C57BL/6小鼠平衡木功能测试的心理测量学。

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Comparative medicine Pub Date : 2021-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-26 DOI:10.30802/AALAS-CM-21-000033
Melissa C Orenduff, Erika T Rezeli, Stephen D Hursting, Carl F Pieper
{"title":"C57BL/6小鼠平衡木功能测试的心理测量学。","authors":"Melissa C Orenduff,&nbsp;Erika T Rezeli,&nbsp;Stephen D Hursting,&nbsp;Carl F Pieper","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-CM-21-000033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aging is associated with a progressive decline in physical function characterized by decreased mobility, which is an important risk factor for loss of independence and reduced quality of life. Functional testing conducted in animals has advanced our understanding of age-related changes in physical ability and contributed to the development of physiologic measurements that can be used to assess functional changes during aging. The balance beam test is one assessment tool used to measure age-related changes in balance and coordination. The goal of this study is to provide analytical examples and psychometric support of a protocol that has been analyzed to show how the number of successive test runs, foot slips, pauses, and hesitations affect the reliability of the primary outcome measure, which is the time to cross the beam. Our results suggest that conducting more than 1 training session, consisting of greater than or equal to 3 successful training runs, followed by at least one test session with no less than 2 successful runs (that is, runs without pauses or hesitations) provides a psychometrically sound outcome. The data presented here indicate that a psychometric approach can improve protocol design and reliability of balance beam measures in mice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10659,"journal":{"name":"Comparative medicine","volume":"71 4","pages":"302-308"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8383997/pdf/cm2021000302.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometrics of the Balance Beam Functional Test in C57BL/6 Mice.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa C Orenduff,&nbsp;Erika T Rezeli,&nbsp;Stephen D Hursting,&nbsp;Carl F Pieper\",\"doi\":\"10.30802/AALAS-CM-21-000033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aging is associated with a progressive decline in physical function characterized by decreased mobility, which is an important risk factor for loss of independence and reduced quality of life. Functional testing conducted in animals has advanced our understanding of age-related changes in physical ability and contributed to the development of physiologic measurements that can be used to assess functional changes during aging. The balance beam test is one assessment tool used to measure age-related changes in balance and coordination. The goal of this study is to provide analytical examples and psychometric support of a protocol that has been analyzed to show how the number of successive test runs, foot slips, pauses, and hesitations affect the reliability of the primary outcome measure, which is the time to cross the beam. Our results suggest that conducting more than 1 training session, consisting of greater than or equal to 3 successful training runs, followed by at least one test session with no less than 2 successful runs (that is, runs without pauses or hesitations) provides a psychometrically sound outcome. The data presented here indicate that a psychometric approach can improve protocol design and reliability of balance beam measures in mice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative medicine\",\"volume\":\"71 4\",\"pages\":\"302-308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8383997/pdf/cm2021000302.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-CM-21-000033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-CM-21-000033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

衰老与身体功能的逐渐下降有关,其特征是活动能力下降,这是丧失独立性和生活质量下降的重要危险因素。在动物身上进行的功能测试提高了我们对与年龄相关的身体能力变化的理解,并有助于开发可用于评估衰老过程中功能变化的生理测量方法。平衡木测试是一种评估工具,用于测量与年龄相关的平衡和协调变化。本研究的目的是提供分析的例子和心理测量学的支持,该协议已被分析,以显示连续的测试运行,脚滑,暂停和犹豫的数量如何影响主要结果测量的可靠性,即穿越梁的时间。我们的研究结果表明,进行超过1次训练,包括大于或等于3次成功的训练,然后进行至少1次测试,其中不少于2次成功的跑步(即没有停顿或犹豫的跑步),可以提供心理测量学上的良好结果。本研究的数据表明,心理测量方法可以改善小鼠平衡木测量的方案设计和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometrics of the Balance Beam Functional Test in C57BL/6 Mice.

Aging is associated with a progressive decline in physical function characterized by decreased mobility, which is an important risk factor for loss of independence and reduced quality of life. Functional testing conducted in animals has advanced our understanding of age-related changes in physical ability and contributed to the development of physiologic measurements that can be used to assess functional changes during aging. The balance beam test is one assessment tool used to measure age-related changes in balance and coordination. The goal of this study is to provide analytical examples and psychometric support of a protocol that has been analyzed to show how the number of successive test runs, foot slips, pauses, and hesitations affect the reliability of the primary outcome measure, which is the time to cross the beam. Our results suggest that conducting more than 1 training session, consisting of greater than or equal to 3 successful training runs, followed by at least one test session with no less than 2 successful runs (that is, runs without pauses or hesitations) provides a psychometrically sound outcome. The data presented here indicate that a psychometric approach can improve protocol design and reliability of balance beam measures in mice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative medicine
Comparative medicine 医学-动物学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Comparative Medicine (CM), an international journal of comparative and experimental medicine, is the leading English-language publication in the field and is ranked by the Science Citation Index in the upper third of all scientific journals. The mission of CM is to disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed information that expands biomedical knowledge and promotes human and animal health through the study of laboratory animal disease, animal models of disease, and basic biologic mechanisms related to disease in people and animals.
期刊最新文献
Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Alpha-Hemolytic Streptococcus spp. from the Oral Cavity and Blood of Septicemic Periparturient Immunodeficient Mice. Polyomavirus-associated Disseminated T-cell Lymphoma in a Colony of Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Assessment of Risperidone Toxicity in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Embryos. Evaluation of Uveitis Induced in Rats by a Type I Collagen Peptide as a Model for Childhood Arthritis-associated Uveitis. Expression of Testis-specific Serine/Threonine Kinases during the Reproductive and Nonreproductive Seasons and Their Localization in Mature Spermatozoa of Tree Shrews (Tupaia belangeri).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1