[精神疾病患者的安乐死和协助自杀]。

IF 0.3 Q4 ETHICS Cuadernos de Bioetica Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.30444/CB.121
Lucía Gallego, Pablo Barreiro Y Manuel de Santiago, Manuel de Santiago
{"title":"[精神疾病患者的安乐死和协助自杀]。","authors":"Lucía Gallego,&nbsp;Pablo Barreiro Y Manuel de Santiago,&nbsp;Manuel de Santiago","doi":"10.30444/CB.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Until 2020, only Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, and the Netherlands admitted, under differentiated legal coverage, requests for euthanasia and / or assisted suicide in patients with non-terminal illnesses, and for reasons of intractable and unbearable suffering. Since March 2021 this is also possible in Spain. The objective of this work is to review the existing studies and characteristics of the practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide (ESA) in people with mental disorders (TM) and / or dementia (D) and see if the legal requirements essential in ESA applications in these patients are to be met. The hypothesis is that compliance with these requirements is especially difficult in patients with TM-D, either because of the characteristics of the disease itself, or because of the recognized legal security failures. Likewise, there may be sources of fraud not actually prosecuted by the State, either due to the complicity of society and / or due to the necessary cooperation of Medicine. As a result of this review, we raise criticaethical-deontological considerations about the approval of ESA for patients with TM-D, and its errors and consequences, to the reflection of the readers. We propose as an alternative to ESA the so-called ″palliative psychiatry″, which aims at improving the quality of life of patients and their families by facing the problems associated with severe persistent mental illness -potentially fatal- through the prevention and relief of suffering.</p>","PeriodicalId":42510,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Euthanasia and assisted suicide in people with mental disorders].\",\"authors\":\"Lucía Gallego,&nbsp;Pablo Barreiro Y Manuel de Santiago,&nbsp;Manuel de Santiago\",\"doi\":\"10.30444/CB.121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Until 2020, only Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, and the Netherlands admitted, under differentiated legal coverage, requests for euthanasia and / or assisted suicide in patients with non-terminal illnesses, and for reasons of intractable and unbearable suffering. Since March 2021 this is also possible in Spain. The objective of this work is to review the existing studies and characteristics of the practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide (ESA) in people with mental disorders (TM) and / or dementia (D) and see if the legal requirements essential in ESA applications in these patients are to be met. The hypothesis is that compliance with these requirements is especially difficult in patients with TM-D, either because of the characteristics of the disease itself, or because of the recognized legal security failures. Likewise, there may be sources of fraud not actually prosecuted by the State, either due to the complicity of society and / or due to the necessary cooperation of Medicine. As a result of this review, we raise criticaethical-deontological considerations about the approval of ESA for patients with TM-D, and its errors and consequences, to the reflection of the readers. We propose as an alternative to ESA the so-called ″palliative psychiatry″, which aims at improving the quality of life of patients and their families by facing the problems associated with severe persistent mental illness -potentially fatal- through the prevention and relief of suffering.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuadernos de Bioetica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuadernos de Bioetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30444/CB.121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30444/CB.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直到2020年,只有比利时、卢森堡、瑞士和荷兰在不同的法律覆盖范围下,承认非绝症患者因难以治愈和无法忍受的痛苦而提出安乐死和/或协助自杀的请求。从2021年3月起,这在西班牙也可以实现。这项工作的目的是回顾对精神障碍(TM)和/或痴呆(D)患者实施安乐死和协助自杀(ESA)的现有研究和特点,看看这些患者是否符合ESA应用的法律要求。假设是,由于疾病本身的特点,或者由于公认的法律保障失败,在tcm - d患者中遵守这些要求尤其困难。同样,由于社会的共谋和(或)医学的必要合作,可能存在国家实际上没有起诉的欺诈来源。作为这篇综述的结果,我们提出了对TM-D患者批准ESA的批判性伦理-道义考虑,以及它的错误和后果,以反映读者。我们建议将所谓的″姑息精神病学″作为ESA的替代方案,其目的是通过预防和减轻痛苦来面对与严重持续性精神疾病(可能致命)相关的问题,从而改善患者及其家属的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Euthanasia and assisted suicide in people with mental disorders].

Until 2020, only Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, and the Netherlands admitted, under differentiated legal coverage, requests for euthanasia and / or assisted suicide in patients with non-terminal illnesses, and for reasons of intractable and unbearable suffering. Since March 2021 this is also possible in Spain. The objective of this work is to review the existing studies and characteristics of the practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide (ESA) in people with mental disorders (TM) and / or dementia (D) and see if the legal requirements essential in ESA applications in these patients are to be met. The hypothesis is that compliance with these requirements is especially difficult in patients with TM-D, either because of the characteristics of the disease itself, or because of the recognized legal security failures. Likewise, there may be sources of fraud not actually prosecuted by the State, either due to the complicity of society and / or due to the necessary cooperation of Medicine. As a result of this review, we raise criticaethical-deontological considerations about the approval of ESA for patients with TM-D, and its errors and consequences, to the reflection of the readers. We propose as an alternative to ESA the so-called ″palliative psychiatry″, which aims at improving the quality of life of patients and their families by facing the problems associated with severe persistent mental illness -potentially fatal- through the prevention and relief of suffering.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: La revista Cuadernos de Bioética, órgano oficial de la Asociación Española de Bioética y Ética Médica, publica cuatrimestralmente artículos y recensiones bibliográficas sobre todas las áreas de la bioética: fundamentación, ética de la investigación, bioética clínica, biojurídica, etc. Estos proceden de los aceptados en la revisión tutelada por los editores de la revista como de otros que por encargo el comité editorial solicite a sus autores. La edicion de la revista se financia con las aportaciones de los socios de AEBI.
期刊最新文献
[Bioethical issues of Covid-19 in Spain. A systematic review]. [Ethical and legal implications of digital mental health applications]. [Human reason versus arrogance technoscience and the replacement shadow. -Ethical evaluation and social control to regain power on the means and ends from the work of José Sanmartín]. [Response to: ″An egg is not a chicken and an embryo is not a child″]. [The proposal for a regulation on the recognition of parenthood: An attempt to recognize surrogacy in the European Union?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1