择期气管切开术在头颈部肿瘤手术中的标准比较。

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Polish Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2021-05-05 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0014.8690
Filip Kissin, Maciej Rysz, Magdalena Budziszewska, Romuald Krajewski
{"title":"择期气管切开术在头颈部肿瘤手术中的标准比较。","authors":"Filip Kissin,&nbsp;Maciej Rysz,&nbsp;Magdalena Budziszewska,&nbsp;Romuald Krajewski","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0014.8690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Elective tracheostomy before resection of a malignancy in head and neck region assures unobstructed ventilation during postoperative period but is associated with an increased risk of complications. We aimed to evaluate retrospectively, how application of elective tracheostomy scales would influence frequency of tracheostomy in comparison with preoperative clinical judgement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 205 patients operated from 2013 till 2017 resection of a malignancy involved suprahyoid or pharyngeal muscles, neck dissection and flap reconstruction. Elective tracheostomy decision was made on clinical basis. Score for each patient in 3 published scales has been calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study group 76 patients had an elective tracheostomy at the outset of a resection procedure. Among 129 patients without elective tracheostomy 9 had a tracheostomy in postoperative period. Indications for elective tracheostomy were calculated for scale I, II and III. Only in 120 patients the decision to perform elective tracheostomy or not would be identical in each scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that decisions to perform an elective tracheostomy based on the 3 scales has low specificity. The factors used in the published scales should be evaluated in a prospective multicenter study.</p>","PeriodicalId":42608,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"75 4","pages":"20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of criteria for elective tracheostomy in head and neck cancer surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Filip Kissin,&nbsp;Maciej Rysz,&nbsp;Magdalena Budziszewska,&nbsp;Romuald Krajewski\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0014.8690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Elective tracheostomy before resection of a malignancy in head and neck region assures unobstructed ventilation during postoperative period but is associated with an increased risk of complications. We aimed to evaluate retrospectively, how application of elective tracheostomy scales would influence frequency of tracheostomy in comparison with preoperative clinical judgement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 205 patients operated from 2013 till 2017 resection of a malignancy involved suprahyoid or pharyngeal muscles, neck dissection and flap reconstruction. Elective tracheostomy decision was made on clinical basis. Score for each patient in 3 published scales has been calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study group 76 patients had an elective tracheostomy at the outset of a resection procedure. Among 129 patients without elective tracheostomy 9 had a tracheostomy in postoperative period. Indications for elective tracheostomy were calculated for scale I, II and III. Only in 120 patients the decision to perform elective tracheostomy or not would be identical in each scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that decisions to perform an elective tracheostomy based on the 3 scales has low specificity. The factors used in the published scales should be evaluated in a prospective multicenter study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"75 4\",\"pages\":\"20-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.8690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.8690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:头颈部恶性肿瘤切除术前择期气管造口术可确保术后通气通畅,但并发症风险增加。我们的目的是回顾性评价择期气管造瘘量表的应用与术前临床判断相比对气管造瘘频率的影响。方法:对2013年至2017年205例累及舌骨上肌或咽肌的恶性肿瘤进行切除、颈部清扫和皮瓣重建。择期气管切开术是根据临床情况决定的。在3个已公布的量表中计算每位患者的评分。结果:在研究组中,76例患者在切除手术开始时进行了择期气管切开术。129例未择期气管切开术患者中,术后行气管切开术者9例。择期气管切开术指征按量表I、II、III进行计算。只有120例患者的择期气管切开术的决定在每个量表上是相同的。结论:我们的研究结果表明,基于这3个量表决定择期气管切开术的特异性较低。已发表的量表中使用的因素应在前瞻性多中心研究中进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of criteria for elective tracheostomy in head and neck cancer surgery.

Objectives: Elective tracheostomy before resection of a malignancy in head and neck region assures unobstructed ventilation during postoperative period but is associated with an increased risk of complications. We aimed to evaluate retrospectively, how application of elective tracheostomy scales would influence frequency of tracheostomy in comparison with preoperative clinical judgement.

Methods: In 205 patients operated from 2013 till 2017 resection of a malignancy involved suprahyoid or pharyngeal muscles, neck dissection and flap reconstruction. Elective tracheostomy decision was made on clinical basis. Score for each patient in 3 published scales has been calculated.

Results: In the study group 76 patients had an elective tracheostomy at the outset of a resection procedure. Among 129 patients without elective tracheostomy 9 had a tracheostomy in postoperative period. Indications for elective tracheostomy were calculated for scale I, II and III. Only in 120 patients the decision to perform elective tracheostomy or not would be identical in each scale.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that decisions to perform an elective tracheostomy based on the 3 scales has low specificity. The factors used in the published scales should be evaluated in a prospective multicenter study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Otolaryngology
Polish Journal of Otolaryngology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
The impact of using FM systems on phonemic awareness in children with central auditory processing disorders (APD). Patient Satisfaction after Open Rhinoseptoplasty: What Do the Statistics Say? Preoperative serum 25(OH)D status and its correlation with an early endoscopic sinus surgery outcome and chronic rhinosinusitis severity. Revision parotidectomy - analysis of indications for the procedure and treatment results based on 10 years of follow-up in a single center. Rostral fluid shifts and other mechanisms of interaction between obstructive sleep apnea and heart failure - a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1