骨质疏松症治疗趋势对骨折发生率的影响。

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Osteoporosis Pub Date : 2021-05-27 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/5517247
Akira Horikawa, Naohisa Miyakoshi, Michio Hongo, Yuji Kasukawa, Yoichi Shimada, Hiroyuki Kodama, Akihisa Sano
{"title":"骨质疏松症治疗趋势对骨折发生率的影响。","authors":"Akira Horikawa, Naohisa Miyakoshi, Michio Hongo, Yuji Kasukawa, Yoichi Shimada, Hiroyuki Kodama, Akihisa Sano","doi":"10.1155/2021/5517247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study focused on the trends in antiosteoporosis drug preferences and compared the incidence of fractures between patients treated orally and those who were exposed to an awareness campaign and assigned to intravenous/subcutaneous treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our hospital registry included 1,716 osteoporotic women who were over 65 years of age without preexisting vertebral and nonvertebral fractures over 1 year before this study, with bone mineral density (BMD) < -2.5 standard deviation (SD) and fracture assessment tool (FRAX) score > 20%, who were given 1,337 oral and 379 intravenous/subcutaneous prescriptions to treat their osteoporosis. Self-administered surveys (2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016) collected data on trends of preferences among nine drugs and fracture prevention using relative risk reduction (RRR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of patients taking oral prescriptions decreased gradually from 2012 to 2016, while the number of patients treated with intravenous and subcutaneous injections increased. The incidence of fracture was lower in patients receiving intravenous and subcutaneous injections than in patients taking oral medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate a decrease in oral prescriptions for osteoporosis treatment and that treatment for osteoporosis using intravenous or subcutaneous injections of antiosteoporosis drugs is more effective for preventing fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":45384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteoporosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Trends in Osteoporosis Treatment on the Incidence of Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Akira Horikawa, Naohisa Miyakoshi, Michio Hongo, Yuji Kasukawa, Yoichi Shimada, Hiroyuki Kodama, Akihisa Sano\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/5517247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study focused on the trends in antiosteoporosis drug preferences and compared the incidence of fractures between patients treated orally and those who were exposed to an awareness campaign and assigned to intravenous/subcutaneous treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our hospital registry included 1,716 osteoporotic women who were over 65 years of age without preexisting vertebral and nonvertebral fractures over 1 year before this study, with bone mineral density (BMD) < -2.5 standard deviation (SD) and fracture assessment tool (FRAX) score > 20%, who were given 1,337 oral and 379 intravenous/subcutaneous prescriptions to treat their osteoporosis. Self-administered surveys (2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016) collected data on trends of preferences among nine drugs and fracture prevention using relative risk reduction (RRR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of patients taking oral prescriptions decreased gradually from 2012 to 2016, while the number of patients treated with intravenous and subcutaneous injections increased. The incidence of fracture was lower in patients receiving intravenous and subcutaneous injections than in patients taking oral medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate a decrease in oral prescriptions for osteoporosis treatment and that treatment for osteoporosis using intravenous or subcutaneous injections of antiosteoporosis drugs is more effective for preventing fractures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osteoporosis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177999/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osteoporosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5517247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5517247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究关注抗骨质疏松症药物的选择趋势,并比较了口服治疗患者与接受宣传活动并被分配接受静脉注射/皮下注射治疗的患者的骨折发生率:本研究主要关注抗骨质疏松症药物的偏好趋势,并比较口服治疗患者与接受宣传活动并被分配接受静脉/皮下治疗的患者之间的骨折发生率:我们的医院登记处纳入了1716名65岁以上的骨质疏松症妇女,这些妇女在本研究前一年内未发生过椎体和非椎体骨折,骨矿密度(BMD)为20%,我们为她们开具了1337张口服处方和379张静脉注射/皮下注射处方来治疗骨质疏松症。自填式调查(2012 年、2013 年、2014 年、2015 年和 2016 年)收集了九种药物的偏好趋势以及使用相对风险降低率 (RRR) 预防骨折的数据:从2012年到2016年,服用口服处方药的患者人数逐渐减少,而接受静脉注射和皮下注射治疗的患者人数有所增加。接受静脉注射和皮下注射的患者骨折发生率低于口服药物的患者:这些研究结果表明,治疗骨质疏松症的口服处方有所减少,而使用静脉或皮下注射抗骨质疏松症药物治疗骨质疏松症对预防骨折更为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effects of Trends in Osteoporosis Treatment on the Incidence of Fractures.

Objective: This study focused on the trends in antiosteoporosis drug preferences and compared the incidence of fractures between patients treated orally and those who were exposed to an awareness campaign and assigned to intravenous/subcutaneous treatment.

Methods: Our hospital registry included 1,716 osteoporotic women who were over 65 years of age without preexisting vertebral and nonvertebral fractures over 1 year before this study, with bone mineral density (BMD) < -2.5 standard deviation (SD) and fracture assessment tool (FRAX) score > 20%, who were given 1,337 oral and 379 intravenous/subcutaneous prescriptions to treat their osteoporosis. Self-administered surveys (2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016) collected data on trends of preferences among nine drugs and fracture prevention using relative risk reduction (RRR).

Results: The number of patients taking oral prescriptions decreased gradually from 2012 to 2016, while the number of patients treated with intravenous and subcutaneous injections increased. The incidence of fracture was lower in patients receiving intravenous and subcutaneous injections than in patients taking oral medications.

Conclusion: These findings indicate a decrease in oral prescriptions for osteoporosis treatment and that treatment for osteoporosis using intravenous or subcutaneous injections of antiosteoporosis drugs is more effective for preventing fractures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Changes in Testing and Treatment Methods in Osteoporosis Care The Effects of Switch Therapy in Osteoporosis Treatment after Romosozumab after Comparing with Prior Treatment Quantitative MR Analysis of Changes in the Radius Bone Marrow in Osteoporosis. Skeletal Manifestations, Bone Pain, and BMD Changes in Albanian Type 1 Gaucher Patients Treated with Taliglucerase Alfa Osteoporosis Screening Disparities among Ethnic and Racial Minorities: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1