瘙痒严重程度量表-一种评估烧伤患者瘙痒的新工具。

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2021-06-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01
Suzanne M Beecher, Ronan Hill, Laura Kearney, Jemima Dorairaj, Arun Kumar, Anthony James Clover
{"title":"瘙痒严重程度量表-一种评估烧伤患者瘙痒的新工具。","authors":"Suzanne M Beecher,&nbsp;Ronan Hill,&nbsp;Laura Kearney,&nbsp;Jemima Dorairaj,&nbsp;Arun Kumar,&nbsp;Anthony James Clover","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pruritus assessment is difficult due to the varying subjective nature of the experience. There have been several validated tools described to quantify the severity of itch, however these tools fail to provide a comprehensive assessment or are too cumbersome and therefore lack usability. Our novel burn assessment tool, <i>\"The Pruritus Severity Scale\"</i> (PSS) allows for accurate quantification of itch components. The aim of this study was to assess its use in the burns population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted on all patients over five years of age with a burn injury over a six month period. Patients underwent subjective evaluation of their itch as determined by two validated scores, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Itch Man scale (IMS) and in addition to the PSS. The pruritus severity scale was correlated with the previously validated scoring methods using bi-variate correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were included in the study. The most common cause of injury was due to flame burn. The mean total body surface area was 6.5% (range: 1-26%). Both the IMS and the VAS positively correlated well with the PSS. The Spearman Coefficient for the PSS vs IMS was 0.81, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.65 (P<0.05). The Spearman Coefficient for the PSS vs VAS was 0.87 (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.76 (P<0.01)). There is a positive linear relationship between our novel scoring methods and the currently validated methods, indicating its validity as a burn assessment too.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Pruritus Severity Scale was shown to be an accurate, objective tool that was able to effectively record the patient's experience of itch. We believe that this novel score is quick, easy to use and allows for more comprehensive assessment than other short assessment tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8310874/pdf/ijbt0011-0156.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The pruritus severity scale-a novel tool to assess itch in burns patients.\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne M Beecher,&nbsp;Ronan Hill,&nbsp;Laura Kearney,&nbsp;Jemima Dorairaj,&nbsp;Arun Kumar,&nbsp;Anthony James Clover\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pruritus assessment is difficult due to the varying subjective nature of the experience. There have been several validated tools described to quantify the severity of itch, however these tools fail to provide a comprehensive assessment or are too cumbersome and therefore lack usability. Our novel burn assessment tool, <i>\\\"The Pruritus Severity Scale\\\"</i> (PSS) allows for accurate quantification of itch components. The aim of this study was to assess its use in the burns population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted on all patients over five years of age with a burn injury over a six month period. Patients underwent subjective evaluation of their itch as determined by two validated scores, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Itch Man scale (IMS) and in addition to the PSS. The pruritus severity scale was correlated with the previously validated scoring methods using bi-variate correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were included in the study. The most common cause of injury was due to flame burn. The mean total body surface area was 6.5% (range: 1-26%). Both the IMS and the VAS positively correlated well with the PSS. The Spearman Coefficient for the PSS vs IMS was 0.81, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.65 (P<0.05). The Spearman Coefficient for the PSS vs VAS was 0.87 (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.76 (P<0.01)). There is a positive linear relationship between our novel scoring methods and the currently validated methods, indicating its validity as a burn assessment too.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Pruritus Severity Scale was shown to be an accurate, objective tool that was able to effectively record the patient's experience of itch. We believe that this novel score is quick, easy to use and allows for more comprehensive assessment than other short assessment tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8310874/pdf/ijbt0011-0156.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:瘙痒症的评估是困难的,由于不同的主观性质的经验。已经有几个经过验证的工具来量化瘙痒的严重程度,但是这些工具无法提供全面的评估,或者过于繁琐,因此缺乏可用性。我们的新烧伤评估工具,“瘙痒严重程度量表”(PSS)允许准确量化瘙痒成分。本研究的目的是评估其在烧伤人群中的应用。方法:一项前瞻性观察研究对所有5岁以上的烧伤患者进行了为期6个月的研究。患者通过视觉模拟量表(Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)和瘙痒人量表(itch Man Scale, IMS)以及PSS两种经过验证的评分对其瘙痒进行主观评估。瘙痒严重程度量表使用双变量相关性与先前验证的评分方法相关。结果:22例患者纳入研究。最常见的伤害原因是由于火焰烧伤。平均体表面积为6.5%(范围:1-26%)。IMS和VAS均与PSS呈正相关。PSS与IMS的Spearman系数为0.81,R2 = 0.65 (P2 = 0.76)。结论:瘙痒严重程度量表是一种准确、客观的工具,能够有效地记录患者的瘙痒体验。我们相信,这种新颖的分数是快速,易于使用,并允许更全面的评估比其他简短的评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The pruritus severity scale-a novel tool to assess itch in burns patients.

Background: Pruritus assessment is difficult due to the varying subjective nature of the experience. There have been several validated tools described to quantify the severity of itch, however these tools fail to provide a comprehensive assessment or are too cumbersome and therefore lack usability. Our novel burn assessment tool, "The Pruritus Severity Scale" (PSS) allows for accurate quantification of itch components. The aim of this study was to assess its use in the burns population.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on all patients over five years of age with a burn injury over a six month period. Patients underwent subjective evaluation of their itch as determined by two validated scores, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Itch Man scale (IMS) and in addition to the PSS. The pruritus severity scale was correlated with the previously validated scoring methods using bi-variate correlations.

Results: Twenty-two patients were included in the study. The most common cause of injury was due to flame burn. The mean total body surface area was 6.5% (range: 1-26%). Both the IMS and the VAS positively correlated well with the PSS. The Spearman Coefficient for the PSS vs IMS was 0.81, R2 = 0.65 (P<0.05). The Spearman Coefficient for the PSS vs VAS was 0.87 (R2 = 0.76 (P<0.01)). There is a positive linear relationship between our novel scoring methods and the currently validated methods, indicating its validity as a burn assessment too.

Conclusion: The Pruritus Severity Scale was shown to be an accurate, objective tool that was able to effectively record the patient's experience of itch. We believe that this novel score is quick, easy to use and allows for more comprehensive assessment than other short assessment tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of an enteral nutrition protocol in critically ill patients with burn injuries. Management of post-traumatic ankle deformities in children. Frostbite secondary to antimycobacterial-induced peripheral neuropathy: a case report. Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma for skin graft preservation: an experimental comparative study. Does early stable fixation reduce complications in paediatric femoral neck fractures?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1