使用移动应用程序进行主观视觉垂直测试以检测前庭病理的有效性。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3233/VES-201526
Laura Riera-Tur, Andres Caballero-Garcia, Antonio J Martin-Mateos, Alfonso M Lechuga-Sancho
{"title":"使用移动应用程序进行主观视觉垂直测试以检测前庭病理的有效性。","authors":"Laura Riera-Tur,&nbsp;Andres Caballero-Garcia,&nbsp;Antonio J Martin-Mateos,&nbsp;Alfonso M Lechuga-Sancho","doi":"10.3233/VES-201526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The subjective visual vertical (SVV) test is a sensitive test of vestibular dysfunction that allows the evaluation of otolithic organs; however, with the current method, there are technical and logistical limitations that make the application of this test difficult in the conventional clinic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of detecting vestibular pathology using the SVV via a new screening method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive sample of 62 patients with suspected vestibular pathology was included in the study. The patients were clinically diagnosed according to the Barany Society criteria. An exploratory system was designed using a mobile application in Android that detects accelerometer oscillations and involves placing the smartphone on a rotating disk anchored to the wall. All patients underwent a SVV examination using the bucket method and the study test. A cut-off point of the ROC curve was calculated for each test, and its sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy and probability ratios for detecting vestibular pathology were analysed. The SVV results were compared using the bucket test and the study test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed significant differences in sensitivity between the two tests: 86.95% for the study test versus 67.4% for the bucket test (p < 0.01). In the ROC curve, an area under the curve of 0.90 was observed for the study test, with a cut-off of 2.43 for a sensitivity of 86.95% and a specificity of 93.75%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SVV testing using a smartphone placed on a rotating disk anchored to the wall offers greater diagnostic accuracy than SVV using the bucket test. Both methods are inexpensive, harmless and easily accepted by patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/VES-201526","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of the subjective visual vertical test performed using a mobile application to detect vestibular pathology.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Riera-Tur,&nbsp;Andres Caballero-Garcia,&nbsp;Antonio J Martin-Mateos,&nbsp;Alfonso M Lechuga-Sancho\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/VES-201526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The subjective visual vertical (SVV) test is a sensitive test of vestibular dysfunction that allows the evaluation of otolithic organs; however, with the current method, there are technical and logistical limitations that make the application of this test difficult in the conventional clinic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of detecting vestibular pathology using the SVV via a new screening method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive sample of 62 patients with suspected vestibular pathology was included in the study. The patients were clinically diagnosed according to the Barany Society criteria. An exploratory system was designed using a mobile application in Android that detects accelerometer oscillations and involves placing the smartphone on a rotating disk anchored to the wall. All patients underwent a SVV examination using the bucket method and the study test. A cut-off point of the ROC curve was calculated for each test, and its sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy and probability ratios for detecting vestibular pathology were analysed. The SVV results were compared using the bucket test and the study test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed significant differences in sensitivity between the two tests: 86.95% for the study test versus 67.4% for the bucket test (p < 0.01). In the ROC curve, an area under the curve of 0.90 was observed for the study test, with a cut-off of 2.43 for a sensitivity of 86.95% and a specificity of 93.75%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SVV testing using a smartphone placed on a rotating disk anchored to the wall offers greater diagnostic accuracy than SVV using the bucket test. Both methods are inexpensive, harmless and easily accepted by patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/VES-201526\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-201526\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-201526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:主观视觉垂直(SVV)测试是前庭功能障碍的敏感测试,可以评估耳石器官;然而,使用目前的方法,存在技术和后勤限制,使得该测试难以在常规临床中应用。目的:本研究的目的是通过一种新的筛选方法来评估SVV检测前庭病理的有效性。方法:连续62例疑似前庭病变患者纳入研究。根据Barany Society标准对患者进行临床诊断。研究人员利用Android上的移动应用程序设计了一个探索系统,该系统可以检测加速度计的振荡,并将智能手机放在固定在墙上的旋转圆盘上。所有患者均采用桶法和研究试验进行SVV检查。计算各试验的ROC曲线截断点,并分析其灵敏度、特异度、诊断准确率和检测前庭病理的概率比。采用桶试验和研究试验对SVV结果进行比较。结果:我们观察到两种测试之间的敏感性存在显著差异:研究测试的敏感性为86.95%,而桶测试的敏感性为67.4% (p结论:使用智能手机放置在固定在墙上的旋转磁盘上进行SVV测试比使用桶测试提供更高的SVV诊断准确性。这两种方法都是廉价、无害且容易被患者接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of the subjective visual vertical test performed using a mobile application to detect vestibular pathology.

Background: The subjective visual vertical (SVV) test is a sensitive test of vestibular dysfunction that allows the evaluation of otolithic organs; however, with the current method, there are technical and logistical limitations that make the application of this test difficult in the conventional clinic.

Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of detecting vestibular pathology using the SVV via a new screening method.

Methods: A consecutive sample of 62 patients with suspected vestibular pathology was included in the study. The patients were clinically diagnosed according to the Barany Society criteria. An exploratory system was designed using a mobile application in Android that detects accelerometer oscillations and involves placing the smartphone on a rotating disk anchored to the wall. All patients underwent a SVV examination using the bucket method and the study test. A cut-off point of the ROC curve was calculated for each test, and its sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy and probability ratios for detecting vestibular pathology were analysed. The SVV results were compared using the bucket test and the study test.

Results: We observed significant differences in sensitivity between the two tests: 86.95% for the study test versus 67.4% for the bucket test (p < 0.01). In the ROC curve, an area under the curve of 0.90 was observed for the study test, with a cut-off of 2.43 for a sensitivity of 86.95% and a specificity of 93.75%.

Conclusions: SVV testing using a smartphone placed on a rotating disk anchored to the wall offers greater diagnostic accuracy than SVV using the bucket test. Both methods are inexpensive, harmless and easily accepted by patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Vestibular Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes experimental and observational studies, review papers, and theoretical papers based on current knowledge of the vestibular system. Subjects of the studies can include experimental animals, normal humans, and humans with vestibular or other related disorders. Study topics can include the following: Anatomy of the vestibular system, including vestibulo-ocular, vestibulo-spinal, and vestibulo-autonomic pathways Balance disorders Neurochemistry and neuropharmacology of balance, both at the systems and single neuron level Neurophysiology of balance, including the vestibular, ocular motor, autonomic, and postural control systems Psychophysics of spatial orientation Space and motion sickness Vestibular rehabilitation Vestibular-related human performance in various environments
期刊最新文献
Vestibular migraine as a mimic of benign paroxysmal positioning vertigo and Meniere's disease. Effects of monaural sound stimulation on subjective visual vertical. Simulator sickness among helicopter pilots: Incidence, threshold and severity using the SSQ. The vestibular symptomatology of Machado-Joseph Disease. Is vestibular function related to human hippocampal volume?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1