农业和林业创新专题网络中的多行为体方法。

IF 4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Agricultural and Food Economics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-17 DOI:10.1186/s40100-021-00209-0
Elena Feo, Pieter Spanoghe, Els Berckmoes, Elodie Pascal, Rosa Mosquera-Losada, Alexander Opdebeeck, Sylvia Burssens
{"title":"农业和林业创新专题网络中的多行为体方法。","authors":"Elena Feo, Pieter Spanoghe, Els Berckmoes, Elodie Pascal, Rosa Mosquera-Losada, Alexander Opdebeeck, Sylvia Burssens","doi":"10.1186/s40100-021-00209-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The co-creation and sharing of knowledge among different types of actors with complementary expertise is known as the Multi-Actor Approach (MAA). This paper presents how Horizon2020 Thematic-Networks (TNs) deal with the MAA and put forward best practices during the different project phases, based on the results of a desktop study, interviews, surveys and expert workshops. The study shows that not all types of actors are equally involved in TN consortia and participatory activities, meaning TNs might be not sufficiently demand-driven and the uptake of the results is not optimal. Facilitators are key to contributing to the relationships and the mutual understanding between different actors. Moreover, a user-friendly digital knowledge platform linked to demonstration activities and peer-to-peer exchange can improve the sharing of knowledge, enhancing impact in agricultural and forestry innovation in the longer term.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40100-021-00209-0.</p>","PeriodicalId":37688,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Food Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The multi-actor approach in thematic networks for agriculture and forestry innovation.\",\"authors\":\"Elena Feo, Pieter Spanoghe, Els Berckmoes, Elodie Pascal, Rosa Mosquera-Losada, Alexander Opdebeeck, Sylvia Burssens\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40100-021-00209-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The co-creation and sharing of knowledge among different types of actors with complementary expertise is known as the Multi-Actor Approach (MAA). This paper presents how Horizon2020 Thematic-Networks (TNs) deal with the MAA and put forward best practices during the different project phases, based on the results of a desktop study, interviews, surveys and expert workshops. The study shows that not all types of actors are equally involved in TN consortia and participatory activities, meaning TNs might be not sufficiently demand-driven and the uptake of the results is not optimal. Facilitators are key to contributing to the relationships and the mutual understanding between different actors. Moreover, a user-friendly digital knowledge platform linked to demonstration activities and peer-to-peer exchange can improve the sharing of knowledge, enhancing impact in agricultural and forestry innovation in the longer term.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40100-021-00209-0.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Food Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761514/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Food Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-021-00209-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Food Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-021-00209-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

具有互补专长的不同类型参与者共同创造和共享知识被称为多部门方法(MAA)。本文以桌面研究、访谈、调查和专家研讨会的结果为基础,介绍了地平线2020主题网络(TN)在不同项目阶段如何处理多部门方法并提出最佳实践。研究结果表明,并非所有类型的参与者都能平等地参与到 TN 联合体和参与性活动中,这意味着 TN 的需求驱动力可能不足,对成果的吸收也不尽人意。推动者是促进不同参与者之间的关系和相互理解的关键。此外,一个与示范活动和同行交流相联系的用户友好型数字知识平台可以改善知识共享,从长远角度提高农业和林业创新的影响力:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1186/s40100-021-00209-0。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The multi-actor approach in thematic networks for agriculture and forestry innovation.

The co-creation and sharing of knowledge among different types of actors with complementary expertise is known as the Multi-Actor Approach (MAA). This paper presents how Horizon2020 Thematic-Networks (TNs) deal with the MAA and put forward best practices during the different project phases, based on the results of a desktop study, interviews, surveys and expert workshops. The study shows that not all types of actors are equally involved in TN consortia and participatory activities, meaning TNs might be not sufficiently demand-driven and the uptake of the results is not optimal. Facilitators are key to contributing to the relationships and the mutual understanding between different actors. Moreover, a user-friendly digital knowledge platform linked to demonstration activities and peer-to-peer exchange can improve the sharing of knowledge, enhancing impact in agricultural and forestry innovation in the longer term.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40100-021-00209-0.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural and Food Economics
Agricultural and Food Economics Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Food Economics (AFE) is an international peer-reviewed and open access journal published on behalf of the Italian Society of Agricultural Economics. AFE welcomes research articles from economists, scholars and researchers from all over the world to publish problem-oriented and high-quality articles. AFE publishes only original articles from a wide variety of economic perspectives that address current and relevant issues related to the agricultural and food system. AFE publishes articles focused on applied analysis, the discussion of innovative results, and relevant policy and managerial implications. AFE seeks clearly written articles from experts in the field, to promote insightful understanding of the current trends in the agri-food system. Topics of specific interest to AFE include agricultural and food market analysis, agri-food firm management and marketing, organization of the agri-food chains, consumer behavior, food quality and safety issues, economics of nutrition and food security, food and health economics, agri-food policy and trade, sustainable rural development, natural and marine resource economics and land economics.
期刊最新文献
Has transformation of food systems reached an impasse? Considerations on the role of agri-food research Sustainability challenges in the multi-tier crop agri-food sector: a systematic review The cereal network: a baseline approach to current configurations of trade communities Climate change impact on yield and income of Italian agriculture system: a scoping review Are university students really hungry for sustainability? A choice experiment on new food products from circular economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1