脑卒中引起的单侧脑损伤如何改变心理物理阈值。

Advances in neurology and neuroscience research Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-31
Melissa Allen, Tracy Kretzmer, George Jewell, Heather Murphy, Jeff Thostenson, Mark Mennemeier
{"title":"脑卒中引起的单侧脑损伤如何改变心理物理阈值。","authors":"Melissa Allen,&nbsp;Tracy Kretzmer,&nbsp;George Jewell,&nbsp;Heather Murphy,&nbsp;Jeff Thostenson,&nbsp;Mark Mennemeier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined whether and how the absolute thresholds and the just noticeable difference thresholds for eleven, sensory/perceptual continua are altered by unilateral left and right hemisphere lesions due to stroke relative to healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The three subject groups were those with unilateral right hemisphere lesions (n=21), with unilateral left hemisphere lesions (n=13), and age-matched control subjects (n=76). Absolute thresholds of sensory detection and just noticeable difference thresholds were assessed for perceptual continua spanning the visual, tactile, proprioceptive, thermal, and gustatory sensory modalities. For stroke subjects, brain lesions were analyzed using subtraction techniques and volume analysis with the MRIcro and MRIcroN software programs. Stroke subjects also complete tests for spatial neglect, stroke severity and functional independence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference among subject groups regarding gender, race, hand dominance, age, or educational composition. There was no significant difference between subjects with right and left hemisphere lesions on measures of function, stroke severity, or lesion volume except for those with spatial neglect. The RHL group had a higher percentage of impaired perceptual continua (16%) than both normal controls (4%) and the LHL group (9%). If a stoke subject had an impaired threshold on one side of the body, they were ~5 times more likely to have an impaired threshold on the other side of the body. This result was more consistent and even exaggerated (~8 times more likely) in the small percentage of normal control subjects who demonstrated \"impaired\" sensory thresholds. Lesion volume was positively correlated with stroke severity and sensory threshold impairment, and it was negatively correlated with functional independence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When subjects, have difficulty detecting and discriminating sensory experiences, they tend to do so on both sides of the body. Unilateral right hemisphere stroke appeared to increase the relative frequency of altered thresholds occurring on the contralesional side of the body even though they made errors on both sides.</p>","PeriodicalId":93405,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neurology and neuroscience research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On How Psychophysical Thresholds are Altered by Unilateral Brain Injury Due to Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Allen,&nbsp;Tracy Kretzmer,&nbsp;George Jewell,&nbsp;Heather Murphy,&nbsp;Jeff Thostenson,&nbsp;Mark Mennemeier\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined whether and how the absolute thresholds and the just noticeable difference thresholds for eleven, sensory/perceptual continua are altered by unilateral left and right hemisphere lesions due to stroke relative to healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The three subject groups were those with unilateral right hemisphere lesions (n=21), with unilateral left hemisphere lesions (n=13), and age-matched control subjects (n=76). Absolute thresholds of sensory detection and just noticeable difference thresholds were assessed for perceptual continua spanning the visual, tactile, proprioceptive, thermal, and gustatory sensory modalities. For stroke subjects, brain lesions were analyzed using subtraction techniques and volume analysis with the MRIcro and MRIcroN software programs. Stroke subjects also complete tests for spatial neglect, stroke severity and functional independence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference among subject groups regarding gender, race, hand dominance, age, or educational composition. There was no significant difference between subjects with right and left hemisphere lesions on measures of function, stroke severity, or lesion volume except for those with spatial neglect. The RHL group had a higher percentage of impaired perceptual continua (16%) than both normal controls (4%) and the LHL group (9%). If a stoke subject had an impaired threshold on one side of the body, they were ~5 times more likely to have an impaired threshold on the other side of the body. This result was more consistent and even exaggerated (~8 times more likely) in the small percentage of normal control subjects who demonstrated \\\"impaired\\\" sensory thresholds. Lesion volume was positively correlated with stroke severity and sensory threshold impairment, and it was negatively correlated with functional independence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When subjects, have difficulty detecting and discriminating sensory experiences, they tend to do so on both sides of the body. Unilateral right hemisphere stroke appeared to increase the relative frequency of altered thresholds occurring on the contralesional side of the body even though they made errors on both sides.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in neurology and neuroscience research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752079/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in neurology and neuroscience research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neurology and neuroscience research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究脑卒中患者的左、右半球单侧损伤是否改变了11个感觉/知觉连续体的绝对阈值和仅显着差异阈值,以及如何改变这些阈值。方法:三组患者分别为单侧右半球病变患者(n=21)、单侧左半球病变患者(n=13)和年龄匹配的对照组(n=76)。对跨越视觉、触觉、本体感觉、热感和味觉感官模式的知觉连续性进行了绝对阈值和可注意差异阈值的评估。对于中风受试者,使用减法技术和MRIcro和MRIcroN软件程序进行脑损伤分析。卒中受试者还需要完成空间忽视、卒中严重程度和功能独立性的测试。结果:被试组在性别、种族、手优势、年龄、教育程度等方面无显著差异。除了空间忽视外,左右半球病变的受试者在功能、中风严重程度或病变体积方面没有显著差异。RHL组知觉连续性受损的比例(16%)高于正常对照组(4%)和LHL组(9%)。如果一个中风患者身体一侧的阈值受损,那么他们身体另一侧阈值受损的可能性是正常人的5倍。这一结果在小部分表现出感觉阈值“受损”的正常对照受试者中更为一致,甚至更夸张(约8倍的可能性)。病变体积与脑卒中严重程度、感觉阈值损害呈正相关,与功能独立性呈负相关。结论:当被试在感知和辨别感官体验方面有困难时,他们倾向于在身体两侧都有困难。单侧右半球中风似乎增加了发生在身体对侧的阈值改变的相对频率,即使他们在两侧都犯了错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On How Psychophysical Thresholds are Altered by Unilateral Brain Injury Due to Stroke.

