阿那白对系统性幼年特发性关节炎(sJIA)治疗策略的经济比较

IF 1.7 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2021-09-10 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OARRR.S325400
Ash Bullement, Emma S Knowles, Merel Langenfeld, Gil Reynolds Diogo, Jameel Nazir, Daniel Eriksson
{"title":"阿那白对系统性幼年特发性关节炎(sJIA)治疗策略的经济比较","authors":"Ash Bullement,&nbsp;Emma S Knowles,&nbsp;Merel Langenfeld,&nbsp;Gil Reynolds Diogo,&nbsp;Jameel Nazir,&nbsp;Daniel Eriksson","doi":"10.2147/OARRR.S325400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a rare, complex autoinflammatory disease with substantial morbidity, often characterized by fever, rash, and muscle pain, amongst other symptoms. Biologic agents, such as anakinra, have been successfully used to treat patients internationally, but their usage in some regions is limited to patients that have failed to achieve clinically inactive disease with corticosteroids and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Use of anakinra early in the disease course leads to better clinical outcomes; however, longer-term costs for this treatment strategy have not been established. This study compares the economic implications of first-line versus later-line availability of anakinra for patients with sJIA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for patients treated with first-line anakinra were identified from a single-center, prospective study and compared to a combination of published trial and economic evaluation information to facilitate a comparison to later-line anakinra (ie, following corticosteroids + csDMARDs). Costs were estimated for product acquisition and medical resource utilization (MRU), including planned outpatient visits and unplanned hospital admissions. Total costs over a 5-year horizon were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 5-year product acquisition cost for the first-line anakinra strategy was €24,021, and for later-line anakinra was €20,471. The corresponding MRU costs were €19,197 (first-line) versus €25,425 (later-line). Overall 5-year costs (product acquisition and MRU) were lower for the first-line strategy (€43,218 versus €45,896).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of anakinra for patients with sJIA in the first-line setting is efficacious to induce and sustain inactive disease, and the findings of this study show that this treatment strategy leads to cost savings through reduced medical expenditure.</p>","PeriodicalId":45545,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews","volume":"13 ","pages":"257-266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/fa/oarrr-13-257.PMC8439981.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Economic Comparison of Treatment Strategies with Anakinra in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA).\",\"authors\":\"Ash Bullement,&nbsp;Emma S Knowles,&nbsp;Merel Langenfeld,&nbsp;Gil Reynolds Diogo,&nbsp;Jameel Nazir,&nbsp;Daniel Eriksson\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OARRR.S325400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a rare, complex autoinflammatory disease with substantial morbidity, often characterized by fever, rash, and muscle pain, amongst other symptoms. Biologic agents, such as anakinra, have been successfully used to treat patients internationally, but their usage in some regions is limited to patients that have failed to achieve clinically inactive disease with corticosteroids and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Use of anakinra early in the disease course leads to better clinical outcomes; however, longer-term costs for this treatment strategy have not been established. This study compares the economic implications of first-line versus later-line availability of anakinra for patients with sJIA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for patients treated with first-line anakinra were identified from a single-center, prospective study and compared to a combination of published trial and economic evaluation information to facilitate a comparison to later-line anakinra (ie, following corticosteroids + csDMARDs). Costs were estimated for product acquisition and medical resource utilization (MRU), including planned outpatient visits and unplanned hospital admissions. Total costs over a 5-year horizon were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 5-year product acquisition cost for the first-line anakinra strategy was €24,021, and for later-line anakinra was €20,471. The corresponding MRU costs were €19,197 (first-line) versus €25,425 (later-line). Overall 5-year costs (product acquisition and MRU) were lower for the first-line strategy (€43,218 versus €45,896).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of anakinra for patients with sJIA in the first-line setting is efficacious to induce and sustain inactive disease, and the findings of this study show that this treatment strategy leads to cost savings through reduced medical expenditure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"257-266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/fa/oarrr-13-257.PMC8439981.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S325400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S325400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

系统性青少年特发性关节炎(sJIA)是一种罕见的、复杂的自身炎症性疾病,发病率很高,通常以发热、皮疹和肌肉疼痛等症状为特征。生物制剂,如anakinra,已在国际上成功地用于治疗患者,但在一些地区,它们的使用仅限于使用皮质类固醇和传统的合成疾病缓解抗风湿药物(csDMARDs)未能实现临床非活动性疾病的患者。在病程早期使用阿那白可以获得更好的临床结果;然而,这种治疗策略的长期费用尚未确定。本研究比较了阿那那对sJIA患者一线和后期可用性的经济影响。方法:从一项单中心前瞻性研究中确定一线阿那白拉治疗的患者数据,并与已发表的试验和经济评估信息相结合进行比较,以便与后期线阿那白拉(即皮质类固醇+ csDMARDs)进行比较。估计了产品购置和医疗资源利用(MRU)的成本,包括计划的门诊就诊和计划外住院。比较了5年期间的总成本。结果:一线阿那金策略的5年总产品获取成本为24,021欧元,二线阿那金策略的5年总产品获取成本为20,471欧元。相应的MRU成本为19,197欧元(一线)和25,425欧元(二线)。一线战略的总体5年成本(产品获取和MRU)较低(43,218欧元,而不是45,896欧元)。结论:anakinra用于一线sJIA患者可有效诱导和维持非活动性疾病,本研究结果表明,该治疗策略可通过减少医疗支出来节省成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Economic Comparison of Treatment Strategies with Anakinra in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA).

Introduction: Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a rare, complex autoinflammatory disease with substantial morbidity, often characterized by fever, rash, and muscle pain, amongst other symptoms. Biologic agents, such as anakinra, have been successfully used to treat patients internationally, but their usage in some regions is limited to patients that have failed to achieve clinically inactive disease with corticosteroids and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Use of anakinra early in the disease course leads to better clinical outcomes; however, longer-term costs for this treatment strategy have not been established. This study compares the economic implications of first-line versus later-line availability of anakinra for patients with sJIA.

Methods: Data for patients treated with first-line anakinra were identified from a single-center, prospective study and compared to a combination of published trial and economic evaluation information to facilitate a comparison to later-line anakinra (ie, following corticosteroids + csDMARDs). Costs were estimated for product acquisition and medical resource utilization (MRU), including planned outpatient visits and unplanned hospital admissions. Total costs over a 5-year horizon were compared.

Results: Total 5-year product acquisition cost for the first-line anakinra strategy was €24,021, and for later-line anakinra was €20,471. The corresponding MRU costs were €19,197 (first-line) versus €25,425 (later-line). Overall 5-year costs (product acquisition and MRU) were lower for the first-line strategy (€43,218 versus €45,896).

Conclusion: The use of anakinra for patients with sJIA in the first-line setting is efficacious to induce and sustain inactive disease, and the findings of this study show that this treatment strategy leads to cost savings through reduced medical expenditure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Safety of Tocilizumab on Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease. Tofacitinib Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Clinical Trials and Real-World Data Contextualization of Patients, Efficacy, and Treatment Retention. Cold Air Plasma Inhibiting Tumor-Like Biological Behavior of Rheumatoid Arthritis Fibroblast-Like Synovial Cells via G2/M Cell Cycle Arrest. JAK-Inhibitors - A Story of Success and Adverse Events. Adverse Impact of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Saudi Arabia Retrospective Multi-Center Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1