在美国成年人的全国代表性样本中,公众对电子烟相关政策的支持。

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Tobacco Use Insights Pub Date : 2020-10-09 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179173X20959700
Lauren Czaplicki, Randall Simpson, Yitong Zhou, Minal Patel, Alison F Cuccia, Donna M Vallone, Barbara A Schillo
{"title":"在美国成年人的全国代表性样本中,公众对电子烟相关政策的支持。","authors":"Lauren Czaplicki,&nbsp;Randall Simpson,&nbsp;Yitong Zhou,&nbsp;Minal Patel,&nbsp;Alison F Cuccia,&nbsp;Donna M Vallone,&nbsp;Barbara A Schillo","doi":"10.1177/1179173X20959700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The wide availability of flavored e-cigarettes and broad use of e-cigarettes in public places may contribute to the rapidly increasing rates of use among youth and young adults in the U.S. However, policies at the federal, state and local levels can address these factors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess public support for 5 e-cigarette-related policies and evaluate response patterns by demographics, tobacco use, e-cigarette harm perceptions, geographic region, and strength of state-level clean indoor air policies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected Oct-Dec 2018 from a nationally representative online panel of U.S. adults (n = 3211). We measured support for 5 policies: (1) a ban on the sale flavored e-cigarettes; (2) requiring tobacco products, like e-cigarettes, be kept out of view in stores where adolescents shop; and prohibiting e-cigarette use in (3) all public places; (4) restaurants; and (5) bars. Weighted, adjusted logistic regressions modeled variation in policy support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A majority of respondents (63.3%) supported a flavor ban, with no differences in support by smoking status. Most respondents supported keeping tobacco products out of view (78.0%) and prohibiting e-cigarette use in indoor public places (82.9%), restaurants (86.5%), and bars (76.1%). In the adjusted models, current e-cigarette users had significantly lower odds of policy support compared to never users. We observed no differences in support by geographic region or strength of state-level clean indoor air policies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest high levels of public support to regulate e-cigarette flavors, marketing, and use in public places. Targeted messaging may be needed to increase support among current e-cigarette users.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"13 ","pages":"1179173X20959700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179173X20959700","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Support for E-Cigarette-related Policies among a Nationally Representative Sample of US Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Czaplicki,&nbsp;Randall Simpson,&nbsp;Yitong Zhou,&nbsp;Minal Patel,&nbsp;Alison F Cuccia,&nbsp;Donna M Vallone,&nbsp;Barbara A Schillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179173X20959700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The wide availability of flavored e-cigarettes and broad use of e-cigarettes in public places may contribute to the rapidly increasing rates of use among youth and young adults in the U.S. However, policies at the federal, state and local levels can address these factors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess public support for 5 e-cigarette-related policies and evaluate response patterns by demographics, tobacco use, e-cigarette harm perceptions, geographic region, and strength of state-level clean indoor air policies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected Oct-Dec 2018 from a nationally representative online panel of U.S. adults (n = 3211). We measured support for 5 policies: (1) a ban on the sale flavored e-cigarettes; (2) requiring tobacco products, like e-cigarettes, be kept out of view in stores where adolescents shop; and prohibiting e-cigarette use in (3) all public places; (4) restaurants; and (5) bars. Weighted, adjusted logistic regressions modeled variation in policy support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A majority of respondents (63.3%) supported a flavor ban, with no differences in support by smoking status. Most respondents supported keeping tobacco products out of view (78.0%) and prohibiting e-cigarette use in indoor public places (82.9%), restaurants (86.5%), and bars (76.1%). In the adjusted models, current e-cigarette users had significantly lower odds of policy support compared to never users. We observed no differences in support by geographic region or strength of state-level clean indoor air policies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest high levels of public support to regulate e-cigarette flavors, marketing, and use in public places. Targeted messaging may be needed to increase support among current e-cigarette users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Use Insights\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1179173X20959700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179173X20959700\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Use Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X20959700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X20959700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:调味电子烟的广泛可得性和电子烟在公共场所的广泛使用可能是导致美国青少年和年轻人吸烟率迅速上升的原因。然而,联邦、州和地方各级的政策可以解决这些因素。目的:评估公众对5项电子烟相关政策的支持,并根据人口统计、烟草使用、电子烟危害认知、地理区域和国家级清洁室内空气政策的力度评估反应模式。方法:数据于2018年10月至12月从具有全国代表性的美国成年人在线小组(n = 3211)中收集。我们衡量了5项政策的支持度:(1)禁止销售调味电子烟;(2)要求将电子烟等烟草制品置于青少年购物场所之外;禁止在(3)所有公共场所使用电子烟;(4)餐厅;(5)棒材。加权、调整的逻辑回归模拟了政策支持的变化。结果:绝大多数(63.3%)的受访者支持禁止使用香型香烟,且支持程度与吸烟状况无差异。大多数受访者支持将烟草制品置于视线之外(78.0%),禁止在室内公共场所(82.9%)、餐馆(86.5%)和酒吧(76.1%)使用电子烟。在调整后的模型中,与从未使用过电子烟的人相比,目前使用电子烟的人获得政策支持的几率明显较低。我们观察到,在支持州级清洁室内空气政策方面,地理区域或力度没有差异。结论:结果表明公众高度支持对电子烟口味、营销和在公共场所使用进行监管。可能需要有针对性的信息传递来增加当前电子烟用户的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public Support for E-Cigarette-related Policies among a Nationally Representative Sample of US Adults.

Background: The wide availability of flavored e-cigarettes and broad use of e-cigarettes in public places may contribute to the rapidly increasing rates of use among youth and young adults in the U.S. However, policies at the federal, state and local levels can address these factors.

Objective: Assess public support for 5 e-cigarette-related policies and evaluate response patterns by demographics, tobacco use, e-cigarette harm perceptions, geographic region, and strength of state-level clean indoor air policies.

Methods: Data were collected Oct-Dec 2018 from a nationally representative online panel of U.S. adults (n = 3211). We measured support for 5 policies: (1) a ban on the sale flavored e-cigarettes; (2) requiring tobacco products, like e-cigarettes, be kept out of view in stores where adolescents shop; and prohibiting e-cigarette use in (3) all public places; (4) restaurants; and (5) bars. Weighted, adjusted logistic regressions modeled variation in policy support.

Results: A majority of respondents (63.3%) supported a flavor ban, with no differences in support by smoking status. Most respondents supported keeping tobacco products out of view (78.0%) and prohibiting e-cigarette use in indoor public places (82.9%), restaurants (86.5%), and bars (76.1%). In the adjusted models, current e-cigarette users had significantly lower odds of policy support compared to never users. We observed no differences in support by geographic region or strength of state-level clean indoor air policies.

Conclusion: Results suggest high levels of public support to regulate e-cigarette flavors, marketing, and use in public places. Targeted messaging may be needed to increase support among current e-cigarette users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
Tobacco Use Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the Digital Landscape of E-Cigarette Marketing in India: Evidence From Mixed Method Study. An Observational Study of Regulatory Violations Related to Online Tobacco Product Marketing and Retailer Responses to US FDA Warning Letters. Social Acceptability and Health Concerns of Smoking and Vaping Among University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. How Community Health Workers can Address Tobacco Dependence of High-Risk patients: A Qualitative Analysis of the Unique Training Needs of Community Health Workers. Predictors of Successful Tobacco Cessation After Receiving an E-Cigarette Based Smoking Cessation Intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1