在体内动物模型中使用肥皂和水基皮肤去污的功效:系统综述。

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews Pub Date : 2021-10-03 Epub Date: 2021-07-18 DOI:10.1080/10937404.2021.1943087
Anuk Burli, Nadia Kashetsky, Aileen Feschuk, Rebecca M Law, Howard I Maibach
{"title":"在体内动物模型中使用肥皂和水基皮肤去污的功效:系统综述。","authors":"Anuk Burli,&nbsp;Nadia Kashetsky,&nbsp;Aileen Feschuk,&nbsp;Rebecca M Law,&nbsp;Howard I Maibach","doi":"10.1080/10937404.2021.1943087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Water-only or soap and water solutions are considered a gold standard for skin decontamination. However, there is lack of conclusive data regarding their efficacy. The aim of this study was to summarize <i>in vivo</i> animal model data on skin decontamination using water-only, and/or soap and water. Covidence, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched to identify relevant articles using water-only or soap and water decontamination methods in <i>in vivo</i> animals. Data extraction was completed from studies, representing three animal models, and 11 contaminants. Results demonstrated water-only decontamination solutions led to complete decontamination in 3.1% (n = 16/524) protocols, incomplete decontamination in 90.6% (n = 475/524) of protocols, and mortality in 6.3% (n = 33/524) of protocols. Soap and water decontamination solutions resulted in complete decontamination in 6.9% (n = 8/116) protocols, incomplete decontamination in 92.2% (n = 107/116) of protocols, and mortality in 6.9% (n = 8/116) of protocols. Although water only, or soap and water is considered a gold standard for skin decontamination, most papers investigated found that water only, and soap and water provided incomplete decontamination. Due to the insufficient data, and limitations that hinder the applicability of available data, evidence indicates that more contemporary studies investigating skin decontamination are needed, and compared to other model species, including humans, when practical.</p>","PeriodicalId":49971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","volume":"24 7","pages":"325-336"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10937404.2021.1943087","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of soap and water based skin decontamination using <i>in vivo</i> animal models: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Anuk Burli,&nbsp;Nadia Kashetsky,&nbsp;Aileen Feschuk,&nbsp;Rebecca M Law,&nbsp;Howard I Maibach\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10937404.2021.1943087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Water-only or soap and water solutions are considered a gold standard for skin decontamination. However, there is lack of conclusive data regarding their efficacy. The aim of this study was to summarize <i>in vivo</i> animal model data on skin decontamination using water-only, and/or soap and water. Covidence, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched to identify relevant articles using water-only or soap and water decontamination methods in <i>in vivo</i> animals. Data extraction was completed from studies, representing three animal models, and 11 contaminants. Results demonstrated water-only decontamination solutions led to complete decontamination in 3.1% (n = 16/524) protocols, incomplete decontamination in 90.6% (n = 475/524) of protocols, and mortality in 6.3% (n = 33/524) of protocols. Soap and water decontamination solutions resulted in complete decontamination in 6.9% (n = 8/116) protocols, incomplete decontamination in 92.2% (n = 107/116) of protocols, and mortality in 6.9% (n = 8/116) of protocols. Although water only, or soap and water is considered a gold standard for skin decontamination, most papers investigated found that water only, and soap and water provided incomplete decontamination. Due to the insufficient data, and limitations that hinder the applicability of available data, evidence indicates that more contemporary studies investigating skin decontamination are needed, and compared to other model species, including humans, when practical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews\",\"volume\":\"24 7\",\"pages\":\"325-336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10937404.2021.1943087\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2021.1943087\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2021.1943087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

纯水或肥皂和水溶液被认为是皮肤净化的黄金标准。然而,缺乏关于其功效的结论性数据。本研究的目的是总结使用纯水和/或肥皂和水进行皮肤去污的体内动物模型数据。检索covid、Embase、MEDLINE、PubMed、Web of Science和Google Scholar,以在体内动物中使用纯水或肥皂和水去污方法识别相关文章。数据提取从研究中完成,代表三种动物模型,11种污染物。结果表明,纯水去污方案导致3.1% (n = 16/524)的方案完全去污,90.6% (n = 475/524)的方案不完全去污,6.3% (n = 33/524)的方案死亡率。肥皂和水去污溶液导致6.9% (n = 8/116)的方案完全去污,92.2% (n = 107/116)的方案完全去污,6.9% (n = 8/116)的方案死亡。虽然仅用水或肥皂和水被认为是皮肤去污的黄金标准,但大多数研究论文发现,仅用水、肥皂和水只能提供不完全的去污。由于数据不足,以及阻碍现有数据适用性的局限性,有证据表明,需要更多的当代研究来调查皮肤去污染,并在实际情况下与其他模式物种(包括人类)进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of soap and water based skin decontamination using in vivo animal models: a systematic review.

Water-only or soap and water solutions are considered a gold standard for skin decontamination. However, there is lack of conclusive data regarding their efficacy. The aim of this study was to summarize in vivo animal model data on skin decontamination using water-only, and/or soap and water. Covidence, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched to identify relevant articles using water-only or soap and water decontamination methods in in vivo animals. Data extraction was completed from studies, representing three animal models, and 11 contaminants. Results demonstrated water-only decontamination solutions led to complete decontamination in 3.1% (n = 16/524) protocols, incomplete decontamination in 90.6% (n = 475/524) of protocols, and mortality in 6.3% (n = 33/524) of protocols. Soap and water decontamination solutions resulted in complete decontamination in 6.9% (n = 8/116) protocols, incomplete decontamination in 92.2% (n = 107/116) of protocols, and mortality in 6.9% (n = 8/116) of protocols. Although water only, or soap and water is considered a gold standard for skin decontamination, most papers investigated found that water only, and soap and water provided incomplete decontamination. Due to the insufficient data, and limitations that hinder the applicability of available data, evidence indicates that more contemporary studies investigating skin decontamination are needed, and compared to other model species, including humans, when practical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: Part B - Critical Reviews" is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis, focusing on the critical examination of research in the areas of environmental exposure and population health. With an ISSN identifier of 1093-7404, this journal has established itself as a significant source of scholarly content in the field of toxicology and environmental health. Since its inception, the journal has published over 424 articles that have garnered 35,097 citations, reflecting its impact and relevance in the scientific community. Known for its comprehensive reviews, the journal also goes by the names "Critical Reviews" and "Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health, Part B, Critical Reviews." The journal's mission is to provide a platform for in-depth analysis and critical discussion of the latest findings in toxicology, environmental health, and related disciplines. By doing so, it contributes to the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the complex interactions between environmental factors and human health, aiding in the development of strategies to protect and improve public health.
期刊最新文献
Neutrophils in toxicology: a forgotten field. Neuroendocrine contribution to sex-related variations in adverse air pollution health effects. Local and systemic effects of microplastic particles through cell damage, release of chemicals and drugs, dysbiosis, and interference with the absorption of nutrients. Incorporating new approach methods (NAMs) data in dose-response assessments: The future is now! In vitro models to evaluate multidrug resistance in cancer cells: Biochemical and morphological techniques and pharmacological strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1