必须听到的无声的声音——女性对妇科检查的看法。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-08 DOI:10.1080/0167482X.2020.1864727
Sara Tancman, Nehama HaCohen, Gal Lazarus, Ido Solt, Lena Sagi-Dain
{"title":"必须听到的无声的声音——女性对妇科检查的看法。","authors":"Sara Tancman,&nbsp;Nehama HaCohen,&nbsp;Gal Lazarus,&nbsp;Ido Solt,&nbsp;Lena Sagi-Dain","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2020.1864727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the perception of gynecologic examination from the patients' point of view.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This anonymous electronic cross-sectional survey aimed to evaluate the subjective experiences of women during gynecologic examinations (levels of pain, embarrassment and trauma), the manner the examination was conducted, and women's suggestions for improving their experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 6,508 women answered the survey. The examination was considered an embarrassing event by 47%, painful by 35% and traumatic by 19%. Importantly, only 43% of the respondents stated they would notify the gynecologist in case of physical discomfort or pain during the examination. The quality of physician-to-patient communication was rated as the most important aspect of gynecologic examination, and showed a significant association with the general quality of the experience (levels of pain, embarrassment, and trauma). Matters relating to women's privacy during gynecologic examination were also considered important. An option for a companion was rated as important by 64% of the respondents. Significant differences with large effect-sizes were found between the respondents' preferences and their reports of the observed situation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the need for establishing guidelines for gynecologic examinations, according to a patient-centered care approach. This study constitutes a first discourse on the subject of gynecologic examinations in Israel in order to provide an overview and initial insights, serving as a starting point for further specific and more in-depth research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0167482X.2020.1864727","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Silent voices that must be heard - women's perceptions of gynecologic examinations.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Tancman,&nbsp;Nehama HaCohen,&nbsp;Gal Lazarus,&nbsp;Ido Solt,&nbsp;Lena Sagi-Dain\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0167482X.2020.1864727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the perception of gynecologic examination from the patients' point of view.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This anonymous electronic cross-sectional survey aimed to evaluate the subjective experiences of women during gynecologic examinations (levels of pain, embarrassment and trauma), the manner the examination was conducted, and women's suggestions for improving their experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 6,508 women answered the survey. The examination was considered an embarrassing event by 47%, painful by 35% and traumatic by 19%. Importantly, only 43% of the respondents stated they would notify the gynecologist in case of physical discomfort or pain during the examination. The quality of physician-to-patient communication was rated as the most important aspect of gynecologic examination, and showed a significant association with the general quality of the experience (levels of pain, embarrassment, and trauma). Matters relating to women's privacy during gynecologic examination were also considered important. An option for a companion was rated as important by 64% of the respondents. Significant differences with large effect-sizes were found between the respondents' preferences and their reports of the observed situation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the need for establishing guidelines for gynecologic examinations, according to a patient-centered care approach. This study constitutes a first discourse on the subject of gynecologic examinations in Israel in order to provide an overview and initial insights, serving as a starting point for further specific and more in-depth research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0167482X.2020.1864727\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2020.1864727\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2020.1864727","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的:从患者的角度分析对妇科检查的认识。材料和方法:这项匿名的电子横断面调查旨在评估女性在妇科检查中的主观体验(疼痛、尴尬和创伤的程度),检查的方式,以及女性对改善体验的建议。结果:总共有6508名女性接受了调查。47%的人认为这是一件令人尴尬的事情,35%的人认为是痛苦的,19%的人认为是创伤性的。重要的是,只有43%的受访者表示,如果在检查过程中出现身体不适或疼痛,他们会通知妇科医生。医患沟通的质量被认为是妇科检查中最重要的方面,并显示出与总体体验质量(疼痛、尴尬和创伤程度)的显著关联。妇科检查期间有关妇女隐私的问题也被认为很重要。64%的受访者认为伴侣的选择很重要。在被调查者的偏好和他们对观察到的情况的报告之间发现了具有大效应量的显著差异。结论:根据以患者为中心的护理方法,研究结果强调了建立妇科检查指南的必要性。本研究是对以色列妇科检查主题的首次论述,旨在提供概述和初步见解,作为进一步具体和深入研究的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Silent voices that must be heard - women's perceptions of gynecologic examinations.

Purpose: To analyze the perception of gynecologic examination from the patients' point of view.

Materials and methods: This anonymous electronic cross-sectional survey aimed to evaluate the subjective experiences of women during gynecologic examinations (levels of pain, embarrassment and trauma), the manner the examination was conducted, and women's suggestions for improving their experience.

Results: Overall, 6,508 women answered the survey. The examination was considered an embarrassing event by 47%, painful by 35% and traumatic by 19%. Importantly, only 43% of the respondents stated they would notify the gynecologist in case of physical discomfort or pain during the examination. The quality of physician-to-patient communication was rated as the most important aspect of gynecologic examination, and showed a significant association with the general quality of the experience (levels of pain, embarrassment, and trauma). Matters relating to women's privacy during gynecologic examination were also considered important. An option for a companion was rated as important by 64% of the respondents. Significant differences with large effect-sizes were found between the respondents' preferences and their reports of the observed situation.

Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for establishing guidelines for gynecologic examinations, according to a patient-centered care approach. This study constitutes a first discourse on the subject of gynecologic examinations in Israel in order to provide an overview and initial insights, serving as a starting point for further specific and more in-depth research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology was founded in 1982 in order to provide a scientific forum for obstetricians, gynecologists, psychiatrists and psychologists, academic health professionals as well as for all those who are interested in the psychosocial and psychosomatic aspects of women’s health. Another of its aims is to stimulate obstetricians and gynecologists to pay more attention to this very important facet of their profession.
期刊最新文献
Retracted article: The effects of fish oil omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on mental health parameters and metabolic status of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Effect of social support on fetal movement self-monitoring behavior in Chinese women: a moderated mediation model of health beliefs. The role and outcomes of music therapy during pregnancy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Assessment of factors related to poly cystic ovarian syndrome - A comparative and correlational study. Investigating socioeconomic disparities of Kangaroo mother care on preterm infant health outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1