科胡特作品中前沿的起源。

Q4 Medicine Psychoanalytic Review Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1521/prev.2021.108.2.169
Peter Zimmermann, Harry Paul
{"title":"科胡特作品中前沿的起源。","authors":"Peter Zimmermann,&nbsp;Harry Paul","doi":"10.1521/prev.2021.108.2.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article traces the evolution of the concept of the leading edge in Kohut's work. The leading edge is defined as the growth-promoting dimension of the transference. The authors argue that although Kohut did not ever use the term explicitly in his writings-Marian Tolpin (2002), one of Kohut's gifted pupils, introduced the concept into the psychoanalytic literature in the form of the forward edge-the idea of the leading edge was already present in nascent form in Kohut's earliest papers and became ever more central as his psychology of the self evolved and the concept of the selfobject transference took center stage. Kohut, it is argued, could not fully develop the idea of working with the leading edge for fear of being accused of advocating for a corrective emotional experience in psychoanalytic treatment. However, in his posthumous empathy paper (1982) Kohut came as close as he could to endorsing the leading edge as pivotal in all psychoanalytic work.</p>","PeriodicalId":39855,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Review","volume":"108 2","pages":"169-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Origins of the Leading Edge in Kohut's Work.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Zimmermann,&nbsp;Harry Paul\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/prev.2021.108.2.169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article traces the evolution of the concept of the leading edge in Kohut's work. The leading edge is defined as the growth-promoting dimension of the transference. The authors argue that although Kohut did not ever use the term explicitly in his writings-Marian Tolpin (2002), one of Kohut's gifted pupils, introduced the concept into the psychoanalytic literature in the form of the forward edge-the idea of the leading edge was already present in nascent form in Kohut's earliest papers and became ever more central as his psychology of the self evolved and the concept of the selfobject transference took center stage. Kohut, it is argued, could not fully develop the idea of working with the leading edge for fear of being accused of advocating for a corrective emotional experience in psychoanalytic treatment. However, in his posthumous empathy paper (1982) Kohut came as close as he could to endorsing the leading edge as pivotal in all psychoanalytic work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychoanalytic Review\",\"volume\":\"108 2\",\"pages\":\"169-196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychoanalytic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.2021.108.2.169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoanalytic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.2021.108.2.169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文追溯了科胡特作品中前沿概念的演变。前缘被定义为移情的促进成长维度。作者认为,尽管科胡特从未在他的作品中明确使用过这个术语——科胡特的天才学生之一玛丽安·托尔平(marian Tolpin, 2002)以前沿的形式将这个概念引入精神分析文学——前沿的概念在科胡特最早的论文中已经以新生的形式出现,随着他的自我心理学的发展和自我客体转移的概念占据中心舞台,前沿的概念变得越来越重要。有人认为,科胡特没有充分发展与前沿合作的想法,因为他害怕被指责在精神分析治疗中倡导纠正性情感体验。然而,在他死后发表的共情论文(1982年)中,科胡特尽可能地赞同前沿是所有精神分析工作的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Origins of the Leading Edge in Kohut's Work.

This article traces the evolution of the concept of the leading edge in Kohut's work. The leading edge is defined as the growth-promoting dimension of the transference. The authors argue that although Kohut did not ever use the term explicitly in his writings-Marian Tolpin (2002), one of Kohut's gifted pupils, introduced the concept into the psychoanalytic literature in the form of the forward edge-the idea of the leading edge was already present in nascent form in Kohut's earliest papers and became ever more central as his psychology of the self evolved and the concept of the selfobject transference took center stage. Kohut, it is argued, could not fully develop the idea of working with the leading edge for fear of being accused of advocating for a corrective emotional experience in psychoanalytic treatment. However, in his posthumous empathy paper (1982) Kohut came as close as he could to endorsing the leading edge as pivotal in all psychoanalytic work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychoanalytic Review
Psychoanalytic Review Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: In six issues per year, The Psychoanalytic Review publishes peer-reviewed articles on a wide range of theoretical, clinical and cultural topics, including interdisciplinary studies, which help advance psychoanalytic theory and understanding of therapeutic process. Special Issues, organized by guest editors with recognized knowledge in a specific area within the field of psychoanalysis or intersecting with it, are an important feature of the Review. The journal also publishes reviews of books and films of interest to psychoanalysis.
期刊最新文献
Conversation With Mark Solms. A Note on a Genre. An Analyst's Hallucination as a Manifestation of Osmotic Communication. Finding Integration in a Splintered World: Contemporary Psychoanalytic Thoughts on Clinical Work. From Anxiety to Aesthetics: "Rank Horror: An International Symposium".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1