与组织病理学相比,14C 尿素呼气试验对印尼消化不良患者幽门螺旋杆菌检测的诊断价值

IF 2.5 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2021-06-14 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEG.S306626
Muhammad Miftahussurur, Adinta Windia, Ari Fahrial Syam, Iswan Abbas Nusi, Ricky Indra Alfaray, Kartika Afrida Fauzia, Hartono Kahar, Herry Purbayu, Titong Sugihartono, Poernomo Boedi Setiawan, Ummi Maimunah, Ulfa Kholili, Husin Thamrin, Amie Vidyani, Dalla Doohan, Langgeng Agung Waskito, Yudith Annisa Ayu Rezkitha, Gontar Alamsyah Siregar, Yoshio Yamaoka
{"title":"与组织病理学相比,14C 尿素呼气试验对印尼消化不良患者幽门螺旋杆菌检测的诊断价值","authors":"Muhammad Miftahussurur, Adinta Windia, Ari Fahrial Syam, Iswan Abbas Nusi, Ricky Indra Alfaray, Kartika Afrida Fauzia, Hartono Kahar, Herry Purbayu, Titong Sugihartono, Poernomo Boedi Setiawan, Ummi Maimunah, Ulfa Kholili, Husin Thamrin, Amie Vidyani, Dalla Doohan, Langgeng Agung Waskito, Yudith Annisa Ayu Rezkitha, Gontar Alamsyah Siregar, Yoshio Yamaoka","doi":"10.2147/CEG.S306626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Histopathology method is often used as a gold standard diagnostic for <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection in Indonesia. However, it requires an endoscopic procedure which is limited in Indonesia. A non-invasive method, such as <sup>14</sup>C Urea Breath Test (UBT), is more favorable; however, this particular method has not been validated yet.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 55 dyspeptic patients underwent gastroscopy and <sup>14</sup>C-UBT test. We used Heliprobe<sup>®</sup> UBT for UBT test. As for the histology, May-Giemsa staining of two gastric biopsies (from the antrum and corpus) were evaluated following the Updated Sydney System.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis showed that the optimum cut-off value was 57 with excellence Area under Curve = 0.955 (95% CI = 0.861-1.000). By applying the optimum cut-off value, Heliprobe<sup>®</sup> UBT showed 92.31% for sensitivity, 97.62% for specificity, 92.31% for positive predictive value, 97.62% for negative predictive value, 38.77 for positive likelihood ratio, 0.0788 for negative likelihood ratio, and 96.36% for the accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The <sup>14</sup>C-UBT is an accurate test for <i>H. pylori</i> diagnosis with excellent sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The different optimum cut-off points suggested that a validation is absolutely necessary for new test prior application to the new population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10208,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology","volume":"14 ","pages":"291-296"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b5/69/ceg-14-291.PMC8213946.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Value of <sup>14</sup>C Urea Breath Test for <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> Detection Compared by Histopathology in Indonesian Dyspeptic Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Miftahussurur, Adinta Windia, Ari Fahrial Syam, Iswan Abbas Nusi, Ricky Indra Alfaray, Kartika Afrida Fauzia, Hartono Kahar, Herry Purbayu, Titong Sugihartono, Poernomo Boedi Setiawan, Ummi Maimunah, Ulfa Kholili, Husin Thamrin, Amie Vidyani, Dalla Doohan, Langgeng Agung Waskito, Yudith Annisa Ayu Rezkitha, Gontar Alamsyah Siregar, Yoshio Yamaoka\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CEG.S306626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Histopathology method is often used as a gold standard diagnostic for <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection in Indonesia. However, it requires an endoscopic procedure which is limited in Indonesia. A non-invasive method, such as <sup>14</sup>C Urea Breath Test (UBT), is more favorable; however, this particular method has not been validated yet.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 55 dyspeptic patients underwent gastroscopy and <sup>14</sup>C-UBT test. We used Heliprobe<sup>®</sup> UBT for UBT test. As for the histology, May-Giemsa staining of two gastric biopsies (from the antrum and corpus) were evaluated following the Updated Sydney System.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis showed that the optimum cut-off value was 57 with excellence Area under Curve = 0.955 (95% CI = 0.861-1.000). By applying the optimum cut-off value, Heliprobe<sup>®</sup> UBT showed 92.31% for sensitivity, 97.62% for specificity, 92.31% for positive predictive value, 97.62% for negative predictive value, 38.77 for positive likelihood ratio, 0.0788 for negative likelihood ratio, and 96.36% for the accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The <sup>14</sup>C-UBT is an accurate test for <i>H. pylori</i> diagnosis with excellent sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The different optimum cut-off points suggested that a validation is absolutely necessary for new test prior application to the new population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"291-296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b5/69/ceg-14-291.PMC8213946.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S306626\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S306626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在印度尼西亚,组织病理学方法通常被用作诊断幽门螺旋杆菌感染的金标准。然而,这种方法需要进行内窥镜检查,这在印尼是有限的。14C尿素呼气试验(UBT)等非侵入性方法更为有利,但这种特殊方法尚未得到验证:共有 55 名消化不良患者接受了胃镜检查和 14C-UBT 测试。我们使用 Heliprobe® UBT 进行 UBT 检测。在组织学方面,我们按照 "最新悉尼系统 "对两份胃活检组织(分别来自胃窦和胃体)进行了 May-Giemsa 染色评估:接收者工作特征分析显示,最佳临界值为 57,卓越曲线下面积 = 0.955 (95% CI = 0.861-1.000)。采用最佳临界值后,Heliprobe® UBT 的灵敏度为 92.31%,特异度为 97.62%,阳性预测值为 92.31%,阴性预测值为 97.62%,阳性似然比为 38.77,阴性似然比为 0.0788,准确率为 96.36%:14C-UPT是一种准确的幽门螺杆菌诊断检测方法,具有极佳的敏感性、特异性和准确性。不同的最佳临界点表明,新检测方法在应用于新人群之前绝对有必要进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Value of 14C Urea Breath Test for Helicobacter pylori Detection Compared by Histopathology in Indonesian Dyspeptic Patients.

