染色体形状群体的统计比较。

Carlos J Soto, Peiyao A Zhao, Kyle N Klein, David M Gilbert, Anuj Srivastava
{"title":"染色体形状群体的统计比较。","authors":"Carlos J Soto, Peiyao A Zhao, Kyle N Klein, David M Gilbert, Anuj Srivastava","doi":"10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9433812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper develops statistical tools for testing differences in shapes of chromosomes resulting from certain gene knockouts (KO), specifically RIF1 gene KO (RKO) and the cohesin subunit RAD21 gene KO (CKO). It utilizes a <i>two-sample test</i> for comparing shapes of KO chromosomes with wild type (WT) at two levels: (1) <i>Coarse shape analysis</i>, where one compares shapes of full or large parts of chromosomes, and (2) <i>Fine shape analysis</i>, where chromosomes are first segmented into (TAD-based) pieces and then the corresponding pieces are compared across populations. The shape comparisons - coarse and fine - are based on an elastic shape metric for comparing shapes of 3D curves. The experiments show that the KO populations, RKO and CKO, have statistically significant differences from WT at both coarse and fine levels. Furthermore, this framework highlights local regions where these differences are most prominent.</p>","PeriodicalId":74566,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging","volume":"2021 ","pages":"788-791"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8840943/pdf/nihms-1776570.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STATISTICAL COMPARISONS OF CHROMOSOMAL SHAPE POPULATIONS.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos J Soto, Peiyao A Zhao, Kyle N Klein, David M Gilbert, Anuj Srivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9433812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper develops statistical tools for testing differences in shapes of chromosomes resulting from certain gene knockouts (KO), specifically RIF1 gene KO (RKO) and the cohesin subunit RAD21 gene KO (CKO). It utilizes a <i>two-sample test</i> for comparing shapes of KO chromosomes with wild type (WT) at two levels: (1) <i>Coarse shape analysis</i>, where one compares shapes of full or large parts of chromosomes, and (2) <i>Fine shape analysis</i>, where chromosomes are first segmented into (TAD-based) pieces and then the corresponding pieces are compared across populations. The shape comparisons - coarse and fine - are based on an elastic shape metric for comparing shapes of 3D curves. The experiments show that the KO populations, RKO and CKO, have statistically significant differences from WT at both coarse and fine levels. Furthermore, this framework highlights local regions where these differences are most prominent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"2021 \",\"pages\":\"788-791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8840943/pdf/nihms-1776570.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9433812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9433812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文开发了统计工具,用于测试某些基因敲除(KO)导致的染色体形状差异,特别是 RIF1 基因敲除(RKO)和粘合素亚基 RAD21 基因敲除(CKO)。它利用双样本检验在两个层面上比较 KO 染色体与野生型(WT)的形状:(1) 粗形状分析,即比较染色体全部或大部分的形状;(2) 细形状分析,即首先将染色体分割成(基于 TAD 的)片段,然后比较不同群体的相应片段。粗略和精细的形状比较基于一种用于比较三维曲线形状的弹性形状指标。实验表明,KO 群体(RKO 和 CKO)与 WT 群体在粗略和精细程度上都有显著的统计学差异。此外,该框架还突出了这些差异最显著的局部区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
STATISTICAL COMPARISONS OF CHROMOSOMAL SHAPE POPULATIONS.

This paper develops statistical tools for testing differences in shapes of chromosomes resulting from certain gene knockouts (KO), specifically RIF1 gene KO (RKO) and the cohesin subunit RAD21 gene KO (CKO). It utilizes a two-sample test for comparing shapes of KO chromosomes with wild type (WT) at two levels: (1) Coarse shape analysis, where one compares shapes of full or large parts of chromosomes, and (2) Fine shape analysis, where chromosomes are first segmented into (TAD-based) pieces and then the corresponding pieces are compared across populations. The shape comparisons - coarse and fine - are based on an elastic shape metric for comparing shapes of 3D curves. The experiments show that the KO populations, RKO and CKO, have statistically significant differences from WT at both coarse and fine levels. Furthermore, this framework highlights local regions where these differences are most prominent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Harmonisation of Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgical Video Frames on Phantom Models. DART: DEFORMABLE ANATOMY-AWARE REGISTRATION TOOLKIT FOR LUNG CT REGISTRATION WITH KEYPOINTS SUPERVISION. ROBUST QUANTIFICATION OF PERCENT EMPHYSEMA ON CT VIA DOMAIN ATTENTION: THE MULTI-ETHNIC STUDY OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS (MESA) LUNG STUDY. SIFT-DBT: SELF-SUPERVISED INITIALIZATION AND FINE-TUNING FOR IMBALANCED DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS IMAGE CLASSIFICATION. QUANTIFYING HIPPOCAMPAL SHAPE ASYMMETRY IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE USING OPTIMAL SHAPE CORRESPONDENCES.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1