在急性胰腺炎中,器官功能衰竭顺序评估评分优于其他预后指数。

Thomas Zheng Jie Teng, Jun Kiat Thaddaeus Tan, Samantha Baey, Sivaraj K Gunasekaran, Sameer P Junnarkar, Jee Keem Low, Cheong Wei Terence Huey, Vishal G Shelat
{"title":"在急性胰腺炎中,器官功能衰竭顺序评估评分优于其他预后指数。","authors":"Thomas Zheng Jie Teng, Jun Kiat Thaddaeus Tan, Samantha Baey, Sivaraj K Gunasekaran, Sameer P Junnarkar, Jee Keem Low, Cheong Wei Terence Huey, Vishal G Shelat","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.v10.i6.355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common surgical condition, with severe AP (SAP) potentially lethal. Many prognostic indices, including; acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score (APACHE II), bedside index of severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP), Glasgow score, harmless acute pancreatitis score (HAPS), Ranson's score, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) evaluate AP severity and predict mortality.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate these indices' utility in predicting severity, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 653 patients with AP from July 2009 to September 2016 was performed. The demographic, clinical profile, and patient outcomes were collected. SAP was defined as <i>per</i> the revised Atlanta classification. Values for APACHE II score, BISAP, HAPS, and SOFA within 24 h of admission were retrospectively obtained based on laboratory results and patient evaluation recorded on a secure hospital-based online electronic platform. Data with < 10% missing data was imputed <i>via</i> mean substitution. Other patient information such as demographics, disease etiology, and patient outcomes were also derived from electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 58.7 ± 17.5 years, with 58.7% males. Gallstones (<i>n</i> = 404, 61.9%), alcohol (<i>n</i> = 38, 5.8%), and hypertriglyceridemia (<i>n</i> = 19, 2.9%) were more common aetiologies. 81 (12.4%) patients developed SAP, 20 (3.1%) required ICU admission, and 12 (1.8%) deaths were attributed to SAP. Ranson's score and APACHE-II demonstrated the highest sensitivity in predicting SAP (92.6%, 80.2% respectively), ICU admission (100%), and mortality (100%). While SOFA and BISAP demonstrated lowest sensitivity in predicting SAP (13.6%, 24.7% respectively), ICU admission (40.0%, 25.0% respectively) and mortality (50.0%, 25.5% respectively). However, SOFA demonstrated the highest specificity in predicting SAP (99.7%), ICU admission (99.2%), and mortality (98.9%). SOFA demonstrated the highest positive predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and overall accuracy in predicting SAP, ICU admission, and mortality. SOFA and Ranson's score demonstrated the highest area under receiver-operator curves at 48 h in predicting SAP (0.966, 0.857 respectively), ICU admission (0.943, 0.946 respectively), and mortality (0.968, 0.917 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SOFA and 48-h Ranson's scores accurately predict severity, ICU admission, and mortality in AP, with more favorable statistics for the SOFA score.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/de/WJCCM-10-355.PMC8613719.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequential organ failure assessment score is superior to other prognostic indices in acute pancreatitis.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Zheng Jie Teng, Jun Kiat Thaddaeus Tan, Samantha Baey, Sivaraj K Gunasekaran, Sameer P Junnarkar, Jee Keem Low, Cheong Wei Terence Huey, Vishal G Shelat\",\"doi\":\"10.5492/wjccm.v10.i6.355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common surgical condition, with severe AP (SAP) potentially lethal. Many prognostic indices, including; acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score (APACHE II), bedside index of severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP), Glasgow score, harmless acute pancreatitis score (HAPS), Ranson's score, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) evaluate AP severity and predict mortality.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate these indices' utility in predicting severity, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 653 patients with AP from July 2009 to September 2016 was performed. The demographic, clinical profile, and patient outcomes were collected. SAP was defined as <i>per</i> the revised Atlanta classification. Values for APACHE II score, BISAP, HAPS, and SOFA within 24 h of admission were retrospectively obtained based on laboratory results and patient evaluation recorded on a secure hospital-based online electronic platform. Data with < 10% missing data was imputed <i>via</i> mean substitution. Other patient information such as demographics, disease etiology, and patient outcomes were also derived from electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 58.7 ± 17.5 years, with 58.7% males. Gallstones (<i>n</i> = 404, 61.9%), alcohol (<i>n</i> = 38, 5.8%), and hypertriglyceridemia (<i>n</i> = 19, 2.9%) were more common aetiologies. 81 (12.4%) patients developed SAP, 20 (3.1%) required ICU admission, and 12 (1.8%) deaths were attributed to SAP. Ranson's score and APACHE-II demonstrated the highest sensitivity in predicting SAP (92.6%, 80.2% respectively), ICU admission (100%), and mortality (100%). While SOFA and BISAP demonstrated lowest sensitivity in predicting SAP (13.6%, 24.7% respectively), ICU admission (40.0%, 25.0% respectively) and mortality (50.0%, 25.5% respectively). However, SOFA demonstrated the highest specificity in predicting SAP (99.7%), ICU admission (99.2%), and mortality (98.9%). SOFA demonstrated the highest positive predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and overall accuracy in predicting SAP, ICU admission, and mortality. SOFA and Ranson's score demonstrated the highest area under receiver-operator curves at 48 h in predicting SAP (0.966, 0.857 respectively), ICU admission (0.943, 0.946 respectively), and mortality (0.968, 0.917 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SOFA and 48-h Ranson's scores accurately predict severity, ICU admission, and mortality in AP, with more favorable statistics for the SOFA score.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":66959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/de/WJCCM-10-355.PMC8613719.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v10.i6.355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v10.i6.355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性胰腺炎(AP)是一种常见的外科疾病,重症胰腺炎(SAP)可能致命。许多预后指数,包括急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分(APACHE II)、急性胰腺炎床旁严重程度指数(BISAP)、格拉斯哥评分、无害急性胰腺炎评分(HAPS)、兰森评分和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA),可评估急性胰腺炎的严重程度并预测死亡率:方法:对2009年7月至2016年9月期间的653例AP患者进行回顾性分析。方法:对 2009 年 7 月至 2016 年 9 月期间的 653 例 AP 患者进行了回顾性分析,收集了人口统计学、临床概况和患者预后。SAP根据修订后的亚特兰大分类法进行定义。入院24小时内的APACHE II评分、BISAP、HAPS和SOFA值是根据实验室结果和医院安全在线电子平台记录的患者评估结果回顾性得出的。对于缺失率小于 10% 的数据,将通过平均替代法进行估算。其他患者信息,如人口统计学、疾病病因学和患者预后也来自电子病历:平均年龄为 58.7 ± 17.5 岁,男性占 58.7%。胆结石(404 人,61.9%)、酒精(38 人,5.8%)和高甘油三酯血症(19 人,2.9%)是较常见的病因。81(12.4%)名患者出现 SAP,20(3.1%)名患者需要入住重症监护室,12(1.8%)名患者的死亡归因于 SAP。兰森评分和 APACHE-II 在预测 SAP(分别为 92.6% 和 80.2%)、入住 ICU(100%)和死亡率(100%)方面显示出最高的灵敏度。而 SOFA 和 BISAP 预测 SAP(分别为 13.6%、24.7%)、入住 ICU(分别为 40.0%、25.0%)和死亡率(分别为 50.0%、25.5%)的灵敏度最低。然而,SOFA 在预测 SAP(99.7%)、入住 ICU(99.2%)和死亡率(98.9%)方面的特异性最高。在预测 SAP、入住 ICU 和死亡率方面,SOFA 显示出最高的阳性预测值、阳性似然比、诊断几率比和总体准确性。在预测SAP(分别为0.966和0.857)、入住ICU(分别为0.943和0.946)和死亡率(分别为0.968和0.917)方面,SOFA和Ranson评分在48小时内显示出最高的接收器操作曲线下面积:结论:SOFA评分和48小时Ranson评分能准确预测AP的严重程度、入ICU时间和死亡率,其中SOFA评分的统计结果更为理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sequential organ failure assessment score is superior to other prognostic indices in acute pancreatitis.

