[全踝关节置换术失败后的救助选择]。

4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Unfallchirurg Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-28 DOI:10.1007/s00113-022-01141-8
T Buchhorn, S F Baumbach, W Böcker, D Szymski, H Polzer
{"title":"[全踝关节置换术失败后的救助选择]。","authors":"T Buchhorn,&nbsp;S F Baumbach,&nbsp;W Böcker,&nbsp;D Szymski,&nbsp;H Polzer","doi":"10.1007/s00113-022-01141-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The number of patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle, which are treated by arthroplasty, has continuously increased in recent years. The survival time of these implants is far below the results following hip and knee arthroplasty. In some cases a failure rate of approximately 1% per year or a survival rate of 70% after 10 years has been reported. The most frequent reasons for revision of an ankle prosthesis are aseptic loosening, technical implantation errors and persisting pain. For the revision of an ankle prosthesis there are basically two treatment options. For a long time, ankle arthrodesis was considered the gold standard after a failed prosthesis. In recent years, there has been an increasing trend towards re-implantation of an ankle prosthesis, as this preserves the functionality and mobility of the ankle joint as far as possible. Depending on the reason for failure and the size of the bony defect, a decision must be made regarding a one-stage and a two-stage procedure with bone augmentation. This article presents the advantages and disadvantages of arthrodesis and revision arthroplasty after failed primary ankle arthroplasty and highlights the special features of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49397,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurg","volume":"125 3","pages":"211-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Salvage options following failed total ankle arthroplasty].\",\"authors\":\"T Buchhorn,&nbsp;S F Baumbach,&nbsp;W Böcker,&nbsp;D Szymski,&nbsp;H Polzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00113-022-01141-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The number of patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle, which are treated by arthroplasty, has continuously increased in recent years. The survival time of these implants is far below the results following hip and knee arthroplasty. In some cases a failure rate of approximately 1% per year or a survival rate of 70% after 10 years has been reported. The most frequent reasons for revision of an ankle prosthesis are aseptic loosening, technical implantation errors and persisting pain. For the revision of an ankle prosthesis there are basically two treatment options. For a long time, ankle arthrodesis was considered the gold standard after a failed prosthesis. In recent years, there has been an increasing trend towards re-implantation of an ankle prosthesis, as this preserves the functionality and mobility of the ankle joint as far as possible. Depending on the reason for failure and the size of the bony defect, a decision must be made regarding a one-stage and a two-stage procedure with bone augmentation. This article presents the advantages and disadvantages of arthrodesis and revision arthroplasty after failed primary ankle arthroplasty and highlights the special features of surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unfallchirurg\",\"volume\":\"125 3\",\"pages\":\"211-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unfallchirurg\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-022-01141-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurg","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-022-01141-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,通过关节置换术治疗踝关节骨性关节炎的患者数量不断增加。这些植入物的存活时间远远低于髋关节和膝关节置换术的结果。在某些情况下,每年的失败率约为1%,或10年后的存活率为70%。踝关节假体翻修最常见的原因是无菌性松动、技术植入错误和持续疼痛。对于踝关节假体的修复,基本上有两种治疗选择。长期以来,踝关节融合术被认为是假体失败后的金标准。近年来,重新植入踝关节假体的趋势越来越多,因为这样可以尽可能地保留踝关节的功能和活动能力。根据失败的原因和骨缺损的大小,必须决定是否进行一期和两期的骨增强手术。本文介绍了原发性踝关节置换术失败后进行关节融合术和翻修关节置换术的优缺点,并强调了手术的特殊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Salvage options following failed total ankle arthroplasty].

The number of patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle, which are treated by arthroplasty, has continuously increased in recent years. The survival time of these implants is far below the results following hip and knee arthroplasty. In some cases a failure rate of approximately 1% per year or a survival rate of 70% after 10 years has been reported. The most frequent reasons for revision of an ankle prosthesis are aseptic loosening, technical implantation errors and persisting pain. For the revision of an ankle prosthesis there are basically two treatment options. For a long time, ankle arthrodesis was considered the gold standard after a failed prosthesis. In recent years, there has been an increasing trend towards re-implantation of an ankle prosthesis, as this preserves the functionality and mobility of the ankle joint as far as possible. Depending on the reason for failure and the size of the bony defect, a decision must be made regarding a one-stage and a two-stage procedure with bone augmentation. This article presents the advantages and disadvantages of arthrodesis and revision arthroplasty after failed primary ankle arthroplasty and highlights the special features of surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Unfallchirurg
Unfallchirurg 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Unfallchirurg is an internationally recognised publication organ. The journal deals with all aspects of accident surgery and reconstruction surgery and serves the continuing medical education of surgeons and accident surgeons with own practices and those working in hospitals. Practically-oriented works provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of accident surgery. Besides the imparting of relevant background knowledge, the focus is on the assessment of scientific findings under consideration of practical experience. The reader is given concrete recommendations for his/her practical work.
期刊最新文献
[Implementation of a standardized clinical test kit for diagnostics of periprosthetic infections in the clinical routine. German version]. [Bifid median nerve as a coincidental finding in traumatology : Case report and review of the literature]. [3D printing in spinal surgery-Update]. [The role of color-coded duplex sonography in preoperative vascular diagnostics in plastic surgery]. [Update on 3D printing in the surgery of musculoskeletal tumors].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1