气味介导的蚁群组织与协调(Mayr)。

IF 2.8 4区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Chemical Senses Pub Date : 2020-11-07 DOI:10.1093/chemse/bjaa058
Abdullahi A Yusuf, Erik T Frank, Ayuka T Fombong, Christian W W Pirk, Robin M Crewe, Thomas Schmitt, Martin Strube-Bloss, Ian Gordon, Baldwyn Torto
{"title":"气味介导的蚁群组织与协调(Mayr)。","authors":"Abdullahi A Yusuf,&nbsp;Erik T Frank,&nbsp;Ayuka T Fombong,&nbsp;Christian W W Pirk,&nbsp;Robin M Crewe,&nbsp;Thomas Schmitt,&nbsp;Martin Strube-Bloss,&nbsp;Ian Gordon,&nbsp;Baldwyn Torto","doi":"10.1093/chemse/bjaa058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual and olfactory communications are vital for coordinated group hunting in most animals. To hunt for prey, the group-raiding termite specialist ant Megaponera analis, which lacks good vision, must first confirm the presence or absence of conspecific raiders. Here, we show that M. analis uses olfactory cues for intraspecific communication and showed greater preference for conspecific odors over clean air (blank) or odors from its termite prey. Chemical analysis of ant volatiles identified predominantly short-chained hydrocarbons. Electrophysiological analysis revealed differential sensory detection of the odor compounds, which were confirmed in behavioral olfactometric choice assays with odor bouquets collected from major and minor castes and the 2 most dominant volatiles and n-undecane n-tridecane. A comparative analysis of the cuticular hydrocarbon profile with those of the short-chained odor bouquet of different populations shows a high divergence in the long-chained profile and a much-conserved short-chained odor bouquet. This suggests that there is less selection pressure for divergence and individual recognition in the short- than the long-chained odor profiles. We conclude that olfactory communication serves as an alternative to visual or sound communication, especially during group raids in M. analis when ants are not in direct contact with one another.</p>","PeriodicalId":9771,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Senses","volume":"45 8","pages":"635-644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/chemse/bjaa058","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Odor-Mediated Group Organization and Coordination in the Termite-Raiding Ant Megaponera analis (Mayr).\",\"authors\":\"Abdullahi A Yusuf,&nbsp;Erik T Frank,&nbsp;Ayuka T Fombong,&nbsp;Christian W W Pirk,&nbsp;Robin M Crewe,&nbsp;Thomas Schmitt,&nbsp;Martin Strube-Bloss,&nbsp;Ian Gordon,&nbsp;Baldwyn Torto\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/chemse/bjaa058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Visual and olfactory communications are vital for coordinated group hunting in most animals. To hunt for prey, the group-raiding termite specialist ant Megaponera analis, which lacks good vision, must first confirm the presence or absence of conspecific raiders. Here, we show that M. analis uses olfactory cues for intraspecific communication and showed greater preference for conspecific odors over clean air (blank) or odors from its termite prey. Chemical analysis of ant volatiles identified predominantly short-chained hydrocarbons. Electrophysiological analysis revealed differential sensory detection of the odor compounds, which were confirmed in behavioral olfactometric choice assays with odor bouquets collected from major and minor castes and the 2 most dominant volatiles and n-undecane n-tridecane. A comparative analysis of the cuticular hydrocarbon profile with those of the short-chained odor bouquet of different populations shows a high divergence in the long-chained profile and a much-conserved short-chained odor bouquet. This suggests that there is less selection pressure for divergence and individual recognition in the short- than the long-chained odor profiles. We conclude that olfactory communication serves as an alternative to visual or sound communication, especially during group raids in M. analis when ants are not in direct contact with one another.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Senses\",\"volume\":\"45 8\",\"pages\":\"635-644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/chemse/bjaa058\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Senses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjaa058\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Senses","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjaa058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于大多数动物来说,视觉和嗅觉交流对于协调集体狩猎至关重要。为了寻找猎物,群袭白蚁专家、缺乏良好视力的巨角蚁分析蚁必须首先确认是否存在同种入侵者。在这里,我们发现M. analis使用嗅觉线索进行种内交流,并表现出对同种气味的更大偏好,而不是清洁空气(空白)或白蚁猎物的气味。化学分析发现蚂蚁挥发物主要是短链烃。电生理分析揭示了气味化合物的不同感官检测,这在行为嗅觉选择实验中得到了证实,该实验采用了主要种姓和次要种姓收集的气味花束,以及2种最主要的挥发物和正十一烷和正十三烷。对不同种群的短链气味谱和长链气味谱进行了比较分析,结果表明,长链气味谱的差异较大,短链气味谱的差异较大。这表明,短链气味的分化和个体识别的选择压力要小于长链气味。我们得出的结论是,嗅觉交流是视觉或声音交流的一种替代方式,特别是在蚁群袭击中,当蚂蚁彼此之间没有直接接触时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Odor-Mediated Group Organization and Coordination in the Termite-Raiding Ant Megaponera analis (Mayr).

Visual and olfactory communications are vital for coordinated group hunting in most animals. To hunt for prey, the group-raiding termite specialist ant Megaponera analis, which lacks good vision, must first confirm the presence or absence of conspecific raiders. Here, we show that M. analis uses olfactory cues for intraspecific communication and showed greater preference for conspecific odors over clean air (blank) or odors from its termite prey. Chemical analysis of ant volatiles identified predominantly short-chained hydrocarbons. Electrophysiological analysis revealed differential sensory detection of the odor compounds, which were confirmed in behavioral olfactometric choice assays with odor bouquets collected from major and minor castes and the 2 most dominant volatiles and n-undecane n-tridecane. A comparative analysis of the cuticular hydrocarbon profile with those of the short-chained odor bouquet of different populations shows a high divergence in the long-chained profile and a much-conserved short-chained odor bouquet. This suggests that there is less selection pressure for divergence and individual recognition in the short- than the long-chained odor profiles. We conclude that olfactory communication serves as an alternative to visual or sound communication, especially during group raids in M. analis when ants are not in direct contact with one another.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Senses
Chemical Senses 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
25
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Senses publishes original research and review papers on all aspects of chemoreception in both humans and animals. An important part of the journal''s coverage is devoted to techniques and the development and application of new methods for investigating chemoreception and chemosensory structures.
期刊最新文献
A receptor-based assay to study the sweet and bitter tastes of sweeteners and binary sweet blends: The SWEET Project. Late olfactory bulb involvement in COVID19. Monorhinal and Birhinal Odor Processing in Humans: an fMRI investigation. Methodologies for smellwalks and scentwalks-a critical review. Emotional self-body odors do not influence the access to visual awareness by emotional faces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1