T Buchhorn, S F Baumbach, W Böcker, D Szymski, H Polzer
{"title":"[全踝关节置换术失败后的救助选择]。","authors":"T Buchhorn, S F Baumbach, W Böcker, D Szymski, H Polzer","doi":"10.1007/s00113-022-01141-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The number of patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle, which are treated by arthroplasty, has continuously increased in recent years. The survival time of these implants is far below the results following hip and knee arthroplasty. In some cases a failure rate of approximately 1% per year or a survival rate of 70% after 10 years has been reported. The most frequent reasons for revision of an ankle prosthesis are aseptic loosening, technical implantation errors and persisting pain. For the revision of an ankle prosthesis there are basically two treatment options. For a long time, ankle arthrodesis was considered the gold standard after a failed prosthesis. In recent years, there has been an increasing trend towards re-implantation of an ankle prosthesis, as this preserves the functionality and mobility of the ankle joint as far as possible. Depending on the reason for failure and the size of the bony defect, a decision must be made regarding a one-stage and a two-stage procedure with bone augmentation. This article presents the advantages and disadvantages of arthrodesis and revision arthroplasty after failed primary ankle arthroplasty and highlights the special features of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49397,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurg","volume":"125 3","pages":"211-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Salvage options following failed total ankle arthroplasty].\",\"authors\":\"T Buchhorn, S F Baumbach, W Böcker, D Szymski, H Polzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00113-022-01141-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The number of patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle, which are treated by arthroplasty, has continuously increased in recent years. The survival time of these implants is far below the results following hip and knee arthroplasty. In some cases a failure rate of approximately 1% per year or a survival rate of 70% after 10 years has been reported. The most frequent reasons for revision of an ankle prosthesis are aseptic loosening, technical implantation errors and persisting pain. For the revision of an ankle prosthesis there are basically two treatment options. For a long time, ankle arthrodesis was considered the gold standard after a failed prosthesis. In recent years, there has been an increasing trend towards re-implantation of an ankle prosthesis, as this preserves the functionality and mobility of the ankle joint as far as possible. Depending on the reason for failure and the size of the bony defect, a decision must be made regarding a one-stage and a two-stage procedure with bone augmentation. This article presents the advantages and disadvantages of arthrodesis and revision arthroplasty after failed primary ankle arthroplasty and highlights the special features of surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unfallchirurg\",\"volume\":\"125 3\",\"pages\":\"211-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unfallchirurg\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-022-01141-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurg","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-022-01141-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Salvage options following failed total ankle arthroplasty].
The number of patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle, which are treated by arthroplasty, has continuously increased in recent years. The survival time of these implants is far below the results following hip and knee arthroplasty. In some cases a failure rate of approximately 1% per year or a survival rate of 70% after 10 years has been reported. The most frequent reasons for revision of an ankle prosthesis are aseptic loosening, technical implantation errors and persisting pain. For the revision of an ankle prosthesis there are basically two treatment options. For a long time, ankle arthrodesis was considered the gold standard after a failed prosthesis. In recent years, there has been an increasing trend towards re-implantation of an ankle prosthesis, as this preserves the functionality and mobility of the ankle joint as far as possible. Depending on the reason for failure and the size of the bony defect, a decision must be made regarding a one-stage and a two-stage procedure with bone augmentation. This article presents the advantages and disadvantages of arthrodesis and revision arthroplasty after failed primary ankle arthroplasty and highlights the special features of surgery.
期刊介绍:
Der Unfallchirurg is an internationally recognised publication organ. The journal deals with all aspects of accident surgery and reconstruction surgery and serves the continuing medical education of surgeons and accident surgeons with own practices and those working in hospitals.
Practically-oriented works provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of accident surgery. Besides the imparting of relevant background knowledge, the focus is on the assessment of scientific findings under consideration of practical experience. The reader is given concrete recommendations for his/her practical work.