COVID-19大流行期间巴基斯坦临床诊断实验室生物安全实施情况评估

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jobb.2022.01.001
Samreen Sarwar , Faheem Shahzad , Ayesha Vajeeha , Rimsha Munir , Amina Yaqoob , Aniqa Naeem , Mamoona Sattar , Sheereen Gull
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间巴基斯坦临床诊断实验室生物安全实施情况评估","authors":"Samreen Sarwar ,&nbsp;Faheem Shahzad ,&nbsp;Ayesha Vajeeha ,&nbsp;Rimsha Munir ,&nbsp;Amina Yaqoob ,&nbsp;Aniqa Naeem ,&nbsp;Mamoona Sattar ,&nbsp;Sheereen Gull","doi":"10.1016/j.jobb.2022.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Laboratory diagnostic capacity is crucial for an optimal national response to a public health emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Preventing laboratory-acquired infections and the loss of critical human resources, especially during a public health emergency, requires laboratories to have a good biorisk management system in place. In this study, we aimed to evaluate laboratory biosafety and biosecurity in Pakistan during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this cross-sectional study, a self-rated anonymous questionnaire was distributed to laboratory professionals (LPs) working in clinical diagnostic laboratories, including laboratories performing polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based COVID-19 diagnostic testing in Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and Gilgit-Baltistan provinces as well as Islamabad during March 2020 to April 2020. The questionnaire assessed knowledge and perceptions of LPs, resource availability, and commitment by top management in these laboratories. In total, 58.6% of LPs performing COVID-19 testing reported that their laboratory did not conduct a biorisk assessment before starting COVID-19 testing in their facility. Only 31% of LPs were aware that COVID-19 testing could be performed at a biosafety level 2 laboratory, as per the World Health Organization interim biosafety guidelines. A sufficiently high percentage of LPs did not feel confident in their ability to handle COVID-19 samples (32.8%), spills (43.1%), or other accidents (32.8%). These findings demonstrate the need for effective biosafety program implementation, proper training, and establishing competency assessment methods. These findings also suggested that identifying and addressing gaps in existing biorisk management systems through sustainable interventions and preparing LPs for surge capacity is crucial to better address public health emergencies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 43-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8768056/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of biosafety implementation in clinical diagnostic laboratories in Pakistan during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Samreen Sarwar ,&nbsp;Faheem Shahzad ,&nbsp;Ayesha Vajeeha ,&nbsp;Rimsha Munir ,&nbsp;Amina Yaqoob ,&nbsp;Aniqa Naeem ,&nbsp;Mamoona Sattar ,&nbsp;Sheereen Gull\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jobb.2022.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Laboratory diagnostic capacity is crucial for an optimal national response to a public health emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Preventing laboratory-acquired infections and the loss of critical human resources, especially during a public health emergency, requires laboratories to have a good biorisk management system in place. In this study, we aimed to evaluate laboratory biosafety and biosecurity in Pakistan during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this cross-sectional study, a self-rated anonymous questionnaire was distributed to laboratory professionals (LPs) working in clinical diagnostic laboratories, including laboratories performing polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based COVID-19 diagnostic testing in Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and Gilgit-Baltistan provinces as well as Islamabad during March 2020 to April 2020. The questionnaire assessed knowledge and perceptions of LPs, resource availability, and commitment by top management in these laboratories. In total, 58.6% of LPs performing COVID-19 testing reported that their laboratory did not conduct a biorisk assessment before starting COVID-19 testing in their facility. Only 31% of LPs were aware that COVID-19 testing could be performed at a biosafety level 2 laboratory, as per the World Health Organization interim biosafety guidelines. A sufficiently high percentage of LPs did not feel confident in their ability to handle COVID-19 samples (32.8%), spills (43.1%), or other accidents (32.8%). These findings demonstrate the need for effective biosafety program implementation, proper training, and establishing competency assessment methods. These findings also suggested that identifying and addressing gaps in existing biorisk management systems through sustainable interventions and preparing LPs for surge capacity is crucial to better address public health emergencies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 43-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8768056/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1093\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588933822000012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588933822000012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

实验室诊断能力对于国家对COVID-19大流行等突发公共卫生事件做出最佳反应至关重要。预防实验室获得性感染和关键人力资源的损失,特别是在突发公共卫生事件期间,需要实验室具备良好的生物风险管理系统。在本研究中,我们旨在评估2019冠状病毒病大流行期间巴基斯坦的实验室生物安全和生物安全。在这项横断研究中,在2020年3月至2020年4月期间,向在旁遮普省、信德省、开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省和吉尔吉特-巴尔蒂斯坦省以及伊斯兰堡的临床诊断实验室工作的实验室专业人员(LPs)分发了一份自评匿名问卷。这些实验室进行基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的COVID-19诊断检测。调查问卷评估了这些实验室对有限合伙人的知识和看法、资源可用性和高层管理人员的承诺。总共有58.6%进行COVID-19检测的lp报告说,他们的实验室在开始在其设施中进行COVID-19检测之前没有进行生物风险评估。只有31%的有限责任公司知道,根据世界卫生组织的临时生物安全指南,COVID-19检测可以在生物安全2级实验室进行。相当高比例的有限合伙人对自己处理COVID-19样本(32.8%)、泄漏(43.1%)或其他事故(32.8%)的能力没有信心。这些发现表明,需要有效的生物安全计划实施,适当的培训,并建立能力评估方法。这些发现还表明,通过可持续干预措施确定和解决现有生物风险管理系统中的差距,并为应急响应能力做好准备,对于更好地应对突发公共卫生事件至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of biosafety implementation in clinical diagnostic laboratories in Pakistan during the COVID-19 pandemic

Laboratory diagnostic capacity is crucial for an optimal national response to a public health emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Preventing laboratory-acquired infections and the loss of critical human resources, especially during a public health emergency, requires laboratories to have a good biorisk management system in place. In this study, we aimed to evaluate laboratory biosafety and biosecurity in Pakistan during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this cross-sectional study, a self-rated anonymous questionnaire was distributed to laboratory professionals (LPs) working in clinical diagnostic laboratories, including laboratories performing polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based COVID-19 diagnostic testing in Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and Gilgit-Baltistan provinces as well as Islamabad during March 2020 to April 2020. The questionnaire assessed knowledge and perceptions of LPs, resource availability, and commitment by top management in these laboratories. In total, 58.6% of LPs performing COVID-19 testing reported that their laboratory did not conduct a biorisk assessment before starting COVID-19 testing in their facility. Only 31% of LPs were aware that COVID-19 testing could be performed at a biosafety level 2 laboratory, as per the World Health Organization interim biosafety guidelines. A sufficiently high percentage of LPs did not feel confident in their ability to handle COVID-19 samples (32.8%), spills (43.1%), or other accidents (32.8%). These findings demonstrate the need for effective biosafety program implementation, proper training, and establishing competency assessment methods. These findings also suggested that identifying and addressing gaps in existing biorisk management systems through sustainable interventions and preparing LPs for surge capacity is crucial to better address public health emergencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
41 days
期刊最新文献
Transformative advances in veterinary laboratory practices: Evaluating the impact of preliminary training in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan provinces of Pakistan Lessons for biosecurity education from the International Nuclear Security Education Network A stochastic epidemic model with time delays and unreported cases based on Markovian switching Numerical simulations of a two-strain dengue model to investigate the efficacy of the deployment of Wolbachia-carrying mosquitoes and vaccination for reducing the incidence of dengue infections Genetic diversity, virulence profiles, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolated from typhoid fever patients in Baghdad, Iraq
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1