheral nervous system is unique in its complexity and scope of influence. There are areas of interest in the anatomy, physiology, metabolism, phylogeny, and limb growth tropism of peripheral nerves.
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Hand and Shoulder Function in Children following Early Surgical Intervention for a Birth-Related Upper Brachial Plexus Injury. Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic in Patients with a Previous Phrenic Nerve Transfer for a Traumatic Brachial Plexus Palsy. Long-Term Results of Isolated Latissimus Dorsi to Rotator Cuff Transfer in Brachial Plexus Birth Injury. Intercostal Nerve Transfers to Native Triceps or Free Muscle Flaps for Elbow Extension in Brachial Plexus Injuries Nerve Tracing in Juvenile Rats: A Feasible Model for the Study of Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy and Cocontractions?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1