18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT诊断范围:与多参数MRI及骨显像评估早期前列腺癌复发的比较

IF 2 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging Pub Date : 2021-10-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01
Laura Saule, Maija Radzina, Mara Liepa, Lilita Roznere, Marika Kalnina, Andrejs Lioznovs, Edgars Mamis, Madara Mikelsone, Juergen Biederer, Egils Vjaters
{"title":"18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT诊断范围:与多参数MRI及骨显像评估早期前列腺癌复发的比较","authors":"Laura Saule,&nbsp;Maija Radzina,&nbsp;Mara Liepa,&nbsp;Lilita Roznere,&nbsp;Marika Kalnina,&nbsp;Andrejs Lioznovs,&nbsp;Edgars Mamis,&nbsp;Madara Mikelsone,&nbsp;Juergen Biederer,&nbsp;Egils Vjaters","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic tools-<sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography (PET/CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scintigraphy for the evaluation of local recurrence, regional lymph nodes and bone metastases of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). 28 PCa patients after radical prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy and with biochemical relapse were enrolled in this study. The evaluation of local recurrence and regional lymph node metastases was based on results of PET/CT and MRI. Local recurrent disease in 28 patients was detected by PET/CT in 36% (10/28) and by MRI in 32% (9/28) with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of 90.9%, 100%, 96.4% and 81.8%, 100%, 92.9%, respectively (kappa 0.92, P<0.001). Nodal involvement was confirmed by PET/CT and MRI in 46% (13/28) and 25% (7/28) with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for PET/CT 92.3%, 93.3%, 92.9% and for MRI-53.8%, 100%, 78.6%, respectively (kappa 0.57, P<0.001). The evaluation of skeletal metastases was based on PET/CT and bone scintigraphy. Bone metastases were seen on PET/CT and bone scintigraphy in 21% (6/28) and 20% (5/25) with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100%; 91.7%; 92.9% and 50.0%; 85.7%; 80.0%, respectively (kappa 0.41, P<0.01). In conclusion, our comparative study demonstrates advantages of <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT compared to MRI and scintigraphy for the evaluation of recurrent prostate cancer. Both methods, <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI, detect local recurrence with high accuracy and excellent agreement, which may be attributed to the low urinary background clearance of <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007.</p>","PeriodicalId":7572,"journal":{"name":"American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569331/pdf/ajnmmi0011-0395.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic scope of <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT: comparison with multiparametric MRI and bone scintigraphy for the assessment of early prostate cancer recurrence.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Saule,&nbsp;Maija Radzina,&nbsp;Mara Liepa,&nbsp;Lilita Roznere,&nbsp;Marika Kalnina,&nbsp;Andrejs Lioznovs,&nbsp;Edgars Mamis,&nbsp;Madara Mikelsone,&nbsp;Juergen Biederer,&nbsp;Egils Vjaters\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic tools-<sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography (PET/CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scintigraphy for the evaluation of local recurrence, regional lymph nodes and bone metastases of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). 28 PCa patients after radical prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy and with biochemical relapse were enrolled in this study. The evaluation of local recurrence and regional lymph node metastases was based on results of PET/CT and MRI. Local recurrent disease in 28 patients was detected by PET/CT in 36% (10/28) and by MRI in 32% (9/28) with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of 90.9%, 100%, 96.4% and 81.8%, 100%, 92.9%, respectively (kappa 0.92, P<0.001). Nodal involvement was confirmed by PET/CT and MRI in 46% (13/28) and 25% (7/28) with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for PET/CT 92.3%, 93.3%, 92.9% and for MRI-53.8%, 100%, 78.6%, respectively (kappa 0.57, P<0.001). The evaluation of skeletal metastases was based on PET/CT and bone scintigraphy. Bone metastases were seen on PET/CT and bone scintigraphy in 21% (6/28) and 20% (5/25) with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100%; 91.7%; 92.9% and 50.0%; 85.7%; 80.0%, respectively (kappa 0.41, P<0.01). In conclusion, our comparative study demonstrates advantages of <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT compared to MRI and scintigraphy for the evaluation of recurrent prostate cancer. Both methods, <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI, detect local recurrence with high accuracy and excellent agreement, which may be attributed to the low urinary background clearance of <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569331/pdf/ajnmmi0011-0395.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较18f - psma -1007正电子发射断层扫描(PET/CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)和骨显像对复发性前列腺癌(PCa)局部复发、区域淋巴结和骨转移的评估。本研究纳入28例根治性前列腺切除术和/或放疗后生化复发的前列腺癌患者。局部复发和区域淋巴结转移的评估基于PET/CT和MRI的结果。28例患者中,PET/CT检出局部复发病变的比例为36% (10/28),MRI检出局部复发病变的比例为32%(9/28),其敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为90.9%、100%、96.4%和81.8%、100%、92.9% (kappa 0.92, P18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT与MRI和显像相比较)。18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT和MRI两种方法对局部复发的检测准确率高,一致性好,这可能与18F-PSMA-1007的尿背景清除率低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic scope of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT: comparison with multiparametric MRI and bone scintigraphy for the assessment of early prostate cancer recurrence.

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic tools-18F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography (PET/CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scintigraphy for the evaluation of local recurrence, regional lymph nodes and bone metastases of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). 28 PCa patients after radical prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy and with biochemical relapse were enrolled in this study. The evaluation of local recurrence and regional lymph node metastases was based on results of PET/CT and MRI. Local recurrent disease in 28 patients was detected by PET/CT in 36% (10/28) and by MRI in 32% (9/28) with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of 90.9%, 100%, 96.4% and 81.8%, 100%, 92.9%, respectively (kappa 0.92, P<0.001). Nodal involvement was confirmed by PET/CT and MRI in 46% (13/28) and 25% (7/28) with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for PET/CT 92.3%, 93.3%, 92.9% and for MRI-53.8%, 100%, 78.6%, respectively (kappa 0.57, P<0.001). The evaluation of skeletal metastases was based on PET/CT and bone scintigraphy. Bone metastases were seen on PET/CT and bone scintigraphy in 21% (6/28) and 20% (5/25) with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100%; 91.7%; 92.9% and 50.0%; 85.7%; 80.0%, respectively (kappa 0.41, P<0.01). In conclusion, our comparative study demonstrates advantages of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT compared to MRI and scintigraphy for the evaluation of recurrent prostate cancer. Both methods, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI, detect local recurrence with high accuracy and excellent agreement, which may be attributed to the low urinary background clearance of 18F-PSMA-1007.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
4.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: The scope of AJNMMI encompasses all areas of molecular imaging, including but not limited to: positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), molecular magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, optical bioluminescence, optical fluorescence, targeted ultrasound, photoacoustic imaging, etc. AJNMMI welcomes original and review articles on both clinical investigation and preclinical research. Occasionally, special topic issues, short communications, editorials, and invited perspectives will also be published. Manuscripts, including figures and tables, must be original and not under consideration by another journal.
期刊最新文献
A radioactive and fluorescent dual modality cysteine cathepsin-B activity-based probe for the detection and treatment evaluation in rheumatoid arthritis. Accurate brain pharmacokinetic parametric imaging using the blood input function extracted from the cavernous sinus. Analysis of bone single-photon emission CT/CT and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: focusing on the correlation between standardized uptake values and apparent diffusion coefficient values. Hemodynamic characteristics of vertebrobasilar artery fenestration combined with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia: a study based on magnetic resonance angiography. Radiomics-based model for prediction of TGF-β1 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1