通过体外受精受孕的女性及其男性伴侣与未通过体外受精受孕的男性伴侣在婚姻角色质量上是否存在差异?

Morine Cebert, Susan Silva, Eleanor L Stevenson
{"title":"通过体外受精受孕的女性及其男性伴侣与未通过体外受精受孕的男性伴侣在婚姻角色质量上是否存在差异?","authors":"Morine Cebert,&nbsp;Susan Silva,&nbsp;Eleanor L Stevenson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Marital-role quality (MRQ) is a predictor of mental well-being, sexual intimacy, and maternal attachment. Data on differences in MRQ during pregnancy between women and their male partners who conceived spontaneously or via IVF are inconclusive. This study compared MRQ across pregnancy in these two groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample's two groups: (a) 26 women and 26 male partners who conceived via IVF; and (b) 25 women and 20 male partners who conceived spontaneously. All 97 participants completed a MRQ scale during each trimester of pregnancy. Trajectory analyses were conducted to test for between-group differences in the changes in subscales across pregnancy within dyads.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scores did not reveal any significant differences in subscales in those who conceived via IVF compared to non-IVF groups across the three trimesters in each dyad. The observed effect sizes were small, with exception that males in the non-IVF comparison group had greater concerns during the first trimester than did males in the IVF group (Cohen d= 0.51, moderate effect size).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though the IVF population perceives pregnancy differently and experiences more anxiety than those who conceive spontaneously, their marital-role quality during pregnancy does not seem to be affected. Their perceptions before conception and in early parenting are worthy of investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73614,"journal":{"name":"Journal of best practices in health professions diversity : research, education and policy","volume":"11 2","pages":"135-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462718/pdf/nihms-1570689.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are There Differences in Marital-Role Quality between Women and Their Male Partners Who Conceived Via IVF and Those Who Did Not?\",\"authors\":\"Morine Cebert,&nbsp;Susan Silva,&nbsp;Eleanor L Stevenson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Marital-role quality (MRQ) is a predictor of mental well-being, sexual intimacy, and maternal attachment. Data on differences in MRQ during pregnancy between women and their male partners who conceived spontaneously or via IVF are inconclusive. This study compared MRQ across pregnancy in these two groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample's two groups: (a) 26 women and 26 male partners who conceived via IVF; and (b) 25 women and 20 male partners who conceived spontaneously. All 97 participants completed a MRQ scale during each trimester of pregnancy. Trajectory analyses were conducted to test for between-group differences in the changes in subscales across pregnancy within dyads.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scores did not reveal any significant differences in subscales in those who conceived via IVF compared to non-IVF groups across the three trimesters in each dyad. The observed effect sizes were small, with exception that males in the non-IVF comparison group had greater concerns during the first trimester than did males in the IVF group (Cohen d= 0.51, moderate effect size).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though the IVF population perceives pregnancy differently and experiences more anxiety than those who conceive spontaneously, their marital-role quality during pregnancy does not seem to be affected. Their perceptions before conception and in early parenting are worthy of investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of best practices in health professions diversity : research, education and policy\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"135-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462718/pdf/nihms-1570689.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of best practices in health professions diversity : research, education and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of best practices in health professions diversity : research, education and policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:婚姻角色质量(MRQ)是心理健康、性亲密和母亲依恋的预测因子。关于女性和她们的男性伴侣在怀孕期间MRQ差异的数据,无论是自然受孕还是通过体外受精受孕,都是不确定的。这项研究比较了这两组怀孕期间的MRQ。方法:样本分为两组:(a)通过体外受精受孕的女性和男性各26名;(b) 25名女性和20名男性伴侣自发受孕。所有97名参与者在怀孕的每个三个月都完成了MRQ量表。进行轨迹分析,以测试组间差异的亚量表的变化在怀孕期间的双。结果:在每个双胎的三个月里,通过试管受精受孕的人与非试管受精组相比,得分没有显示出任何显著的差异。观察到的效应量很小,除了非IVF对照组的男性在妊娠前三个月比IVF组的男性有更大的担忧(Cohen d= 0.51,中等效应量)。结论:虽然体外受精人群对怀孕的感知不同,比自然受孕的人经历更多的焦虑,但他们在怀孕期间的婚姻角色质量似乎没有受到影响。她们在怀孕前和养育子女早期的观念值得调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are There Differences in Marital-Role Quality between Women and Their Male Partners Who Conceived Via IVF and Those Who Did Not?

Objectives: Marital-role quality (MRQ) is a predictor of mental well-being, sexual intimacy, and maternal attachment. Data on differences in MRQ during pregnancy between women and their male partners who conceived spontaneously or via IVF are inconclusive. This study compared MRQ across pregnancy in these two groups.

Methods: The sample's two groups: (a) 26 women and 26 male partners who conceived via IVF; and (b) 25 women and 20 male partners who conceived spontaneously. All 97 participants completed a MRQ scale during each trimester of pregnancy. Trajectory analyses were conducted to test for between-group differences in the changes in subscales across pregnancy within dyads.

Results: Scores did not reveal any significant differences in subscales in those who conceived via IVF compared to non-IVF groups across the three trimesters in each dyad. The observed effect sizes were small, with exception that males in the non-IVF comparison group had greater concerns during the first trimester than did males in the IVF group (Cohen d= 0.51, moderate effect size).

Conclusions: Though the IVF population perceives pregnancy differently and experiences more anxiety than those who conceive spontaneously, their marital-role quality during pregnancy does not seem to be affected. Their perceptions before conception and in early parenting are worthy of investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Development and Pilot Testing of an Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Disease Risk-Prevention Program to Promote Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Among African-American College Students - Rams Have HEART. Are Demographic Factors Associated with Diabetes Risk Perception and Preventive Behavior? Challenging a Fundamental Proposition of Patient-Centeredness. An Urban School District-University-Industry Partnership to Increase Diversity in the Health Professions: Lesson Learned from the University of Kansas Health Science Academy. Are There Differences in Marital-Role Quality between Women and Their Male Partners Who Conceived Via IVF and Those Who Did Not?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1