Purpose: Histopathology method is often used as a gold standard diagnostic for Helicobacter pylori infection in Indonesia. However, it requires an endoscopic procedure which is limited in Indonesia. A non-invasive method, such as 14C Urea Breath Test (UBT), is more favorable; however, this particular method has not been validated yet.

Patients and methods: A total of 55 dyspeptic patients underwent gastroscopy and 14C-UBT test. We used Heliprobe® UBT for UBT test. As for the histology, May-Giemsa staining of two gastric biopsies (from the antrum and corpus) were evaluated following the Updated Sydney System.

Results: The Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis showed that the optimum cut-off value was 57 with excellence Area under Curve = 0.955 (95% CI = 0.861-1.000). By applying the optimum cut-off value, Heliprobe® UBT showed 92.31% for sensitivity, 97.62% for specificity, 92.31% for positive predictive value, 97.62% for negative predictive value, 38.77 for positive likelihood ratio, 0.0788 for negative likelihood ratio, and 96.36% for the accuracy.

Conclusion: The 14C-UBT is an accurate test for H. pylori diagnosis with excellent sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The different optimum cut-off points suggested that a validation is absolutely necessary for new test prior application to the new population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic Potential of Etrasimod in the Management of Moderately-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Evidence to Date. Correlation Between Tumor Budding and Survivin Expression in Colorectal Cancer. Predicting Survival Among Colorectal Cancer Patients: Development and Validation of Polygenic Survival Score. Refractory Crohn's Disease: Perspectives, Unmet Needs and Innovations. Patient-Generated Images in Perianal Disease: An Evolving Tool in Proctology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1