公众参与参与式研究:来自罗姆人、吉普赛人和游民社区的同伴访谈者的经验。

IF 1 Q3 NURSING Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2022-03-10 Epub Date: 2022-02-03 DOI:10.7748/nr.2022.e1818
Louise Condon, Jolana Curejova, Donna Leeanne Morgan, Glenn Miles, Denise Barry, Deborah Fenlon
{"title":"公众参与参与式研究:来自罗姆人、吉普赛人和游民社区的同伴访谈者的经验。","authors":"Louise Condon, Jolana Curejova, Donna Leeanne Morgan, Glenn Miles, Denise Barry, Deborah Fenlon","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A vital component of research is patient and public involvement (PPI). The challenges of PPI increase when conducting cross-cultural research into sensitive subjects with marginalised ethnic minority groups.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To present the authors' reflections on conducting peer interviews with members of Roma, Gypsy and Traveller communities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The authors provide examples of reflections on collecting data from a participatory research project that explored Gypsies, Roma and Travellers' experiences of cancer in their communities. They derived the reflections from audio-recorded, post-interview debriefs with co-researchers from the same ethnic backgrounds as interviewees ('peer researchers'). The main challenges for the peer researchers were cultural, linguistic and pragmatic, all fundamentally related to exploring a sensitive health topic through the lens of ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Peer researchers recognised their role in building bridges between participants and the research team. They did this by establishing a relationship of trust, minimising distress, representing the views of their communities and obtaining data to meet the aims of the project. Peer researchers perform multiple roles to assist in cross-cultural data collection in participatory research.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>This article highlights underexplored aspects of peer researchers' work that have implications for the planning and conduct of cross-cultural research with marginalised groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public involvement in participatory research: the experiences of peer interviewers from Roma, Gypsy and Traveller communities.\",\"authors\":\"Louise Condon, Jolana Curejova, Donna Leeanne Morgan, Glenn Miles, Denise Barry, Deborah Fenlon\",\"doi\":\"10.7748/nr.2022.e1818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A vital component of research is patient and public involvement (PPI). The challenges of PPI increase when conducting cross-cultural research into sensitive subjects with marginalised ethnic minority groups.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To present the authors' reflections on conducting peer interviews with members of Roma, Gypsy and Traveller communities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The authors provide examples of reflections on collecting data from a participatory research project that explored Gypsies, Roma and Travellers' experiences of cancer in their communities. They derived the reflections from audio-recorded, post-interview debriefs with co-researchers from the same ethnic backgrounds as interviewees ('peer researchers'). The main challenges for the peer researchers were cultural, linguistic and pragmatic, all fundamentally related to exploring a sensitive health topic through the lens of ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Peer researchers recognised their role in building bridges between participants and the research team. They did this by establishing a relationship of trust, minimising distress, representing the views of their communities and obtaining data to meet the aims of the project. Peer researchers perform multiple roles to assist in cross-cultural data collection in participatory research.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>This article highlights underexplored aspects of peer researchers' work that have implications for the planning and conduct of cross-cultural research with marginalised groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Researcher\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Researcher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:研究的一个重要组成部分是患者和公众参与(PPI)。目的:介绍作者对罗姆人、吉普赛人和游民社区成员进行同伴访谈的反思:作者举例说明了从参与式研究项目中收集数据的反思,该项目探讨了吉普赛人、罗姆人和游民在其社区中的癌症经历。他们从与受访者具有相同种族背景的共同研究者("同行研究者")进行的录音、访谈后汇报中获得了反思。同行研究人员面临的主要挑战是文化、语言和实用性,所有这些挑战都与通过种族视角探讨敏感的健康话题密切相关:同伴研究人员认识到他们在参与者和研究团队之间搭建桥梁的作用。他们通过建立信任关系、尽量减少困扰、代表其所在社区的观点以及获取数据来实现项目目标。同伴研究人员在参与式研究的跨文化数据收集中扮演着多重角色:这篇文章强调了同伴研究人员工作中尚未被充分探索的方面,这些方面对规划和开展边缘化群体跨文化研究具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public involvement in participatory research: the experiences of peer interviewers from Roma, Gypsy and Traveller communities.

Background: A vital component of research is patient and public involvement (PPI). The challenges of PPI increase when conducting cross-cultural research into sensitive subjects with marginalised ethnic minority groups.

Aim: To present the authors' reflections on conducting peer interviews with members of Roma, Gypsy and Traveller communities.

Discussion: The authors provide examples of reflections on collecting data from a participatory research project that explored Gypsies, Roma and Travellers' experiences of cancer in their communities. They derived the reflections from audio-recorded, post-interview debriefs with co-researchers from the same ethnic backgrounds as interviewees ('peer researchers'). The main challenges for the peer researchers were cultural, linguistic and pragmatic, all fundamentally related to exploring a sensitive health topic through the lens of ethnicity.

Conclusion: Peer researchers recognised their role in building bridges between participants and the research team. They did this by establishing a relationship of trust, minimising distress, representing the views of their communities and obtaining data to meet the aims of the project. Peer researchers perform multiple roles to assist in cross-cultural data collection in participatory research.

Implications for practice: This article highlights underexplored aspects of peer researchers' work that have implications for the planning and conduct of cross-cultural research with marginalised groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Researcher
Nurse Researcher NURSING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Additionally, the website provides a range of Internet links to the latest research news, conference information, jobs and grants, and other resources. We hope that this site becomes an invaluable interactive resource for both novice and experienced researchers. If you have any comments or suggestions to improve the site, or details of additional websites that could be usefully added, please let us know. We very much welcome your ideas so that we can provide the kind of online resource that will best help you to develop your research.
期刊最新文献
Theoretical sensitivity and reflexivity in grounded theory. The methodological challenges faced when conducting hydration research in UK care homes. Reflections on being an insider researcher: a study exploring the experiences of men accessing rural mental health services. A reflection on the use of virtual nominal group technique in health policy and research priority consensus studies. A worked example of contextualising and using reflexive thematic analysis in nursing research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1