报复性人际关系问题患者的调节因素。

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-12 DOI:10.1037/pst0000349
Tohar Dolev-Amit, Catherine F Eubanks, Sigal Zilcha-Mano
{"title":"报复性人际关系问题患者的调节因素。","authors":"Tohar Dolev-Amit,&nbsp;Catherine F Eubanks,&nbsp;Sigal Zilcha-Mano","doi":"10.1037/pst0000349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals high in vindictive interpersonal problems tend to experience and express anger and irritability. In treatment, they have poor prognosis for alliance and outcome. We propose that positive expectation may serve as a moderating factor for these patients. In the current study, we examined the ability of expected alliance to act as a moderating factor in the early process and early progress of treatment for patients with vindictive interpersonal problems. A sample of 65 patients received short-term dynamic psychotherapy. At intake, before meeting the therapist, participants completed assessments for vindictive interpersonal problems and expected alliance. All therapy sessions were videotaped, and Session 2 was coded for confrontation ruptures. Early progress was assessed using the improvement from intake to Week 2 in the measure of distress from interpersonal relations. Our results show that, at high levels of vindictive interpersonal problems, higher expected alliance was associated with fewer confrontation ruptures. At high levels of vindictive interpersonal problems, higher expected alliance was associated with greater early improvement in distress from interpersonal relations. The findings demonstrate how positive expectations may function as a moderating factor that enables patients with vindictive tendencies to achieve a positive process and progress early in treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":"58 3","pages":"343-352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A moderating factor for patients with vindictive interpersonal problems.\",\"authors\":\"Tohar Dolev-Amit,&nbsp;Catherine F Eubanks,&nbsp;Sigal Zilcha-Mano\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pst0000349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Individuals high in vindictive interpersonal problems tend to experience and express anger and irritability. In treatment, they have poor prognosis for alliance and outcome. We propose that positive expectation may serve as a moderating factor for these patients. In the current study, we examined the ability of expected alliance to act as a moderating factor in the early process and early progress of treatment for patients with vindictive interpersonal problems. A sample of 65 patients received short-term dynamic psychotherapy. At intake, before meeting the therapist, participants completed assessments for vindictive interpersonal problems and expected alliance. All therapy sessions were videotaped, and Session 2 was coded for confrontation ruptures. Early progress was assessed using the improvement from intake to Week 2 in the measure of distress from interpersonal relations. Our results show that, at high levels of vindictive interpersonal problems, higher expected alliance was associated with fewer confrontation ruptures. At high levels of vindictive interpersonal problems, higher expected alliance was associated with greater early improvement in distress from interpersonal relations. The findings demonstrate how positive expectations may function as a moderating factor that enables patients with vindictive tendencies to achieve a positive process and progress early in treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"58 3\",\"pages\":\"343-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000349\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/11/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000349","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

报复性人际关系问题高的个体倾向于体验和表达愤怒和烦躁。在治疗中,他们的预后和预后都很差。我们建议积极的期望可以作为这些患者的调节因素。在本研究中,我们考察了预期联盟在报复性人际关系问题患者治疗的早期过程和早期进展中作为调节因素的能力。65名患者接受了短期动态心理治疗。在接受治疗之前,参与者完成了对报复性人际问题和预期联盟的评估。所有的治疗过程都被录了下来,第二阶段被编码为对抗破裂。早期进展评估使用改善从摄入到第2周的人际关系的痛苦测量。我们的研究结果表明,在高度报复性人际关系问题中,更高的期望联盟与更少的对抗破裂相关。在报复性人际问题水平较高的情况下,期望值越高,人际关系中痛苦的早期改善程度越高。研究结果表明,积极的期望可能作为一个调节因素,使有报复倾向的患者在治疗早期实现积极的过程和进展。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A moderating factor for patients with vindictive interpersonal problems.

Individuals high in vindictive interpersonal problems tend to experience and express anger and irritability. In treatment, they have poor prognosis for alliance and outcome. We propose that positive expectation may serve as a moderating factor for these patients. In the current study, we examined the ability of expected alliance to act as a moderating factor in the early process and early progress of treatment for patients with vindictive interpersonal problems. A sample of 65 patients received short-term dynamic psychotherapy. At intake, before meeting the therapist, participants completed assessments for vindictive interpersonal problems and expected alliance. All therapy sessions were videotaped, and Session 2 was coded for confrontation ruptures. Early progress was assessed using the improvement from intake to Week 2 in the measure of distress from interpersonal relations. Our results show that, at high levels of vindictive interpersonal problems, higher expected alliance was associated with fewer confrontation ruptures. At high levels of vindictive interpersonal problems, higher expected alliance was associated with greater early improvement in distress from interpersonal relations. The findings demonstrate how positive expectations may function as a moderating factor that enables patients with vindictive tendencies to achieve a positive process and progress early in treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.
期刊最新文献
A cultural adaptation of acceptance and commitment therapy with exercise for older Chinese with chronic pain and depressive symptoms: A mixed-methods study. Toward a liberatory counseling and psychotherapy theories pedagogy and curriculum. Increasing outcome measurement precision: Network analysis of items on the Outcome Questionnaire-45. Physiological regulation processes differentiate the experience of ruptures between patient and therapist. Questioning the status quo: Latino community members as researchers in the study of health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1