成人在选择正畸矫治器时,影响审美要求的因素有哪些?]

Q4 Medicine L'' Orthodontie française Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1684/orthodfr.2021.46
Mélanie Gremeret, Vanessa Valran, Fabien Subtil, Sarah Gebeile-Chauty
{"title":"成人在选择正畸矫治器时,影响审美要求的因素有哪些?]","authors":"Mélanie Gremeret,&nbsp;Vanessa Valran,&nbsp;Fabien Subtil,&nbsp;Sarah Gebeile-Chauty","doi":"10.1684/orthodfr.2021.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although adult patients are said to be demanding in terms of discretion of the orthodontic appliance, the factors influencing the choice of the appliance are still poorly understood. The main objective of this study was to determine if there is a correlation, in adults, between the importance of the orthodontic treatment need and the aesthetic preference of the orthodontic appliance (metal braces, ceramic braces in buccal, lingual or aligner). The secondary objectives were to evaluate the impact of the patient's personal factors, his eventual orthodontic past and his perceived orthodontic need. Patients were interviewed by questionnaire before the first consultation. An index, depending of the discretion of the appliance, was used. The need for treatment was calculated via dental health component and aesthetic component of IOTN. Given the size of the sample, only trends can be emitted. The real need for treatment had no influence on the choice of the aesthetic appliance. The most demanding patients would be women, in their thirties, single, employed, executive or practicing a higher profession, with previous orthodontic treatment and having recently consulted an orthodontist, as an adult. These patients felt that their orthodontic treatment need was minimal or significant. Patients estimated the duration of treatment at 17 months. Lingual was considered the most aesthetic appliance far ahead of the aligners. A larger scale study is needed to determine the influence of each factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":35927,"journal":{"name":"L'' Orthodontie française","volume":"92 2","pages":"239-255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[What are the factors influencing the aesthetic requirement in the choice of orthodontic appliances in adults?]\",\"authors\":\"Mélanie Gremeret,&nbsp;Vanessa Valran,&nbsp;Fabien Subtil,&nbsp;Sarah Gebeile-Chauty\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/orthodfr.2021.46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although adult patients are said to be demanding in terms of discretion of the orthodontic appliance, the factors influencing the choice of the appliance are still poorly understood. The main objective of this study was to determine if there is a correlation, in adults, between the importance of the orthodontic treatment need and the aesthetic preference of the orthodontic appliance (metal braces, ceramic braces in buccal, lingual or aligner). The secondary objectives were to evaluate the impact of the patient's personal factors, his eventual orthodontic past and his perceived orthodontic need. Patients were interviewed by questionnaire before the first consultation. An index, depending of the discretion of the appliance, was used. The need for treatment was calculated via dental health component and aesthetic component of IOTN. Given the size of the sample, only trends can be emitted. The real need for treatment had no influence on the choice of the aesthetic appliance. The most demanding patients would be women, in their thirties, single, employed, executive or practicing a higher profession, with previous orthodontic treatment and having recently consulted an orthodontist, as an adult. These patients felt that their orthodontic treatment need was minimal or significant. Patients estimated the duration of treatment at 17 months. Lingual was considered the most aesthetic appliance far ahead of the aligners. A larger scale study is needed to determine the influence of each factor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"volume\":\"92 2\",\"pages\":\"239-255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2021.46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L'' Orthodontie française","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2021.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

虽然成人患者被认为对正畸矫治器的选择要求很高,但影响矫治器选择的因素仍然知之甚少。本研究的主要目的是确定在成人中,正畸治疗需求的重要性与正畸矫治器(金属牙套、陶瓷牙套、口腔牙套或矫正器)的审美偏好之间是否存在相关性。次要目的是评估患者个人因素的影响,他的最终正畸过去和他感知到的正畸需求。首次会诊前对患者进行问卷调查。一个指数,取决于器具的自由裁量权,被使用。通过IOTN的口腔健康成分和美学成分计算治疗需求。考虑到样本的大小,只能发出趋势。治疗的实际需要对美容器具的选择没有影响。要求最高的患者是女性,年龄在30多岁,单身,有工作,管理人员或从事更高的职业,以前接受过正畸治疗,最近咨询过正畸医生,作为成年人。这些患者认为他们的正畸治疗需求很小或很重要。患者估计治疗持续时间为17个月。语种被认为是最美观的器具,远远领先于牙齿矫正器。需要更大规模的研究来确定每个因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[What are the factors influencing the aesthetic requirement in the choice of orthodontic appliances in adults?]

Although adult patients are said to be demanding in terms of discretion of the orthodontic appliance, the factors influencing the choice of the appliance are still poorly understood. The main objective of this study was to determine if there is a correlation, in adults, between the importance of the orthodontic treatment need and the aesthetic preference of the orthodontic appliance (metal braces, ceramic braces in buccal, lingual or aligner). The secondary objectives were to evaluate the impact of the patient's personal factors, his eventual orthodontic past and his perceived orthodontic need. Patients were interviewed by questionnaire before the first consultation. An index, depending of the discretion of the appliance, was used. The need for treatment was calculated via dental health component and aesthetic component of IOTN. Given the size of the sample, only trends can be emitted. The real need for treatment had no influence on the choice of the aesthetic appliance. The most demanding patients would be women, in their thirties, single, employed, executive or practicing a higher profession, with previous orthodontic treatment and having recently consulted an orthodontist, as an adult. These patients felt that their orthodontic treatment need was minimal or significant. Patients estimated the duration of treatment at 17 months. Lingual was considered the most aesthetic appliance far ahead of the aligners. A larger scale study is needed to determine the influence of each factor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
L'' Orthodontie française
L'' Orthodontie française Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: L’Orthodontie Française, organe officiel de communication de la Société Française d’Orthopédie Dento-Faciale, est un journal scientifique de référence depuis 1921, de diffusion internationale, indexé à Medline et référencé à l’Index Medicus et à Bibliodent. Le journal a pour vocation d’accueillir les travaux des membres de la SFODF, des conférenciers ayant communiqué lors des congrès de la Société, ou de tout travail soumis à l’approbation de son comité de rédaction, traitant de l’orthopédie dento-faciale ou de tout sujet en rapport avec cette discipline.
期刊最新文献
Orofacial myofunctional reeducation assisted by a prefabricated reeducation appliance: towards a necessary paradigm shift The « patient casting »: a key decision in orthognathic surgery How to adapt orthodontic treatment for a patient with a general pathology? Review of the literature based on six scenarios that challenge the practitioner Simultaneous rehabilitation of the tongue and breathing: a physiological necessity Repousser les limites des possibilités de mise en place des canines incluses maxillaires ou mandibulaires avec le système simplifié CT8. Un entretien avec Daniel Chillès, Sylvia Riemenschneider-Chillès et Jean-Gabriel Chillès.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1