一个解释急诊医疗技术人员在紧急情况下决策过程的挑战的模型:一个有根据的理论。

Journal of injury & violence research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-23 DOI:10.5249/jivr.v14i1.1604
Meysam Safi-Keykaleh, Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh, Zohreh Ghomian, Katarina Bohm
{"title":"一个解释急诊医疗技术人员在紧急情况下决策过程的挑战的模型:一个有根据的理论。","authors":"Meysam Safi-Keykaleh,&nbsp;Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh,&nbsp;Zohreh Ghomian,&nbsp;Katarina Bohm","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v14i1.1604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To manage life-threatening conditions and reduce morbidity and mortality, pre-hospital's on-scene decision making is an influential factor. Since pre-hospital's decision making is a challenging process, it is necessary to be identified this process. This study was conducted to explore the model of Iranian emergency medical technicians' decision making in emergency situations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was applied through grounded theory method using direct field observations and semi-structured interviews. Purposeful sampling with 26 participants including 17 emergency medical technicians including dispatchers, physicians of medical directions, managers and 1 representative for court affairs was performed. Interviews were lasted from October 2018 to July 2019. Corbin and Strauss approach, 2015 (open, axial and selective coding) were used to analyze data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A paradigm model was developed to explain the relationships among the main categories. Decision making in the context of fear and concern was emerged as the core category. Unclear duties, insufficient authorities and competencies as well as lack of enough decision making's protocols and guidelines were categorized as casual conditions. Other important categories linked to the core category were interactions, feelings and \"customer focus approach\". Action-interaction strategies were taken by Emergency Medical technicians lead to some negative consequences that can threaten clinical outcome and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the finding of this study, Emergency Medical technicians' decision making in the context of fear and concern, as the core concept of this model, lead to decrease in quality of the pre-hospital services, stakeholders' dissatisfaction, hospital emergency units' overload, decrease in reputation of the Emergency Medical Technicians, threat to patient clinical outcome and patient safety. To prevent of these negative consequences, facilitation of the Emergency Medical Technicians' on-scene decision making is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":73795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of injury & violence research","volume":" ","pages":"53-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9115813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A model to explain the challenges of emergency medical technicians' decision making process in emergency situations: a grounded theory.\",\"authors\":\"Meysam Safi-Keykaleh,&nbsp;Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh,&nbsp;Zohreh Ghomian,&nbsp;Katarina Bohm\",\"doi\":\"10.5249/jivr.v14i1.1604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To manage life-threatening conditions and reduce morbidity and mortality, pre-hospital's on-scene decision making is an influential factor. Since pre-hospital's decision making is a challenging process, it is necessary to be identified this process. This study was conducted to explore the model of Iranian emergency medical technicians' decision making in emergency situations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was applied through grounded theory method using direct field observations and semi-structured interviews. Purposeful sampling with 26 participants including 17 emergency medical technicians including dispatchers, physicians of medical directions, managers and 1 representative for court affairs was performed. Interviews were lasted from October 2018 to July 2019. Corbin and Strauss approach, 2015 (open, axial and selective coding) were used to analyze data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A paradigm model was developed to explain the relationships among the main categories. Decision making in the context of fear and concern was emerged as the core category. Unclear duties, insufficient authorities and competencies as well as lack of enough decision making's protocols and guidelines were categorized as casual conditions. Other important categories linked to the core category were interactions, feelings and \\\"customer focus approach\\\". Action-interaction strategies were taken by Emergency Medical technicians lead to some negative consequences that can threaten clinical outcome and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the finding of this study, Emergency Medical technicians' decision making in the context of fear and concern, as the core concept of this model, lead to decrease in quality of the pre-hospital services, stakeholders' dissatisfaction, hospital emergency units' overload, decrease in reputation of the Emergency Medical Technicians, threat to patient clinical outcome and patient safety. To prevent of these negative consequences, facilitation of the Emergency Medical Technicians' on-scene decision making is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of injury & violence research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"53-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9115813/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of injury & violence research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v14i1.1604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of injury & violence research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v14i1.1604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:院前的现场决策是控制危及生命的疾病和降低发病率和死亡率的重要因素。由于院前决策是一个具有挑战性的过程,有必要确定这一过程。本研究旨在探讨伊朗紧急医疗技术人员在紧急情况下的决策模式。方法:本研究采用实地观察和半结构化访谈相结合的扎根理论方法。对26名参与者进行了有目的抽样,其中包括17名紧急医疗技术人员,包括调度员、医疗指导医生、管理人员和1名法院事务代表。访谈时间为2018年10月至2019年7月。使用Corbin和Strauss方法,2015(开放,轴向和选择性编码)来分析数据。结果:建立了一个范式模型来解释主要类别之间的关系。在恐惧和关切背景下的决策被作为核心类别出现。职责不明确、权力和能力不足以及缺乏足够的决策协议和指导方针被归类为临时条件。与核心类别相关的其他重要类别是互动、感受和“以客户为中心的方法”。急诊医疗技术人员采取的行动-互动策略导致了一些负面后果,可能威胁到临床结果和患者安全。结论:基于本研究的发现,以恐惧和担忧为核心概念的急诊技术人员的决策导致院前服务质量下降、利益相关者不满、医院急诊单位超负荷、急诊技术人员声誉下降、对患者临床结局和患者安全构成威胁。为了防止这些负面后果,建议为急救医疗技术人员的现场决策提供便利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A model to explain the challenges of emergency medical technicians' decision making process in emergency situations: a grounded theory.

Background: To manage life-threatening conditions and reduce morbidity and mortality, pre-hospital's on-scene decision making is an influential factor. Since pre-hospital's decision making is a challenging process, it is necessary to be identified this process. This study was conducted to explore the model of Iranian emergency medical technicians' decision making in emergency situations.

Methods: This study was applied through grounded theory method using direct field observations and semi-structured interviews. Purposeful sampling with 26 participants including 17 emergency medical technicians including dispatchers, physicians of medical directions, managers and 1 representative for court affairs was performed. Interviews were lasted from October 2018 to July 2019. Corbin and Strauss approach, 2015 (open, axial and selective coding) were used to analyze data.

Results: A paradigm model was developed to explain the relationships among the main categories. Decision making in the context of fear and concern was emerged as the core category. Unclear duties, insufficient authorities and competencies as well as lack of enough decision making's protocols and guidelines were categorized as casual conditions. Other important categories linked to the core category were interactions, feelings and "customer focus approach". Action-interaction strategies were taken by Emergency Medical technicians lead to some negative consequences that can threaten clinical outcome and patient safety.

Conclusions: Based on the finding of this study, Emergency Medical technicians' decision making in the context of fear and concern, as the core concept of this model, lead to decrease in quality of the pre-hospital services, stakeholders' dissatisfaction, hospital emergency units' overload, decrease in reputation of the Emergency Medical Technicians, threat to patient clinical outcome and patient safety. To prevent of these negative consequences, facilitation of the Emergency Medical Technicians' on-scene decision making is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating the impact of Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety symptoms in female victims of domestic violence. The magnitude of parental physical harms: a descriptive report of 76 abusive children in Isfahan. Deaths and clashes induced by rivalry among fans during FIFA World Cup 2022 in Bangladesh. Factors affecting the spiritual rehabilitation of people affected by natural disasters: a systematic review. US States with poor social health outcomes and more firearms have more morbidity due to mass shootings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1