泰国版本的调查仪器的自然历史,病因学和髌股疼痛的流行:跨文化验证和测试-再测试信度

Wannaporn Sumranpat Brady , Yodchai Boonprakob , Thooptong Kwangsawad , Athawit Buahong , Pongthorn Asawaniwed , Nuttapong Khachornsaengcharoen , Michael Callaghan , James Selfe
{"title":"泰国版本的调查仪器的自然历史,病因学和髌股疼痛的流行:跨文化验证和测试-再测试信度","authors":"Wannaporn Sumranpat Brady ,&nbsp;Yodchai Boonprakob ,&nbsp;Thooptong Kwangsawad ,&nbsp;Athawit Buahong ,&nbsp;Pongthorn Asawaniwed ,&nbsp;Nuttapong Khachornsaengcharoen ,&nbsp;Michael Callaghan ,&nbsp;James Selfe","doi":"10.1016/j.asmart.2021.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>/objective: The Survey Instrument for Natural History, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral Pain (SNAPPS) is a self-report questionnaire which is a specifically designed measurement instrument to identify patellofemoral pain. It has reported high sensitivity, specificity and test-retest reliability to discriminate between people with knee pain, with or without patellofemoral pain. SNAPPS hasn't been studied in Thailand; therefore, the aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the questionnaire into Thai.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This study was separated into two phases: cross-cultural adaptation and test-retest reliability. The Survey Instrument for Natural History, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral Pain was translated into Thai following the guidelines for the cross cultural adaptation of self-report measures including six steps. Thirty four knee pain patients performed the test-retest reliability of the final version of this questionnaire. They were clinically diagnosed with patellofemoral pain by a physical therapist. They were asked to complete the questionnaire twice; with the 1st session and 2nd session having a 30 min break between. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC<sub>3, 1</sub>) method was used to determine test-retest reliability. The correlation of SNAPPS and VAS-U, VAS-W, VAS-S, VAS- J, VAS- R, and VAS- SQ were analyzed by Pearson correlation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The thirty-four participants (19 males, 15 females; with ages ranging 19–24 years) with patellofemoral pain were assessed twice with a 30 min break between the two sessions. The total scores of section 2 and 4 of the questionnaire indicated very strong test-retest reliability, ranging from 0.83 to 0.954 and the total score was ICC 0.91. Moreover, the Survey Instrument for Natural History, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral Pain had a correlation with intensity of pain during ascending and descending stairs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Thai version of the Survey Instrument for Natural History, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral Pain can be used to assess patellofemoral pain in young Thai patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44283,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.asmart.2021.05.005","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thai version of the Survey Instrument for Natural History, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral Pain: Cross-cultural validation and test-retest reliability\",\"authors\":\"Wannaporn Sumranpat Brady ,&nbsp;Yodchai Boonprakob ,&nbsp;Thooptong Kwangsawad ,&nbsp;Athawit Buahong ,&nbsp;Pongthorn Asawaniwed ,&nbsp;Nuttapong Khachornsaengcharoen ,&nbsp;Michael Callaghan ,&nbsp;James Selfe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asmart.2021.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>/objective: The Survey Instrument for Natural History, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral Pain (SNAPPS) is a self-report questionnaire which is a specifically designed measurement instrument to identify patellofemoral pain. It has reported high sensitivity, specificity and test-retest reliability to discriminate between people with knee pain, with or without patellofemoral pain. SNAPPS hasn't been studied in Thailand; therefore, the aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the questionnaire into Thai.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This study was separated into two phases: cross-cultural adaptation and test-retest reliability. The Survey Instrument for Natural History, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral Pain was translated into Thai following the guidelines for the cross cultural adaptation of self-report measures including six steps. Thirty four knee pain patients performed the test-retest reliability of the final version of this questionnaire. They were clinically diagnosed with patellofemoral pain by a physical therapist. They were asked to complete the questionnaire twice; with the 1st session and 2nd session having a 30 min break between. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC<sub>3, 1</sub>) method was used to determine test-retest reliability. The correlation of SNAPPS and VAS-U, VAS-W, VAS-S, VAS- J, VAS- R, and VAS- SQ were analyzed by Pearson correlation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The thirty-four participants (19 males, 15 females; with ages ranging 19–24 years) with patellofemoral pain were assessed twice with a 30 min break between the two sessions. The total scores of section 2 and 4 of the questionnaire indicated very strong test-retest reliability, ranging from 0.83 to 0.954 and the total score was ICC 0.91. Moreover, the Survey Instrument for Natural History, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral Pain had a correlation with intensity of pain during ascending and descending stairs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Thai version of the Survey Instrument for Natural History, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral Pain can be used to assess patellofemoral pain in young Thai patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.asmart.2021.05.005\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214687321000133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214687321000133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景/目的:髌骨疼痛的自然病史、病因学和患病率调查工具(SNAPPS)是一种自我报告问卷,是一种专门设计的髌骨疼痛测量工具。据报道,该方法具有较高的敏感性、特异性和重测可靠性,可用于区分有或无髌骨疼痛的膝关节疼痛患者。snap还没有在泰国进行过研究;因此,本研究的目的是跨文化调整问卷到泰国。方法本研究分为跨文化适应和重测信度两个阶段。《髌骨疼痛的自然史、病因学和患病率调查工具》被翻译成泰语,遵循自我报告措施跨文化适应指南,包括六个步骤。34例膝关节疼痛患者对终版问卷进行了重测信度。他们被物理治疗师临床诊断为髌骨痛。他们被要求完成两次调查问卷;第一节和第二节之间有30分钟的休息时间。采用类内相关系数(ICC3, 1)法确定重测信度。采用Pearson相关分析snap与VAS- u、VAS- w、VAS- s、VAS- J、VAS- R、VAS- SQ的相关性。结果34例受试者(男19例,女15例;年龄19-24岁的髌骨痛患者进行两次评估,两次评估之间间隔30分钟。问卷第2节和第4节的总分具有非常强的重测信度,在0.83 ~ 0.954之间,总分ICC为0.91。此外,髌骨疼痛的自然史、病因学和患病率调查仪器与上下楼梯时的疼痛强度相关。结论泰国版《髌骨疼痛的自然史、病因学和患病率调查仪器》可用于评估泰国年轻患者的髌骨疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thai version of the Survey Instrument for Natural History, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral Pain: Cross-cultural validation and test-retest reliability

