鼻内皮质类固醇喷雾剂给药技术和步骤的评价。

IF 1.6 Q3 ALLERGY Asia Pacific Allergy Pub Date : 2022-01-24 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e7
Supachet Rattanawong, Panuwat Wongwattana, Supatat Kantukiti
{"title":"鼻内皮质类固醇喷雾剂给药技术和步骤的评价。","authors":"Supachet Rattanawong,&nbsp;Panuwat Wongwattana,&nbsp;Supatat Kantukiti","doi":"10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) is one of the most effective treatments for allergic rhinitis (AR). To achieve optimum efficiency while avoiding adverse effects (AEs), patients must comply with and follow the drug administration instructions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate INCS administration techniques and steps and the association between inaccurate drug administration and AEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed in patients diagnosed with AR who had used an INCS for more than 1 month at the HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center, Nakhon Nayok, Thailand between September 2020 and August 2021. Patient information was collected, evaluate the accuracy of the application techniques and the steps they followed for INCS administration and the occurrence of any associated AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 150 subjects diagnosed with AR met the criteria. Only 6 patients (4%) correctly performed all 12 steps of INCS administration, while 44 patients (29.33%) correctly performed the 5 recommended essential steps. AEs were found in 23 patients (15.33%), with not pointing the tip slightly outward away from the septum significantly associated with a 3.6 times higher risk of AEs in patients (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-9.4; <i>p</i> = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Investigations into INCS use in patients with AR revealed that only 4% of patients correctly performed all the administration techniques and steps, while 30% of patients at least followed the 5 recommended essential steps perfectly. Not pointing the tip slightly outward away from the septum was found to result in the most AEs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Thai Clinical Trials Registry: TCTR-20210718003.</p>","PeriodicalId":8488,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Allergy","volume":"12 1","pages":"e7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3a/1e/apa-12-e7.PMC8819420.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the techniques and steps of intranasal corticosteroid sprays administration.\",\"authors\":\"Supachet Rattanawong,&nbsp;Panuwat Wongwattana,&nbsp;Supatat Kantukiti\",\"doi\":\"10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) is one of the most effective treatments for allergic rhinitis (AR). To achieve optimum efficiency while avoiding adverse effects (AEs), patients must comply with and follow the drug administration instructions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate INCS administration techniques and steps and the association between inaccurate drug administration and AEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed in patients diagnosed with AR who had used an INCS for more than 1 month at the HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center, Nakhon Nayok, Thailand between September 2020 and August 2021. Patient information was collected, evaluate the accuracy of the application techniques and the steps they followed for INCS administration and the occurrence of any associated AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 150 subjects diagnosed with AR met the criteria. Only 6 patients (4%) correctly performed all 12 steps of INCS administration, while 44 patients (29.33%) correctly performed the 5 recommended essential steps. AEs were found in 23 patients (15.33%), with not pointing the tip slightly outward away from the septum significantly associated with a 3.6 times higher risk of AEs in patients (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-9.4; <i>p</i> = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Investigations into INCS use in patients with AR revealed that only 4% of patients correctly performed all the administration techniques and steps, while 30% of patients at least followed the 5 recommended essential steps perfectly. Not pointing the tip slightly outward away from the septum was found to result in the most AEs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Thai Clinical Trials Registry: TCTR-20210718003.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Allergy\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"e7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3a/1e/apa-12-e7.PMC8819420.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鼻内皮质类固醇(INCS)是治疗变应性鼻炎(AR)最有效的方法之一。为了达到最佳的疗效,同时避免不良反应(ae),患者必须遵守并遵循药物给药说明。目的:评价INCS给药技术、步骤及给药不准确与不良反应的关系。方法:对2020年9月至2021年8月期间在泰国那空Nayok的玛哈Chakri诗琳通公主医疗中心使用INCS超过1个月的AR患者进行描述性横断面研究。收集患者信息,评估应用技术的准确性和使用INCS的步骤,以及任何相关不良事件的发生。结果:总共有150名被诊断为AR的受试者符合标准。只有6例患者(4%)正确执行了INCS给药的全部12个步骤,而44例患者(29.33%)正确执行了推荐的5个基本步骤。23例(15.33%)患者发生不良反应,鼻尖未稍向外远离鼻中隔的患者发生不良反应的风险显著增加3.6倍(优势比,3.6;95%置信区间为1.3-9.4;P = 0.012)。结论:对AR患者使用INCS的调查显示,只有4%的患者正确执行了所有给药技术和步骤,而30%的患者至少完美地遵循了推荐的5个基本步骤。未将鼻尖稍微向外指向远离鼻中隔的地方被发现会导致大多数ae。试验注册:泰国临床试验注册中心:tcr -20210718003。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the techniques and steps of intranasal corticosteroid sprays administration.

Background: Intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) is one of the most effective treatments for allergic rhinitis (AR). To achieve optimum efficiency while avoiding adverse effects (AEs), patients must comply with and follow the drug administration instructions.

Objective: To evaluate INCS administration techniques and steps and the association between inaccurate drug administration and AEs.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed in patients diagnosed with AR who had used an INCS for more than 1 month at the HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center, Nakhon Nayok, Thailand between September 2020 and August 2021. Patient information was collected, evaluate the accuracy of the application techniques and the steps they followed for INCS administration and the occurrence of any associated AEs.

Results: In total, 150 subjects diagnosed with AR met the criteria. Only 6 patients (4%) correctly performed all 12 steps of INCS administration, while 44 patients (29.33%) correctly performed the 5 recommended essential steps. AEs were found in 23 patients (15.33%), with not pointing the tip slightly outward away from the septum significantly associated with a 3.6 times higher risk of AEs in patients (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-9.4; p = 0.012).

Conclusion: Investigations into INCS use in patients with AR revealed that only 4% of patients correctly performed all the administration techniques and steps, while 30% of patients at least followed the 5 recommended essential steps perfectly. Not pointing the tip slightly outward away from the septum was found to result in the most AEs.

Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry: TCTR-20210718003.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Asia Pacific Allergy (AP Allergy) is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (APAAACI). Although the primary aim of the journal is to promote communication between Asia Pacific scientists who are interested in allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology including immunodeficiency, the journal is intended to be available worldwide. To enable scientists and clinicians from emerging societies appreciate the scope and intent of the journal, early issues will contain more educational review material. For better communication and understanding, it will include rational concepts related to the diagnosis and management of asthma and other immunological conditions. Over time, the journal will increase the number of original research papers to become the foremost citation journal for allergy and clinical immunology information of the Asia Pacific in the future.
期刊最新文献
Anti-IL-4Rα monoclonal antibody (CM310) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CROWNS-2): Rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) suspected triggered by lipid transfer protein in a Chinese child: A case report. From tumor to tolerance: A comprehensive review of immune checkpoint inhibitors and immune-related adverse events. New-onset autoimmune thyroid disease following COVID-19. Identification of cross-reactive IgE-binding proteins from Philippine allergenic grass pollen extracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1