福岛第一核电站事故十年:世界专家预测的影响是否正确?]

Hiroshi Yasuda
{"title":"福岛第一核电站事故十年:世界专家预测的影响是否正确?]","authors":"Hiroshi Yasuda","doi":"10.11323/jjmp.41.3_127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident (hereinafter referred to as the \"Fukushima Daiichi accident\") occurred in March 2011, many experts around the world have conducted the assessments on radiation doses and health effects attributed to the Fukushima Daiichi accident. During the months soon after the accident while the state of the nuclear reactor was not accurately grasped, the radiation exposure of the residents was estimated based on the predicted environmental behavior of various radionuclides. However, there were significant differences in the estimated doses and effects presented by different researchers and research institutes. As investigations on the causes and progress of the Fukushima Daiichi accident have progressed in last 10 years, now we know better the situation and consequence of the accident. In this article, the contents of relevant papers and reports published during the three years (-2014) after the Fukushima Daiichi accident are briefly reviewed and then compared with the relatively new scientific information obtained in 2015 or later. Through these analyses, the author tries to look back on how correct or incorrect the initial estimates were.</p>","PeriodicalId":13394,"journal":{"name":"Igaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics","volume":"41 3","pages":"127-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Ten Years from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident: Were the Predicted Effects Reported by Worldwide Experts Correct?]\",\"authors\":\"Hiroshi Yasuda\",\"doi\":\"10.11323/jjmp.41.3_127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident (hereinafter referred to as the \\\"Fukushima Daiichi accident\\\") occurred in March 2011, many experts around the world have conducted the assessments on radiation doses and health effects attributed to the Fukushima Daiichi accident. During the months soon after the accident while the state of the nuclear reactor was not accurately grasped, the radiation exposure of the residents was estimated based on the predicted environmental behavior of various radionuclides. However, there were significant differences in the estimated doses and effects presented by different researchers and research institutes. As investigations on the causes and progress of the Fukushima Daiichi accident have progressed in last 10 years, now we know better the situation and consequence of the accident. In this article, the contents of relevant papers and reports published during the three years (-2014) after the Fukushima Daiichi accident are briefly reviewed and then compared with the relatively new scientific information obtained in 2015 or later. Through these analyses, the author tries to look back on how correct or incorrect the initial estimates were.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Igaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"127-133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Igaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11323/jjmp.41.3_127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Igaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11323/jjmp.41.3_127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2011年3月发生福岛第一核电站事故(以下简称"福岛第一事故")以来,世界各地的许多专家对福岛第一事故造成的辐射剂量和健康影响进行了评估。在事故发生后不久的几个月里,由于没有准确掌握核反应堆的状态,根据预测的各种放射性核素的环境行为,估计了居民的辐射暴露。然而,不同研究人员和研究机构提出的估计剂量和效应存在显著差异。近10年来,随着对福岛第一核电站事故起因和进展的调查不断深入,现在我们对事故的情况和后果有了更好的了解。本文简要回顾了福岛第一核电站事故发生后3年(-2014年)期间发表的相关论文和报告的内容,并与2015年及之后获得的相对较新的科学信息进行了比较。通过这些分析,作者试图回顾最初的估计是正确的还是错误的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Ten Years from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident: Were the Predicted Effects Reported by Worldwide Experts Correct?]

Since the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident (hereinafter referred to as the "Fukushima Daiichi accident") occurred in March 2011, many experts around the world have conducted the assessments on radiation doses and health effects attributed to the Fukushima Daiichi accident. During the months soon after the accident while the state of the nuclear reactor was not accurately grasped, the radiation exposure of the residents was estimated based on the predicted environmental behavior of various radionuclides. However, there were significant differences in the estimated doses and effects presented by different researchers and research institutes. As investigations on the causes and progress of the Fukushima Daiichi accident have progressed in last 10 years, now we know better the situation and consequence of the accident. In this article, the contents of relevant papers and reports published during the three years (-2014) after the Fukushima Daiichi accident are briefly reviewed and then compared with the relatively new scientific information obtained in 2015 or later. Through these analyses, the author tries to look back on how correct or incorrect the initial estimates were.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Technical Report: Quality Assurance for 125I Seed Sources in Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy]. [INTRODUCTION OF AWARDS OF RPT IN 2021]. [EDITOR'S NOTE]. [Effects of sample size and data augmentation on U-Net-based automatic segmentation of various organs].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1