多参数磁共振成像后,哪些前列腺癌疑似患者可以从Proclarix获益?

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY International Journal of Biological Markers Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-24 DOI:10.1177/03936155221081537
Juan Morote, Miriam Campistol, Lucas Regis, Anna Celma, Inés de Torres, Maria E Semidey, Sarai Roche, Richard Mast, Anna Santamaria, Jacques Planas, Enrique Trilla
{"title":"多参数磁共振成像后,哪些前列腺癌疑似患者可以从Proclarix获益?","authors":"Juan Morote,&nbsp;Miriam Campistol,&nbsp;Lucas Regis,&nbsp;Anna Celma,&nbsp;Inés de Torres,&nbsp;Maria E Semidey,&nbsp;Sarai Roche,&nbsp;Richard Mast,&nbsp;Anna Santamaria,&nbsp;Jacques Planas,&nbsp;Enrique Trilla","doi":"10.1177/03936155221081537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proclarix is a new blood-based test to assess the likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as <u>></u>2 grade group. In this study, we analyzed whether Proclarix and PSA density (PSAD) could improve the selection of candidates for prostate biopsy after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Proclarix and PSAD were assessed in 567 consecutive men with suspected PCa in whom pre-biopsy 3 Tesla mpMRI, scoring with Prostate Imaging-Report and Data System (PI-RADS) v.2, and guided and/or systematic biopsies were performed. Proclarix and PSAD thresholds having csPCa sensitivity over 90% were found at 10% and 0.07 ng/(mL*cm<sup>3</sup>), respectively. Among 100 men with negative mpMRI (PI-RADS <3), csPCa was detected in 6 cases, which would have been undetected if systematic biopsies were avoided. However, Proclarix suggested performing a biopsy on 70% of men with negative mpMRI. In contrast, PSAD only detected 50% of csPCa and required 71% of prostate biopsies. In 169 men with PI-RADS 3, Proclarix avoided 21.3% of prostate biopsies and detected all 25 cases of csPCa, while PSAD avoided 26.3% of biopsies, but missed 16% of csPCa. In 190 men with PI-RADS 4 and 108 with PI-RADS 5, Proclarix avoided 12.1% and 5.6% of prostate biopsies, but missed 4.8% and 1% of csPCa, respectively. PSAD avoided 18.4% and 9.3% of biopsies, but missed 11.4% and 4.2% csPCa, respectively. We conclude that Proclarix outperformed PSAD in the selection of candidates for prostate biopsy, especially in men with PI-RADS <u><</u>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":50334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biological Markers","volume":"37 2","pages":"218-223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who with suspected prostate cancer can benefit from Proclarix after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging?\",\"authors\":\"Juan Morote,&nbsp;Miriam Campistol,&nbsp;Lucas Regis,&nbsp;Anna Celma,&nbsp;Inés de Torres,&nbsp;Maria E Semidey,&nbsp;Sarai Roche,&nbsp;Richard Mast,&nbsp;Anna Santamaria,&nbsp;Jacques Planas,&nbsp;Enrique Trilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03936155221081537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Proclarix is a new blood-based test to assess the likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as <u>></u>2 grade group. In this study, we analyzed whether Proclarix and PSA density (PSAD) could improve the selection of candidates for prostate biopsy after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Proclarix and PSAD were assessed in 567 consecutive men with suspected PCa in whom pre-biopsy 3 Tesla mpMRI, scoring with Prostate Imaging-Report and Data System (PI-RADS) v.2, and guided and/or systematic biopsies were performed. Proclarix and PSAD thresholds having csPCa sensitivity over 90% were found at 10% and 0.07 ng/(mL*cm<sup>3</sup>), respectively. Among 100 men with negative mpMRI (PI-RADS <3), csPCa was detected in 6 cases, which would have been undetected if systematic biopsies were avoided. However, Proclarix suggested performing a biopsy on 70% of men with negative mpMRI. In contrast, PSAD only detected 50% of csPCa and required 71% of prostate biopsies. In 169 men with PI-RADS 3, Proclarix avoided 21.3% of prostate biopsies and detected all 25 cases of csPCa, while PSAD avoided 26.3% of biopsies, but missed 16% of csPCa. In 