2017年各州政策环境下诊所堕胎服务提供情况

Q2 Medicine Contraception: X Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.conx.2020.100043
Elizabeth Witwer, Rachel K. Jones, Liza Fuentes, S. Kate Castle
{"title":"2017年各州政策环境下诊所堕胎服务提供情况","authors":"Elizabeth Witwer,&nbsp;Rachel K. Jones,&nbsp;Liza Fuentes,&nbsp;S. Kate Castle","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective was to examine service delivery in clinics that provided abortions in 2017, including differences by abortion policy climate.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Using data from the Guttmacher Institute's 2017 Abortion Provider Census, we examine amount charged for abortion care, pregnancy gestation at which abortions were offered, number of days per week that clinics provided abortions and types of nonabortion services offered. Our analysis focuses on the 808 clinic facilities that provided 95% of abortions that year. Measures were calculated nationally and according to whether the clinic was in a state we categorized as hostile, middle ground or supportive of abortion rights.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 2017, 64% of clinics offered abortion at 11 weeks pregnancy gestation, and 22% did so at 20 weeks gestation. Supportive states had a higher density of clinics that provide abortion for every measured gestation than hostile states. Clinics charged an average of $549 for a surgical abortion at 10 weeks and $551 for medication abortion. Some 46% of clinics in supportive states offered abortion care 5 or more days per week compared to 29% in hostile states. Most clinics offered standalone contraception and family planning (87%) and gynecological care (85%), but the proportion of clinics that provided these services was higher in supportive states (93% and 90%) than in hostile states (75% and 73%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A substantial proportion of abortion facilities provide a range of other health care services. Aspects of service delivery, such as number of days abortions are provided, may vary according to abortion policy climate.</p></div><div><h3>Implications statement</h3><p>Onerous policies in states hostile to abortion rights may inhibit some facilities from providing abortion more days per week, and if so, could further burden patients obtaining abortion care in these states.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100043","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abortion service delivery in clinics by state policy climate in 2017\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Witwer,&nbsp;Rachel K. Jones,&nbsp;Liza Fuentes,&nbsp;S. Kate Castle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective was to examine service delivery in clinics that provided abortions in 2017, including differences by abortion policy climate.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Using data from the Guttmacher Institute's 2017 Abortion Provider Census, we examine amount charged for abortion care, pregnancy gestation at which abortions were offered, number of days per week that clinics provided abortions and types of nonabortion services offered. Our analysis focuses on the 808 clinic facilities that provided 95% of abortions that year. Measures were calculated nationally and according to whether the clinic was in a state we categorized as hostile, middle ground or supportive of abortion rights.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 2017, 64% of clinics offered abortion at 11 weeks pregnancy gestation, and 22% did so at 20 weeks gestation. Supportive states had a higher density of clinics that provide abortion for every measured gestation than hostile states. Clinics charged an average of $549 for a surgical abortion at 10 weeks and $551 for medication abortion. Some 46% of clinics in supportive states offered abortion care 5 or more days per week compared to 29% in hostile states. Most clinics offered standalone contraception and family planning (87%) and gynecological care (85%), but the proportion of clinics that provided these services was higher in supportive states (93% and 90%) than in hostile states (75% and 73%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A substantial proportion of abortion facilities provide a range of other health care services. Aspects of service delivery, such as number of days abortions are provided, may vary according to abortion policy climate.</p></div><div><h3>Implications statement</h3><p>Onerous policies in states hostile to abortion rights may inhibit some facilities from providing abortion more days per week, and if so, could further burden patients obtaining abortion care in these states.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception: X\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100043\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100043\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

目的考察2017年提供堕胎服务的诊所的服务提供情况,包括堕胎政策环境的差异。研究设计使用古特马赫研究所2017年堕胎提供者普查的数据,我们检查了堕胎护理的收费金额、提供堕胎的妊娠期、诊所每周提供堕胎的天数以及提供的非堕胎服务的类型。我们的分析集中在808家诊所,这些诊所当年提供了95%的堕胎服务。衡量标准是在全国范围内计算的,根据诊所所在的州,我们将其归类为敌对、中间立场或支持堕胎权的州。结果2017年,64%的诊所在妊娠11 周提供堕胎服务,22%的诊所在妊娠20 周提供堕胎服务。支持堕胎的州比反对堕胎的州有更高密度的诊所为每一次怀孕提供堕胎服务。诊所对10周 手术流产的平均收费为549美元,对药物流产的平均收费为551美元。在支持堕胎的州,46%的诊所每周提供5天或更多的堕胎护理,而在反对堕胎的州,这一比例为29%。大多数诊所提供独立的避孕和计划生育(87%)和妇科护理(85%),但提供这些服务的诊所比例在支持州(93%和90%)高于敌对州(75%和73%)。结论相当比例的堕胎机构提供一系列其他保健服务。提供服务的各个方面,如提供堕胎的天数,可能因堕胎政策环境而异。含义陈述:在反对堕胎权利的州,繁重的政策可能会阻止一些机构每周提供更多的堕胎天数,如果是这样,可能会进一步加重这些州获得堕胎护理的患者的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abortion service delivery in clinics by state policy climate in 2017

Objective

The objective was to examine service delivery in clinics that provided abortions in 2017, including differences by abortion policy climate.

Study design

Using data from the Guttmacher Institute's 2017 Abortion Provider Census, we examine amount charged for abortion care, pregnancy gestation at which abortions were offered, number of days per week that clinics provided abortions and types of nonabortion services offered. Our analysis focuses on the 808 clinic facilities that provided 95% of abortions that year. Measures were calculated nationally and according to whether the clinic was in a state we categorized as hostile, middle ground or supportive of abortion rights.

Results

In 2017, 64% of clinics offered abortion at 11 weeks pregnancy gestation, and 22% did so at 20 weeks gestation. Supportive states had a higher density of clinics that provide abortion for every measured gestation than hostile states. Clinics charged an average of $549 for a surgical abortion at 10 weeks and $551 for medication abortion. Some 46% of clinics in supportive states offered abortion care 5 or more days per week compared to 29% in hostile states. Most clinics offered standalone contraception and family planning (87%) and gynecological care (85%), but the proportion of clinics that provided these services was higher in supportive states (93% and 90%) than in hostile states (75% and 73%).

Conclusions

A substantial proportion of abortion facilities provide a range of other health care services. Aspects of service delivery, such as number of days abortions are provided, may vary according to abortion policy climate.

Implications statement

Onerous policies in states hostile to abortion rights may inhibit some facilities from providing abortion more days per week, and if so, could further burden patients obtaining abortion care in these states.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Outpatient medical management of later second trimester abortion (18–23.6 weeks) with procedural evacuation backup: A large case series Experiences of delay-causing obstacles and mental health at the time of abortion seeking Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use How does person-centered maternity care relate to postpartum contraceptive counseling and use? Evidence from a longitudinal study of women delivering at health facilities in Ethiopia Dilation and evacuation versus medication abortion at 15–24 weeks of gestation in low-middle income country: A retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1