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common surgical condition, with severe AP (SAP) potentially lethal. Many prognostic indices, including; acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score (APACHE II), bedside index of severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP), Glasgow score, harmless acute pancreatitis score (HAPS), Ranson's score, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) evaluate AP severity and predict mortality.

Aim: To evaluate these indices' utility in predicting severity, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 653 patients with AP from July 2009 to September 2016 was performed. The demographic, clinical profile, and patient outcomes were collected. SAP was defined as per the revised Atlanta classification. Values for APACHE II score, BISAP, HAPS, and SOFA within 24 h of admission were retrospectively obtained based on laboratory results and patient evaluation recorded on a secure hospital-based online electronic platform. Data with < 10% missing data was imputed via mean substitution. Other patient information such as demographics, disease etiology, and patient outcomes were also derived from electronic medical records.

Results: The mean age was 58.7 ± 17.5 years, with 58.7% males. Gallstones (n = 404, 61.9%), alcohol (n = 38, 5.8%), and hypertriglyceridemia (n = 19, 2.9%) were more common aetiologies. 81 (12.4%) patients developed SAP, 20 (3.1%) required ICU admission, and 12 (1.8%) deaths were attributed to SAP. Ranson's score and APACHE-II demonstrated the highest sensitivity in predicting SAP (92.6%, 80.2% respectively), ICU admission (100%), and mortality (100%). While SOFA and BISAP demonstrated lowest sensitivity in predicting SAP (13.6%, 24.7% respectively), ICU admission (40.0%, 25.0% respectively) and mortality (50.0%, 25.5% respectively). However, SOFA demonstrated the highest specificity in predicting SAP (99.7%), ICU admission (99.2%), and mortality (98.9%). SOFA demonstrated the highest positive predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and overall accuracy in predicting SAP, ICU admission, and mortality. SOFA and Ranson's score demonstrated the highest area under receiver-operator curves at 48 h in predicting SAP (0.966, 0.857 respectively), ICU admission (0.943, 0.946 respectively), and mortality (0.968, 0.917 respectively).

Conclusion: The SOFA and 48-h Ranson's scores accurately predict severity, ICU admission, and mortality in AP, with more favorable statistics for the SOFA score.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
期刊最新文献
Antimicrobial and synergistic effects of lemongrass and geranium essential oils against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida spp. Driving pressure: A useful tool for reducing postoperative pulmonary complications. Early clinical outcomes of two regimens of prophylactic antibiotics in cardiac surgical patients with delayed sternal closure. Impact of different intravenous bolus rates on fluid and electrolyte balance and mortality in critically ill patients. Low T3 vs low T3T4 euthyroid sick syndrome in septic shock patients: A prospective observational cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1