Objective: This study examined whether and how the absolute thresholds and the just noticeable difference thresholds for eleven, sensory/perceptual continua are altered by unilateral left and right hemisphere lesions due to stroke relative to healthy subjects.

Methods: The three subject groups were those with unilateral right hemisphere lesions (n=21), with unilateral left hemisphere lesions (n=13), and age-matched control subjects (n=76). Absolute thresholds of sensory detection and just noticeable difference thresholds were assessed for perceptual continua spanning the visual, tactile, proprioceptive, thermal, and gustatory sensory modalities. For stroke subjects, brain lesions were analyzed using subtraction techniques and volume analysis with the MRIcro and MRIcroN software programs. Stroke subjects also complete tests for spatial neglect, stroke severity and functional independence.

Results: There was no significant difference among subject groups regarding gender, race, hand dominance, age, or educational composition. There was no significant difference between subjects with right and left hemisphere lesions on measures of function, stroke severity, or lesion volume except for those with spatial neglect. The RHL group had a higher percentage of impaired perceptual continua (16%) than both normal controls (4%) and the LHL group (9%). If a stoke subject had an impaired threshold on one side of the body, they were ~5 times more likely to have an impaired threshold on the other side of the body. This result was more consistent and even exaggerated (~8 times more likely) in the small percentage of normal control subjects who demonstrated "impaired" sensory thresholds. Lesion volume was positively correlated with stroke severity and sensory threshold impairment, and it was negatively correlated with functional independence.

Conclusions: When subjects, have difficulty detecting and discriminating sensory experiences, they tend to do so on both sides of the body. Unilateral right hemisphere stroke appeared to increase the relative frequency of altered thresholds occurring on the contralesional side of the body even though they made errors on both sides.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stimulation Induced Changes in Ratio Scaling Between and Within Hemispheres. Can Crossover and Altered Magnitude Estimation in Neglect Be Explained by Contextual Effects? On How Psychophysical Thresholds are Altered by Unilateral Brain Injury Due to Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1