190 men with PI-RADS 4 and 108 with PI-RADS 5, Proclarix avoided 12.1% and 5.6% of prostate biopsies, but missed 4.8% and 1% of csPCa, respectively. PSAD avoided 18.4% and 9.3% of biopsies, but missed 11.4% and 4.2% csPCa, respectively. We conclude that Proclarix outperformed PSAD in the selection of candidates for prostate biopsy, especially in men with PI-RADS <u><</u>3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Biological Markers\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"218-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Biological Markers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03936155221081537\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biological Markers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03936155221081537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Proclarix是一种新的血液检测,用于评估临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)的可能性,定义为>2级组。在这项研究中,我们分析了Proclarix和PSA密度(PSAD)是否可以改善多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)后前列腺活检候选人的选择。对567名疑似PCa的连续男性进行Proclarix和PSAD评估,其中活检前3 Tesla mpMRI,前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS) v.2评分,并进行指导和/或系统活检。Proclarix和PSAD阈值分别为10%和0.07 ng/(mL*cm3), csPCa敏感性超过90%。100例mpMRI (PI-RADS)阴性的男性中3例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who with suspected prostate cancer can benefit from Proclarix after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging?

Proclarix is a new blood-based test to assess the likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as >2 grade group. In this study, we analyzed whether Proclarix and PSA density (PSAD) could improve the selection of candidates for prostate biopsy after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Proclarix and PSAD were assessed in 567 consecutive men with suspected PCa in whom pre-biopsy 3 Tesla mpMRI, scoring with Prostate Imaging-Report and Data System (PI-RADS) v.2, and guided and/or systematic biopsies were performed. Proclarix and PSAD thresholds having csPCa sensitivity over 90% were found at 10% and 0.07 ng/(mL*cm3), respectively. Among 100 men with negative mpMRI (PI-RADS <3), csPCa was detected in 6 cases, which would have been undetected if systematic biopsies were avoided. However, Proclarix suggested performing a biopsy on 70% of men with negative mpMRI. In contrast, PSAD only detected 50% of csPCa and required 71% of prostate biopsies. In 169 men with PI-RADS 3, Proclarix avoided 21.3% of prostate biopsies and detected all 25 cases of csPCa, while PSAD avoided 26.3% of biopsies, but missed 16% of csPCa. In 190 men with PI-RADS 4 and 108 with PI-RADS 5, Proclarix avoided 12.1% and 5.6% of prostate biopsies, but missed 4.8% and 1% of csPCa, respectively. PSAD avoided 18.4% and 9.3% of biopsies, but missed 11.4% and 4.2% csPCa, respectively. We conclude that Proclarix outperformed PSAD in the selection of candidates for prostate biopsy, especially in men with PI-RADS <3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Biological Markers
International Journal of Biological Markers 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: IJBM is an international, online only, peer-reviewed Journal, which publishes original research and critical reviews primarily focused on cancer biomarkers. IJBM targets advanced topics regarding the application of biomarkers in oncology and is dedicated to solid tumors in adult subjects. The clinical scenarios of interests are screening and early diagnosis of cancer, prognostic assessment, prediction of the response to and monitoring of treatment.
期刊最新文献
Impact of metabolism-related markers on outcomes in ovarian cancer patients: Findings of the MITO16A/MaNGO-OV2 trial. CircLPHN3 correlates with prognosis in colorectal cancer and regulates cellular processes by targeting miR-142-5p. Prognostic value of miR-190a-5p in renal cell cancer and its regulatory effect on tumor progression. Circulating exosomal miRNA-451 as an effective diagnostic biomarker and prognostic indicator for multiple myeloma. Inflammatory markers related to survival in breast cancer patients: Peru.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1