心理韧性情境判断测验的开发:心理韧性评估的新方法。

Journal of applied measurement Pub Date : 2020-01-01
Nicholas M Flannery, Neil M A Hauenstein, E Scott Geller
{"title":"心理韧性情境判断测验的开发:心理韧性评估的新方法。","authors":"Nicholas M Flannery,&nbsp;Neil M A Hauenstein,&nbsp;E Scott Geller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mental toughness (MT) predicts outcomes across several high-stress contexts such as athletics, the military, and the workplace. Despite this, researchers have struggled to reach consensus regarding how best to conceptualize and measure MT. MT assessments have focused on measuring general MT rather than domain-specific MT. The current study proposed a measurement model of MT grounded in social-cognitive theory and introduced an assessment of MT within a situational judgment context relevant to the workplace. Participants completed the new MT measure as well as assessments to establish construct validity. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses suggested a three-factor solution fit the data best, consisting of task persistence, emotional control, and utilization of feedback. Cross-structure analyses indicated that the new assessment avoided common-method bias in responding, evidenced by weak correlations with measures of other constructs. The results provided initial evidence to continue research on using a situational judgment test to measure MT.</p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"21 4","pages":"434-455"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Development of the Mental Toughness Situational Judgment Test: A Novel Approach to Assessing Mental Toughness.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas M Flannery,&nbsp;Neil M A Hauenstein,&nbsp;E Scott Geller\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mental toughness (MT) predicts outcomes across several high-stress contexts such as athletics, the military, and the workplace. Despite this, researchers have struggled to reach consensus regarding how best to conceptualize and measure MT. MT assessments have focused on measuring general MT rather than domain-specific MT. The current study proposed a measurement model of MT grounded in social-cognitive theory and introduced an assessment of MT within a situational judgment context relevant to the workplace. Participants completed the new MT measure as well as assessments to establish construct validity. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses suggested a three-factor solution fit the data best, consisting of task persistence, emotional control, and utilization of feedback. Cross-structure analyses indicated that the new assessment avoided common-method bias in responding, evidenced by weak correlations with measures of other constructs. The results provided initial evidence to continue research on using a situational judgment test to measure MT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"434-455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理韧性(MT)可以预测在体育、军事和工作场所等几种高压力环境下的结果。尽管如此,研究人员一直在努力就如何最好地概念化和测量MT达成共识。MT评估侧重于测量一般MT,而不是特定领域MT。目前的研究提出了一个基于社会认知理论的MT测量模型,并在与工作场所相关的情境判断背景下引入了MT评估。参与者完成了新的MT测量和评估,以建立构念效度。探索性和验证性因素分析都表明,三因素解决方案最适合数据,包括任务持久性,情绪控制和反馈的利用。交叉结构分析表明,新的评估避免了共同方法的偏差,证明了与其他结构的测量的弱相关性。研究结果为后续使用情境判断测试来测量MT的研究提供了初步依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Development of the Mental Toughness Situational Judgment Test: A Novel Approach to Assessing Mental Toughness.

Mental toughness (MT) predicts outcomes across several high-stress contexts such as athletics, the military, and the workplace. Despite this, researchers have struggled to reach consensus regarding how best to conceptualize and measure MT. MT assessments have focused on measuring general MT rather than domain-specific MT. The current study proposed a measurement model of MT grounded in social-cognitive theory and introduced an assessment of MT within a situational judgment context relevant to the workplace. Participants completed the new MT measure as well as assessments to establish construct validity. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses suggested a three-factor solution fit the data best, consisting of task persistence, emotional control, and utilization of feedback. Cross-structure analyses indicated that the new assessment avoided common-method bias in responding, evidenced by weak correlations with measures of other constructs. The results provided initial evidence to continue research on using a situational judgment test to measure MT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validation of Egalitarian Education Questionnaire using Rasch Measurement Model. Bootstrap Estimate of Bias for Intraclass Correlation. Rasch's Logistic Model Applied to Growth. Psychometric Properties of the General Movement Optimality Score using Rasch Measurement. Rasch Analysis of the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale: Evidence for the Abbreviated Version.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1