Background

/objective: The Survey Instrument for Natural History, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral Pain (SNAPPS) is a self-report questionnaire which is a specifically designed measurement instrument to identify patellofemoral pain. It has reported high sensitivity, specificity and test-retest reliability to discriminate between people with knee pain, with or without patellofemoral pain. SNAPPS hasn't been studied in Thailand; therefore, the aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the questionnaire into Thai.

Method

This study was separated into two phases: cross-cultural adaptation and test-retest reliability. The Survey Instrument for Natural History, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral Pain was translated into Thai following the guidelines for the cross cultural adaptation of self-report measures including six steps. Thirty four knee pain patients performed the test-retest reliability of the final version of this questionnaire. They were clinically diagnosed with patellofemoral pain by a physical therapist. They were asked to complete the questionnaire twice; with the 1st session and 2nd session having a 30 min break between. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC3, 1) method was used to determine test-retest reliability. The correlation of SNAPPS and VAS-U, VAS-W, VAS-S, VAS- J, VAS- R, and VAS- SQ were analyzed by Pearson correlation.

Results

The thirty-four participants (19 males, 15 females; with ages ranging 19–24 years) with patellofemoral pain were assessed twice with a 30 min break between the two sessions. The total scores of section 2 and 4 of the questionnaire indicated very strong test-retest reliability, ranging from 0.83 to 0.954 and the total score was ICC 0.91. Moreover, the Survey Instrument for Natural History, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral Pain had a correlation with intensity of pain during ascending and descending stairs.

Conclusion

The Thai version of the Survey Instrument for Natural History, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral Pain can be used to assess patellofemoral pain in young Thai patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology (AP-SMART) is the official peer-reviewed, open access journal of the Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society (APKASS) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Society of Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine (JOSKAS). It is published quarterly, in January, April, July and October, by Elsevier. The mission of AP-SMART is to inspire clinicians, practitioners, scientists and engineers to work towards a common goal to improve quality of life in the international community. The Journal publishes original research, reviews, editorials, perspectives, and letters to the Editor. Multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines will be the trend in the coming decades. AP-SMART provides a platform for the exchange of new clinical and scientific information in the most precise and expeditious way to achieve timely dissemination of information and cross-fertilization of ideas.
期刊最新文献
Factors affecting the therapeutic effects of multiple intra-articular injections of platelet-rich-plasma for knee osteoarthritis Early intervention of extracorporeal shockwave therapy sustained positive long-term effect on rotator cuff healing: A randomized controlled trial with 3-year follow-up The residual laxity of medial collateral ligament after magic point pie crusting MCL released in arthroscopic management of medial meniscus Fast rehabilitation does not worsen clinical, radiological, and arthroscopic outcomes after medial meniscus posterior root repair: A retrospective comparative study ACL injury characteristics in badminton : A registry study with prospectively collected data on sports related epidemiology and injury mechanism of 539 badminton players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1