利格列汀转替尼格列汀对晚期糖尿病肾病患者血糖控制和肾功能无显著影响

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pragmatic and Observational Research Pub Date : 2021-08-06 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/POR.S314409
Keiji Hirai, Hiroaki Nonaka, Moeka Ueda, Junki Morino, Shohei Kaneko, Saori Minato, Yuko Mutsuyoshi, Katsunori Yanai, Hiroki Ishii, Momoko Matsuyama, Taisuke Kitano, Akinori Aomatsu, Haruhisa Miyazawa, Kiyonori Ito, Yuichiro Ueda, Susumu Ookawara, Yoshiyuki Morishita
{"title":"利格列汀转替尼格列汀对晚期糖尿病肾病患者血糖控制和肾功能无显著影响","authors":"Keiji Hirai,&nbsp;Hiroaki Nonaka,&nbsp;Moeka Ueda,&nbsp;Junki Morino,&nbsp;Shohei Kaneko,&nbsp;Saori Minato,&nbsp;Yuko Mutsuyoshi,&nbsp;Katsunori Yanai,&nbsp;Hiroki Ishii,&nbsp;Momoko Matsuyama,&nbsp;Taisuke Kitano,&nbsp;Akinori Aomatsu,&nbsp;Haruhisa Miyazawa,&nbsp;Kiyonori Ito,&nbsp;Yuichiro Ueda,&nbsp;Susumu Ookawara,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Morishita","doi":"10.2147/POR.S314409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We compared the efficacy of teneligliptin versus linagliptin for glycemic control and renoprotection in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Changes in the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose concentration, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during a 12-month period were retrospectively analyzed after switching from linagliptin to teneligliptin in 13 patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease (teneligliptin group). Thirteen propensity score-matched patients who were treated with linagliptin alone served as controls (linagliptin group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HbA1c, fasting blood glucose concentration, and UACR did not change during the 12-month study period in either group. The annual change rate in the eGFR did not differ between before and after baseline in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Switching from linagliptin to teneligliptin may not improve glycemic control, reduce urinary protein excretion, or ameliorate the rate of renal function decline in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease. These results suggest that teneligliptin may not be more advantageous for glycemic control and renoprotection compared with linagliptin in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/89/2e/por-12-81.PMC8354772.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Significant Changes of Glycemic Control and Renal Function in Patients with Advanced-Stage Diabetic Kidney Disease by Switching from Linagliptin to Teneligliptin.\",\"authors\":\"Keiji Hirai,&nbsp;Hiroaki Nonaka,&nbsp;Moeka Ueda,&nbsp;Junki Morino,&nbsp;Shohei Kaneko,&nbsp;Saori Minato,&nbsp;Yuko Mutsuyoshi,&nbsp;Katsunori Yanai,&nbsp;Hiroki Ishii,&nbsp;Momoko Matsuyama,&nbsp;Taisuke Kitano,&nbsp;Akinori Aomatsu,&nbsp;Haruhisa Miyazawa,&nbsp;Kiyonori Ito,&nbsp;Yuichiro Ueda,&nbsp;Susumu Ookawara,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Morishita\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/POR.S314409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We compared the efficacy of teneligliptin versus linagliptin for glycemic control and renoprotection in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Changes in the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose concentration, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during a 12-month period were retrospectively analyzed after switching from linagliptin to teneligliptin in 13 patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease (teneligliptin group). Thirteen propensity score-matched patients who were treated with linagliptin alone served as controls (linagliptin group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HbA1c, fasting blood glucose concentration, and UACR did not change during the 12-month study period in either group. The annual change rate in the eGFR did not differ between before and after baseline in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Switching from linagliptin to teneligliptin may not improve glycemic control, reduce urinary protein excretion, or ameliorate the rate of renal function decline in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease. These results suggest that teneligliptin may not be more advantageous for glycemic control and renoprotection compared with linagliptin in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatic and Observational Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/89/2e/por-12-81.PMC8354772.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatic and Observational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S314409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S314409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较替尼格列汀与利格列汀对晚期糖尿病肾病患者血糖控制和肾保护的疗效。患者和方法:回顾性分析13例晚期糖尿病肾病患者(替尼格列汀组)从利格列汀转为替尼格列汀后12个月期间糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹血糖浓度、尿白蛋白/肌酐比(UACR)和肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的变化。13名倾向评分匹配的患者单独接受利格列汀治疗作为对照组(利格列汀组)。结果:在12个月的研究期间,两组患者的HbA1c、空腹血糖浓度和UACR均未发生变化。在两组中,eGFR的年变化率在基线前后没有差异。结论:从利格列汀切换到替尼格列汀可能不会改善晚期糖尿病肾病患者的血糖控制,减少尿蛋白排泄,或改善肾功能下降的速度。这些结果表明,与利格列汀相比,替尼格列汀在晚期糖尿病肾病患者的血糖控制和肾保护方面可能并不更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
No Significant Changes of Glycemic Control and Renal Function in Patients with Advanced-Stage Diabetic Kidney Disease by Switching from Linagliptin to Teneligliptin.

Purpose: We compared the efficacy of teneligliptin versus linagliptin for glycemic control and renoprotection in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease.

Patients and methods: Changes in the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose concentration, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during a 12-month period were retrospectively analyzed after switching from linagliptin to teneligliptin in 13 patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease (teneligliptin group). Thirteen propensity score-matched patients who were treated with linagliptin alone served as controls (linagliptin group).

Results: The HbA1c, fasting blood glucose concentration, and UACR did not change during the 12-month study period in either group. The annual change rate in the eGFR did not differ between before and after baseline in either group.

Conclusion: Switching from linagliptin to teneligliptin may not improve glycemic control, reduce urinary protein excretion, or ameliorate the rate of renal function decline in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease. These results suggest that teneligliptin may not be more advantageous for glycemic control and renoprotection compared with linagliptin in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
Pragmatic and Observational Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
UK Electronic Healthcare Records for Research: A Scientometric Analysis of Respiratory, Cardiovascular, and COVID-19 Publications. A Real-World Study on the Short-Term Efficacy of Amlodipine in Treating Hypertension Among Inpatients. Therapeutic Advances in Obesity: How Real-World Evidence Impacts Affordability Beyond Standard of Care. Quality of Life in Patients Affected by Facial Basal Cell Carcinoma: Prospective Longitudinal Pilot Study and Validation of Skin Cancer Index in Lithuanian Language. Advanced Multi-Layer Watertight Closure versus Conventional Closure in Total Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1