脊髓刺激疗法在多发性硬化症患者的治疗中占有一席之地吗?文献系统回顾。

IF 1.3 Q3 SURGERY Minimally Invasive Surgery Pub Date : 2021-04-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/9969010
Alessandro Rapisarda, Eleonora Ioannoni, Alessandro Izzo, Manuela D'Ercole, Nicola Montano
{"title":"脊髓刺激疗法在多发性硬化症患者的治疗中占有一席之地吗?文献系统回顾。","authors":"Alessandro Rapisarda, Eleonora Ioannoni, Alessandro Izzo, Manuela D'Ercole, Nicola Montano","doi":"10.1155/2021/9969010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive technique mainly used to treat neuropathic pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome. However, this therapy has been utilized to treat other chronic painful conditions, such as pain associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). Nonetheless, the efficacy of SCS in MS patients has not been fully established. In fact, in most of SCS series, MS patients represent only a subset of a bigger cohort which comprises different causes of pain, motor disorder, and other functional limitations. The aim of our study was to systematically review the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of SCS in MS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed through different databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) using the following terms: \"multiple sclerosis,\" \"spinal cord stimulation,\" and \"dorsal column stimulation,\" according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 452 articles were reviewed, and 7 studies were included in the present analysis. 373 MS patients were submitted to a stimulation trial, and 82 MS patients underwent a de novo implantation. 285/373 (76.4%) of cases submitted to the SCS trial were enrolled for permanent stimulation. We found a long-lasting improvement in 193/346 (55.8%) MS patients with motor disorders, in 90/134 (67.13%) MS patients with urinary dysfunction, and in 28/34 (82.35%) MS patients with neuropathic pain. The efficacy of SCS was higher for urinary dysfunction (<i>p</i> = 0.0144) and neuropathic pain (<i>p</i> = 0.0030) compared with motor disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our systematic review evidences that SCS is effective in MS patients. Urinary dysfunction and pain symptoms seem to be most responsive to SCS. Further studies are needed to improve the patient selection and clarify the best timing to perform SCS in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":"2021 ","pages":"9969010"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8079186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is There a Place for Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis? A Systematic Review of the Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Rapisarda, Eleonora Ioannoni, Alessandro Izzo, Manuela D'Ercole, Nicola Montano\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/9969010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive technique mainly used to treat neuropathic pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome. However, this therapy has been utilized to treat other chronic painful conditions, such as pain associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). Nonetheless, the efficacy of SCS in MS patients has not been fully established. In fact, in most of SCS series, MS patients represent only a subset of a bigger cohort which comprises different causes of pain, motor disorder, and other functional limitations. The aim of our study was to systematically review the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of SCS in MS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed through different databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) using the following terms: \\\"multiple sclerosis,\\\" \\\"spinal cord stimulation,\\\" and \\\"dorsal column stimulation,\\\" according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 452 articles were reviewed, and 7 studies were included in the present analysis. 373 MS patients were submitted to a stimulation trial, and 82 MS patients underwent a de novo implantation. 285/373 (76.4%) of cases submitted to the SCS trial were enrolled for permanent stimulation. We found a long-lasting improvement in 193/346 (55.8%) MS patients with motor disorders, in 90/134 (67.13%) MS patients with urinary dysfunction, and in 28/34 (82.35%) MS patients with neuropathic pain. The efficacy of SCS was higher for urinary dysfunction (<i>p</i> = 0.0144) and neuropathic pain (<i>p</i> = 0.0030) compared with motor disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our systematic review evidences that SCS is effective in MS patients. Urinary dysfunction and pain symptoms seem to be most responsive to SCS. Further studies are needed to improve the patient selection and clarify the best timing to perform SCS in these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minimally Invasive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"2021 \",\"pages\":\"9969010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8079186/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minimally Invasive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9969010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9969010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脊髓刺激(SCS)是一种微创技术,主要用于治疗与背部手术失败综合征相关的神经性疼痛。不过,这种疗法也被用于治疗其他慢性疼痛病症,如与多发性硬化症(MS)相关的疼痛。然而,SCS 对多发性硬化症患者的疗效尚未完全确定。事实上,在大多数 SCS 系列研究中,多发性硬化症患者只是由不同原因引起的疼痛、运动障碍和其他功能限制的更大群体中的一个子集。我们的研究旨在系统地回顾文献,评估多发性硬化症患者接受 SCS 治疗的效果:通过不同的数据库(PubMed、Scopus 和 Embase)使用以下术语进行文献检索:根据 PRISMA(系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目)指南,使用 "多发性硬化症"、"脊髓刺激 "和 "背柱刺激 "进行了文献检索:结果:共审查了 452 篇文章,其中 7 项研究被纳入本次分析。373名多发性硬化症患者接受了刺激试验,82名多发性硬化症患者重新接受了植入治疗。提交 SCS 试验的病例中有 285/373 例(76.4%)接受了永久性刺激。我们发现,193 名/346 名(55.8%)多发性硬化症患者的运动障碍、90 名/134 名(67.13%)多发性硬化症患者的排尿功能障碍以及 28 名/34 名(82.35%)多发性硬化症患者的神经性疼痛均得到了长期改善。与运动障碍相比,SCS对排尿功能障碍(p = 0.0144)和神经性疼痛(p = 0.0030)的疗效更高:我们的系统综述证明,SCS 对多发性硬化症患者有效。排尿功能障碍和疼痛症状似乎对 SCS 最有疗效。还需要进一步研究,以改进患者选择,并明确对这些患者实施 SCS 的最佳时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is There a Place for Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Objective: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive technique mainly used to treat neuropathic pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome. However, this therapy has been utilized to treat other chronic painful conditions, such as pain associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). Nonetheless, the efficacy of SCS in MS patients has not been fully established. In fact, in most of SCS series, MS patients represent only a subset of a bigger cohort which comprises different causes of pain, motor disorder, and other functional limitations. The aim of our study was to systematically review the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of SCS in MS patients.

Methods: A literature search was performed through different databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) using the following terms: "multiple sclerosis," "spinal cord stimulation," and "dorsal column stimulation," according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines.

Results: A total of 452 articles were reviewed, and 7 studies were included in the present analysis. 373 MS patients were submitted to a stimulation trial, and 82 MS patients underwent a de novo implantation. 285/373 (76.4%) of cases submitted to the SCS trial were enrolled for permanent stimulation. We found a long-lasting improvement in 193/346 (55.8%) MS patients with motor disorders, in 90/134 (67.13%) MS patients with urinary dysfunction, and in 28/34 (82.35%) MS patients with neuropathic pain. The efficacy of SCS was higher for urinary dysfunction (p = 0.0144) and neuropathic pain (p = 0.0030) compared with motor disorders.

Conclusions: Our systematic review evidences that SCS is effective in MS patients. Urinary dysfunction and pain symptoms seem to be most responsive to SCS. Further studies are needed to improve the patient selection and clarify the best timing to perform SCS in these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Mortality and Postoperative Complications Between Open and Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: An Umbrella Review. Initial Experience of Robot-Assisted Nephroureterectomy without Intraoperative Repositioning Using a New Robotic Surgical System (KD-SR-01TM). Comparison of Perioperative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes of Transperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Gastrectomy in Patients with Situs Inversus Totalis: A Systematic Review. Clinical Factors to Predict Difficult Ureter during Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1