纳粹集中营里的自杀事件,1933-9年。

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of Contemporary History Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.1177/0022009410366558
Christian Goeschel
{"title":"纳粹集中营里的自杀事件,1933-9年。","authors":"Christian Goeschel","doi":"10.1177/0022009410366558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Too often histories of the concentration camps tend to be ignorant of the wider political context of nazi repression and control. This article tries to overcome this problem. Combining legal, social and political history, it contributes to a more thorough understanding of the changing relationship between the camps as places of extra-legal terror and the judiciary, between nazi terror and the law. It argues that the conflict between the judiciary and the SS was not a conflict between \"good\" and \"evil,\" as existing accounts claim. Rather, it was a power struggle for jurisdiction over the camps. Concentration camp authorities covered up the murders of prisoners as suicides to prevent judicial investigations. This article also looks at actual suicides in the pre-war camps, to highlight individual inmates' reactions to life within the camps. The article concludes that the history of the concentration camps needs to be firmly integrated into the history of nazi terror and the Third Reich.</p>","PeriodicalId":51640,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary History","volume":"45 3","pages":"628-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0022009410366558","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suicide in Nazi concentration camps, 1933-9.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Goeschel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0022009410366558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Too often histories of the concentration camps tend to be ignorant of the wider political context of nazi repression and control. This article tries to overcome this problem. Combining legal, social and political history, it contributes to a more thorough understanding of the changing relationship between the camps as places of extra-legal terror and the judiciary, between nazi terror and the law. It argues that the conflict between the judiciary and the SS was not a conflict between \\\"good\\\" and \\\"evil,\\\" as existing accounts claim. Rather, it was a power struggle for jurisdiction over the camps. Concentration camp authorities covered up the murders of prisoners as suicides to prevent judicial investigations. This article also looks at actual suicides in the pre-war camps, to highlight individual inmates' reactions to life within the camps. The article concludes that the history of the concentration camps needs to be firmly integrated into the history of nazi terror and the Third Reich.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary History\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"628-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0022009410366558\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009410366558\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009410366558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

集中营的历史往往忽略了纳粹镇压和控制的更广泛的政治背景。本文试图克服这个问题。它结合了法律、社会和政治历史,有助于更透彻地理解集中营作为法外恐怖和司法、纳粹恐怖和法律之间不断变化的关系。它认为,司法部门和党卫军之间的冲突并不是“善”与“恶”之间的冲突,正如现有的报道所宣称的那样。相反,这是一场争夺集中营管辖权的权力斗争。集中营当局为了防止司法调查,将囚犯的死亡伪装成自杀。这篇文章还关注了战前集中营中的实际自杀事件,以突出每个囚犯对集中营生活的反应。文章的结论是,集中营的历史需要牢固地融入纳粹恐怖和第三帝国的历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Suicide in Nazi concentration camps, 1933-9.

Too often histories of the concentration camps tend to be ignorant of the wider political context of nazi repression and control. This article tries to overcome this problem. Combining legal, social and political history, it contributes to a more thorough understanding of the changing relationship between the camps as places of extra-legal terror and the judiciary, between nazi terror and the law. It argues that the conflict between the judiciary and the SS was not a conflict between "good" and "evil," as existing accounts claim. Rather, it was a power struggle for jurisdiction over the camps. Concentration camp authorities covered up the murders of prisoners as suicides to prevent judicial investigations. This article also looks at actual suicides in the pre-war camps, to highlight individual inmates' reactions to life within the camps. The article concludes that the history of the concentration camps needs to be firmly integrated into the history of nazi terror and the Third Reich.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Historical Understanding: Past, Present, and Future by Zoltán Boldizsár Simon and Lars Deile (eds) Book Review: Designs on Democracy: Architecture and the Public in Interwar London by Neal Shasore Book Review: The Shortest History of the Soviet Union by Sheila Fitzpatrick Book Review: Decolonizing 1968: Transnational Student Activism in Tunis, Paris, and Dakar by Burleigh Hendrickson Book Review: White Mineworkers on Zambia’s Copperbelt, 1926–74: In a Class of Their Own by Duncan Money
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1