安乐死:西班牙的趋势和观点。

I Bernal-Carcelén
{"title":"安乐死:西班牙的趋势和观点。","authors":"I Bernal-Carcelén","doi":"10.18176/resp.00020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Analyse the evolution of opinions about euthanasia by the general public and clinical physicians from 1995 to 2019 and their influence at the present time.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>Bibliographical review based on relevance and quality of publications in open access and academic access platforms. Main surveys review of public and private institutions. Congress and Senate Official Journal Sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recent surveys show that clinicians support the regulation of euthanasia. This position matches the general public's belief, which has grown steadily in recent decades.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Social and clinical support for the regulation of euthanasia has been fundamental. In the last two decades political parties have changed their positions, thus creating a window of opportunity.</p>","PeriodicalId":30044,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Sanidad Penitenciaria","volume":"22 3","pages":"112-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/63/ac/2013-6463-sanipe-22-03-112.PMC7754540.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Euthanasia: trends and opinions in Spain.\",\"authors\":\"I Bernal-Carcelén\",\"doi\":\"10.18176/resp.00020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Analyse the evolution of opinions about euthanasia by the general public and clinical physicians from 1995 to 2019 and their influence at the present time.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>Bibliographical review based on relevance and quality of publications in open access and academic access platforms. Main surveys review of public and private institutions. Congress and Senate Official Journal Sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recent surveys show that clinicians support the regulation of euthanasia. This position matches the general public's belief, which has grown steadily in recent decades.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Social and clinical support for the regulation of euthanasia has been fundamental. In the last two decades political parties have changed their positions, thus creating a window of opportunity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Sanidad Penitenciaria\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"112-115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/63/ac/2013-6463-sanipe-22-03-112.PMC7754540.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Sanidad Penitenciaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18176/resp.00020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Sanidad Penitenciaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/resp.00020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目的:分析1995 - 2019年公众和临床医生对安乐死的看法演变及其对当下的影响。材料和方法:基于开放获取和学术获取平台上出版物的相关性和质量的书目综述。公营及私营机构的主要调查及检讨。国会和参议院官方期刊会议。结果:最近的调查显示,临床医生支持对安乐死进行监管。这一立场与近几十年来稳步增长的公众观点相吻合。讨论:社会和临床对安乐死监管的支持是至关重要的。在过去的二十年里,各政党改变了立场,从而创造了一个机会之窗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Euthanasia: trends and opinions in Spain.

Objective: Analyse the evolution of opinions about euthanasia by the general public and clinical physicians from 1995 to 2019 and their influence at the present time.

Material and method: Bibliographical review based on relevance and quality of publications in open access and academic access platforms. Main surveys review of public and private institutions. Congress and Senate Official Journal Sessions.

Results: Recent surveys show that clinicians support the regulation of euthanasia. This position matches the general public's belief, which has grown steadily in recent decades.

Discussion: Social and clinical support for the regulation of euthanasia has been fundamental. In the last two decades political parties have changed their positions, thus creating a window of opportunity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical approach to a complex wound in prison: blunt trauma. COVID-19 and anxiety amongst health professionals in prisons. Effectiveness of therapeutic patient education on diabetes in prison. Evaluation of dental emergency during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Social Rehabilitation Centre of San Francisco Kobén (Campeche, Mexico). Homogeneity of pharmacological prescription and control measures applied in cases of scabies detected amongst inmates in Catalonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1